Khadija Sheikh1, Fumin Guo1, Alexei Ouriadov1, Dante PI Capaldi1, Sarah Svenningsen1, Miranda Kirby2, David G McCormack3, Harvey O Coxson2, and Grace Parraga1
1Robarts Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2UBC Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Department of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
Synopsis
To accelerate clinical translation of pulmonary proton UTE MRI, the underlying
structural determinants of UTE MR signal-intensity must be determined. We regionally evaluated
multi-volume UTE maps with direct comparison to thoracic CT in subjects with asthma.
UTE MRI signal-intensity was related to CT radio-density, with a trend towards
significance for pulmonary function tests, suggesting that changes in
signal-intensity may reflect gas-trapping.
This is important, because UTE signal-intensity measurements may be used
to identify regions of gas-trapping/ventilation abnormalities in severe asthma without the use of inhaled-gas contrast or
ionizing radiation making this approach
suitable for children where longitudinal monitoring may be required. Purpose
Recently, regional ventilation deficits were estimated in asthmatics based
on the change in signal-intensity measured at different lung volumes using
conventional
1H MR-methods and echo-times.
1 MRI signal-intensity is influenced by hardware
factors such as RF amplifications and the positioning of the RF coils, which introduce
inter-scan variability. Because of this,
it is difficult to ascertain the physiological meaning of
1H MR signal-intensity
changes, especially in asthma where there are complex airway abnormalities that
result in gas-trapping and ventilation/perfusion abnormalities. One way to better understand these MR signal-intensity differences in asthma is to compare these directly with
well-established measurements with clear physical meaning, such as CT radio-density. This was recently accomplished using
ultra-short echo-time (UTE) 2D MRI in COPD and bronchiectasis
2 but not in asthma
patients. Thus, the objective of this
work was to determine the underlying structural
determinants of UTE MR signal-intensity by regionally evaluating multi-volume
UTE maps with direct comparison to thoracic CT. We hypothesized that UTE MRI signal
differences related to lung volume would be spatially related to pulmonary
abnormalities as visualized using CT.
Methods
Subjects: Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of severe
uncontrolled asthma provided written informed consent and were evaluated using
UTE and noble gas MRI, thoracic CT, spirometry and plethysmography.
Image Acquisition: Imaging was performed on a whole body 3.0 Tesla
Discovery MR750 (General Electric Health Care, Milwaukee, WI) with broadband
imaging capability. UTE
MRI was obtained using a 32-channel torso coil (GEHC) and 3D cones UTE sequence
(GEHC). Eighteen slices were acquired in
the coronal plane with the following parameters in breath-hold: 15s acquisition
time, TE/TR/flip angle=0.03ms/3.5ms/5°, field-of-view=40×40cm, matrix=200×200,
NEX=1, and slice-thickness=10mm. UTE MR
images were acquired at four lung volumes including full expiration [FE],
functional residual capacity [FRC], FRC plus one liter, and full inspiration
[FI]. Hyperpolarized noble gas static
ventilation images were acquired as previously described.3 Thoracic CT was performed at a lung volume of
FRC+1L, as previously described.2
Image Analysis: UTE
MR images were segmented using the Potts model as previously described4 and
the signal-intensity was normalized to the mean liver signal-intensity, as
previously described.2 The images acquired at FE, FRC, and FI lung
volumes were registered to the images acquired at a volume of FRC+1L, as
previously described.5 The slope of the line that described the
change in normalized signal-intensity over the four lung volumes was determined
pixel-by-pixel to produce a multivolume slope map. Noble gas MR images were analyzed to produce
the ventilation defect percent (VDP), as previously described.3 Lobar segmentation was performed using the CT
images using Pulmonary Workstation 2.0 (VIDA Diagnostics Inc., Coralville, IA,
USA). UTE slope values and CT radio-density
was determined for each lobe.
Statistical Analysis: Univariate Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) were
generated using SPSS 23.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY).
Results
Figure 1 shows thoracic CT images, noble gas static ventilation images,
and UTE slope maps for three representative subjects with decreasing whole lung
slope. The yellow mask overlaid on the
CT image identifies regions of the lung < -950HU. In the UTE slope maps, cool colours represent
regions of larger signal-intensity change and hot colours represent regions of smaller
signal-intensity change across the lung volumes. In six asthmatics (46±6yrs, 3M/3F), mean whole
lung slope was significantly correlated with
mean CT radio-density (ρ=-0.94/p=.02) and
VDP (ρ=-0.88/p=.03). There was a trend towards a significant
relationship between whole lung slope values with the ratio of residual volume
to total lung capacity (RV/TLC) (ρ=0.83/p=.058) and the forced expiratory volume in 1s (ρ=-0.83/p=.058). As shown in
Figure 2, regional lobar UTE slope measurements were significantly correlated
with lobar CT radio-density measurements (ρ=-0.83/p<.001).
Discussion and
Conclusions
Mean whole lung slope was related to radio-density and VDP, with a trend
towards significance for RV/TLC, suggesting that changes in signal-intensity
values may reflect gas-trapping and ventilation abnormalities. Taken together, these results demonstrate that
UTE MRI measurements not only provide information about regional ventilation
deficits, but provide similar information as CT in patients with a diagnosis of
asthma. This is important, because UTE signal-intensity
measurements may be used to identify regions of gas-trapping/ventilation
abnormalities in severe asthma without the use of inhaled-gas contrast or
ionizing radiation making this approach suitable for children where longitudinal
monitoring may be required.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1 Pennati et al. Radiology, (2014).
2 Ma et al. JMRI, (2014).
3 Kirby et al. Acad Radiol, (2012).
4 Guo et al. in ISMRM Conference 2015.
5 Guo et al. in SPIE Medical Imaging 2015.