Synopsis
Although most mTBI patients recover by 3-6
months, they suffer serious short and long term effects. Additionally, multiple
mTBIs may have serious long-term consequences. Here, we correlated brain
network-level connectivity features derived from resting state functional
magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) with clinical symptoms, in order to identify neuroimaging
biomarkers of mTBI as patients recover over 3 months. We used a
machine-learning framework to select connectivity features associated with
symptoms and identified functional regions with altered connectivity. These
modular network-level features can be used as diagnostic tools for predicting
disease severity and recovery profiles.Purpose
mTBI patients exhibit acute symptoms including headache,
blurry vision and memory problems, though CT/MRI scans often appear normal
1,2. While these symptoms
resolve within few weeks, a second impact during this vulnerable phase can lead
to persistent damage
3. For
sports-related injuries, the decision for return-to-play is the most difficult
responsibility facing the physician, and currently this decision is largely based on self-reported
symptoms. rs-fMRI may be an additional, more objective tool to assess the
severity of the injury. The purpose of this study was to identify functional
biomarkers of mTBI during the 3 months following mTBI, with the ultimate goal
of predicting patient’s symptom severity and recovery profile
Methods
After obtaining informed consent,
rs-fMRI was recorded from 78 patients at four time points (3 days, 7 days, 1
month and 3 months) after mTBI and 26 healthy controls (2 sessions, 1 week
apart). After eliminating missing and noisy data, we analyzed 184 time points
in total. Using GE 3T MRI scanner, multi-band (acceleration factor 3) 2D-EPI,
TR/TE = 900/30 ms was acquired for 6 minutes (395 volumes), with 1.875mm2
in-plane resolution and 3mm slice thickness to cover the whole brain.
T1-weighted scan (1mm resolution) was acquired at each time point. All
participants filled a neuropsychological self-assessment questionnaire that was
used to calculate symptom severity scores4
(SSS). rs-fMRI data were motion corrected, rigid registered to T1-weighted
image, non-rigid registered to MNI atlas, nuisance removed using aCompCor5,
spatial smoothed using gaussian filter (FWHM 4mm) and temporally band-pass
filtered (0.01 -0.1 Hz) using custom-built software. Mean time courses of 90
functional ROIs6
were extracted. Correlation coefficients were computed between every pair of
time courses, producing a 90x90 matrix. Correlation values were transformed to z-scores
using Fisher transform. Average correlation between ROIs belonging to same network
(14 networks, within network connectivity, WNC) and between networks (between
network connectivity, BNC) were computed. This yielded a total of 105 features:
14 WNC features and 91 BNC features (14C2).
To automatically identify features
associated with SSS, recursive feature elimination (RFE)7
method using decision trees as prediction models were used (Figure 1). Initially, a machine learning (ML) model was
built using all 105 features and was used to rank the importance of features
based on contribution to increase in node purity at various splits of the
decision tree. Smaller subsets of top-ranked features were used to build
efficient ML models and the cross-validation (CV) performance was evaluated for
every subset.
Results
Average connectivity across 90 ROIs was
negatively correlated with SSS (
Figure
2A). On binning the patients with low (SSS<10) and high (SSS>30) symptoms,
there was a visible difference between the two patient groups
(Figure 2D, note BNC changes in
off-diagonal elements). To identify if the changes in connectivity with SSS
were contributed by interactions within or between networks, we performed
feature sub-selection using a ML framework (
Figure 1). The top-ranked features identified by RFE included BNC
between higher and primary visual, executive control (ECN) and precuneus
networks (
Figure 3). Using these
features, we achieved a best performance of ~23 CV RMSE for predicting SSS. 9
of the top 10 relevant features were BNC measures (
Figure 3A). BNC between L-ECN and higher visual networks was more
strongly anti-correlated in high-score mTBI patients (
Figure 3B). In contrast, BNC between primary and higher visual
networks increased in mTBI patients (
Figure
3B).
Discussion
We observed an overall decreased connectivity in mTBI
patients with high symptom scores. We used RFE based ML framework to sub-select
modular network-based connectivity features that showed correlation with SSS. Typically
in neuroimaging studies, number of features are much larger than the number of observations.
Here, we introduce a novel ML framework for feature selection to improve
interpretability and reduce over fitting.
The
changes with SSS were more strongly reflected in BNC compared to WNC
features, indicating that brain injury disrupts association between functional brain
network modules. The observed decrease in connectivity between L-ECN (including
superior and middle frontal gyri) and higher visual areas in mTBI is in
agreement with a previous study that showed similar altered patterns of
activation in fMRI during working memory tasks8. The
observed increase in visual region connectivity has been shown when subjects
become aware of stimuli9
and top-down attention also has an influence in this connectivity10;
implying mTBI patients with higher scores are perhaps explicitly paying more
attention to external stimuli. To understand the neural mechanisms underlying
these changes, we plan to investigate specific sub-scores related to visual, motor
and attention with the corresponding networks.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Bigler, E. D. Neuropsychology and
clinical neuroscience of persistent post-concussive syndrome. Journal of the International
Neuropsychological Society : JINS 14,
1-22, doi:10.1017/S135561770808017X (2008).
2. Vanderploeg, R. D., Curtiss, G., Luis,
C. A. & Salazar, A. M. Long-term morbidities following self-reported mild
traumatic brain injury. Journal of
clinical and experimental neuropsychology 29, 585-598, doi:10.1080/13803390600826587 (2007).
3. Guskiewicz, K. M. et al. Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in
collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study. Jama 290, 2549-2555,
doi:10.1001/jama.290.19.2549 (2003).
4. McCrory, P. Sport concussion
assessment tool 2. Scandinavian journal
of medicine & science in sports 19,
452, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00978.x (2009).
5. Behzadi, Y., Restom, K., Liau, J.
& Liu, T. T. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD
and perfusion based fMRI. NeuroImage 37, 90-101,
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 (2007).
6. Shirer, W. R., Ryali, S.,
Rykhlevskaia, E., Menon, V. & Greicius, M. D. Decoding subject-driven
cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cerebral cortex 22,
158-165, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr099 (2012).
7. Recursive
Feature Elimination http://topepo.github.io/caret/rfe.html.
8. McAllister, T. W. et al. Differential working memory load effects after mild
traumatic brain injury. NeuroImage 14, 1004-1012,
doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0899 (2001).
9. Haynes, J. D., Driver, J. & Rees,
G. Visibility reflects dynamic changes of effective connectivity between V1 and
fusiform cortex. Neuron 46, 811-821, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.012
(2005).
10. Al-Aidroos, N., Said, C. P. &
Turk-Browne, N. B. Top-down attention switches coupling between low-level and
high-level areas of human visual cortex. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 14675-14680,
doi:10.1073/pnas.1202095109 (2012).