Yoshiharu Ohno1,2, Masao Yui3, Mitsue Miyazaki4, Yuji Kishida2, Shinichiro Seki2, Hisanobu Koyama2, Katsusuke Kyotani5, Takeshi Yoshikawa1,2, and Kazuro Sugimura2
1Advanced Biomedical Imaging Research Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 2Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 3Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan, 4Toshiba Medical Research Institute USA, Vernon Hills, IL, United States, 5Center for Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
Synopsis
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging is suggested as a new
technique for MR-based molecular imaging techniques in vivo and in vitro
studies. We hypothesized that newly developed CEST imaging, may have a similar
potential for differentiating malignant from benign pulmonary nodules and
masses, when compared with FDG-PET/CT. The
purpose of this study was to directly and prospectively compare the capability
of CEST imaging targeted to amide groups (-NH) for differentiation of malignant
from benign pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET/CT.Introduction
Differentiation of malignant tumor from benign tumor is essential for
radiological examination in routine clinical practice. Currently, CT and MR imaging have been
applied for morphological evaluation, although FDG-PET and PET/CT are currently
applicable molecular imaging technique in various clinical and academic
interest. In contrast to FDG-PET or
PET/CT, chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging is also suggested
as a new technique for MR-based molecular imaging techniques in vivo and in vitro studies (1-5).
However, no major reports have been reported the direct comparison of capabilities
for differentiating malignant and benign pulmonary lesions between CEST imaging
and PET/CT.
We hypothesized that newly
developed CEST imaging, demonstrating the exchange between protons of free
tissue water and amide groups (-NH) of endogenous proteins and peptides (i.e.
amide proton transfer imaging: APT
imaging), may have a similar potential for differentiating malignant from
benign pulmonary nodules and masses, when compared with FDG-PET/CT. The purpose of this study was to directly and
prospectively compare the capability of CEST imaging targeted to amide groups
(-NH) for differentiation of malignant from benign pulmonary lesions with
FDG-PET/CT.
Materials and Methods
Thirty-six consecutive patients (26 men, 10 women; mean age 67 years)
with pulmonary nodules or masses prospectively underwent CEST imaging at 3T MR
system (Vantage Titan 3T, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara,
Tochigi, Japan), FDG-PET/CT, pathological examinations from specimens obtained
by transbronchial or CT-guided biopsies or surgical resection, and/ or
follow-up examinations. According to
pathological examination results, all lesions were divided as follows: benign
(n=10) vs. malignant (n=26) groups. In
addition, malignant groups were consisted with 16 invasive adenocarcinomas, 6
squamous cell carcinomas and 4 adenocarcinoma in situes.
To obtain CEST data in each subject,
respiratory-synchronized fast advanced spin-echo images were conducted
following a series of magnetization transfer (MT) pulses. Then, magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry
(MTRasym) was calculated from z-spectra in each pixel, and MTRasym
map was computationally generated. Then,
ROIs were placed over each lesion, and determine MTRasym and SUVmax.
To determine the relationship between MTRasym
at 3.5 ppm and SUVmax, Pearson’s correlation was evaluated. To determine the MTRasym
difference at 3.5 ppm and SUVmax between malignant and benign
nodules or masses, Student’s t-test was performed. To compare the capability of MTRasym
at 3.5 ppm and SUVmax for differentiating malignant from benign
groups, ROC analysis was performed. Finally,
sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were compared each other by means of
McNemar’s test. A p value less than 0.05
was considered as significant in this study.
Results
Representative cases are shown in Figure 1 and 2. There was no correlation between MTR
asym and
SUV
max (r=0.28, p=0.10). There were
significant differences of both indexes between malignant (MTR
asym:
0.1±5.6 %, SUV
max: 3.0±0.8) and benign (MTR
asym:
-4.2±4.6 %, p<0.05; SUV
max:
2.5±4.4, p<0.05) groups. Area under the curve (Az) of MTR
asym
at 3.5ppm (Az=0.75) had no significant difference with that of SUV
max
(Az=0.70, p=0.67). Compared results of
diagnostic performance between two methods are shown in Figure 3. There were no significant difference of
sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between MTR
asym and SUV
max
(p>0.05).
Conclusion
On 3T MR system, CEST imaging has a potential for differentiating
malignant from benign lesions as well as FDG-PET/CT, and is considered at least
as valuable as PET/CT in this setting. Although
MTR
asym at 3.5ppm and SUV
max shows significant
differences between malignant and benign pulmonary lesions, there was no
significant correlation between MTR
asym at 3.5ppm and FDG uptake. Therefore, CEST imaging can provide
additional information for management of pulmonary lesions, when applied with
PET/CT.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. van Zijl PC, Yadav NN. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65: 927-948
2. Vinogradov E, Sherry AD, Lenkinski RE. J Magn Reson.
2013; 229: 155-172
3. Togao O, Kessinger CW, Huang G, et al. PLoS One. 2013; 8:
e77019
4. Togao O, Yoshiura T, Keupp J, et al. Neuro Oncol. 2014;
16: 441-448
5. Zu Z, Xu J, Li H, Chekmenev EY, et al. Magn Reson Med.
2014; 72: 471-476