CEST Imaging Targeted APT vs. FDG-PET/CT: Capability for Differentiating Malignant from Benign Pulmonary Lesions
Yoshiharu Ohno1,2, Masao Yui3, Mitsue Miyazaki4, Yuji Kishida2, Shinichiro Seki2, Hisanobu Koyama2, Katsusuke Kyotani5, Takeshi Yoshikawa1,2, and Kazuro Sugimura2

1Advanced Biomedical Imaging Research Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 2Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 3Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan, 4Toshiba Medical Research Institute USA, Vernon Hills, IL, United States, 5Center for Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan

Synopsis

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging is suggested as a new technique for MR-based molecular imaging techniques in vivo and in vitro studies. We hypothesized that newly developed CEST imaging, may have a similar potential for differentiating malignant from benign pulmonary nodules and masses, when compared with FDG-PET/CT. The purpose of this study was to directly and prospectively compare the capability of CEST imaging targeted to amide groups (-NH) for differentiation of malignant from benign pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET/CT.

Introduction

Differentiation of malignant tumor from benign tumor is essential for radiological examination in routine clinical practice. Currently, CT and MR imaging have been applied for morphological evaluation, although FDG-PET and PET/CT are currently applicable molecular imaging technique in various clinical and academic interest. In contrast to FDG-PET or PET/CT, chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging is also suggested as a new technique for MR-based molecular imaging techniques in vivo and in vitro studies (1-5). However, no major reports have been reported the direct comparison of capabilities for differentiating malignant and benign pulmonary lesions between CEST imaging and PET/CT.

We hypothesized that newly developed CEST imaging, demonstrating the exchange between protons of free tissue water and amide groups (-NH) of endogenous proteins and peptides (i.e. amide proton transfer imaging: APT imaging), may have a similar potential for differentiating malignant from benign pulmonary nodules and masses, when compared with FDG-PET/CT. The purpose of this study was to directly and prospectively compare the capability of CEST imaging targeted to amide groups (-NH) for differentiation of malignant from benign pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET/CT.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-six consecutive patients (26 men, 10 women; mean age 67 years) with pulmonary nodules or masses prospectively underwent CEST imaging at 3T MR system (Vantage Titan 3T, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan), FDG-PET/CT, pathological examinations from specimens obtained by transbronchial or CT-guided biopsies or surgical resection, and/ or follow-up examinations. According to pathological examination results, all lesions were divided as follows: benign (n=10) vs. malignant (n=26) groups. In addition, malignant groups were consisted with 16 invasive adenocarcinomas, 6 squamous cell carcinomas and 4 adenocarcinoma in situes.

To obtain CEST data in each subject, respiratory-synchronized fast advanced spin-echo images were conducted following a series of magnetization transfer (MT) pulses. Then, magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) was calculated from z-spectra in each pixel, and MTRasym map was computationally generated. Then, ROIs were placed over each lesion, and determine MTRasym and SUVmax.

To determine the relationship between MTRasym at 3.5 ppm and SUVmax, Pearson’s correlation was evaluated. To determine the MTRasym difference at 3.5 ppm and SUVmax between malignant and benign nodules or masses, Student’s t-test was performed. To compare the capability of MTRasym at 3.5 ppm and SUVmax for differentiating malignant from benign groups, ROC analysis was performed. Finally, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were compared each other by means of McNemar’s test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered as significant in this study.

Results

Representative cases are shown in Figure 1 and 2. There was no correlation between MTRasym and SUVmax (r=0.28, p=0.10). There were significant differences of both indexes between malignant (MTRasym: 0.1±5.6 %, SUVmax: 3.0±0.8) and benign (MTRasym: -4.2±4.6 %, p<0.05; SUVmax: 2.5±4.4, p<0.05) groups. Area under the curve (Az) of MTRasym at 3.5ppm (Az=0.75) had no significant difference with that of SUVmax (Az=0.70, p=0.67). Compared results of diagnostic performance between two methods are shown in Figure 3. There were no significant difference of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between MTRasym and SUVmax (p>0.05).

Conclusion

On 3T MR system, CEST imaging has a potential for differentiating malignant from benign lesions as well as FDG-PET/CT, and is considered at least as valuable as PET/CT in this setting. Although MTRasym at 3.5ppm and SUVmax shows significant differences between malignant and benign pulmonary lesions, there was no significant correlation between MTRasym at 3.5ppm and FDG uptake. Therefore, CEST imaging can provide additional information for management of pulmonary lesions, when applied with PET/CT.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. van Zijl PC, Yadav NN. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65: 927-948

2. Vinogradov E, Sherry AD, Lenkinski RE. J Magn Reson. 2013; 229: 155-172

3. Togao O, Kessinger CW, Huang G, et al. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e77019

4. Togao O, Yoshiura T, Keupp J, et al. Neuro Oncol. 2014; 16: 441-448

5. Zu Z, Xu J, Li H, Chekmenev EY, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2014; 72: 471-476

Figures

Figure 1. 73-year-old female with organizing pneumonia (L to R: thin-section CT, SUVmax map fused with CT and MTRasym map fused with T2WI).

Thin-section CT demonstrates a nodule with pleural indentation and notch in the right middle lobe. SUVmax of this nodule was 2.5. APT image shows low MTRasym with the value of -10.37 This case was false-positive on PET/CT, and true-negative on CEST.


Figure 2. 69-year-old female with invasive adenocarcinoma (L to R: thin-section CT, SUVmax map fused with CT and MTRasym map fused with T2WI). Thin-section CT demonstrates a nodule with pleural indentation, notch and spicula in the right lower lobe. SUVmax of this nodule was 3.5. APT image shows high MTRasym with the value of 1.99. This case was true-positive on PET/CT and CEST.

Figure 3. Compared results of diagnostic performance between CEST and PET/CT.

There were no significant differences of area under the curve (Az), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between two methods (p>0.05).




Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1142