Soft-gating and Motion Resolved Reconstructions for Free-Breathing Pulmonary Imaging
Wenwen Jiang1, Frank Ong2, Kevin M Johnson3, Scott K Nagle4, Thomas Hope5, Michael Lustig2, and Peder E.Z Larson5

1Bioengineering, UC Berkeley/UCSF, Berkeley, CA, United States, 2Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, 3Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 4Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 5Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSF, San francisco, CA, United States

Synopsis

Structural pulmonary imaging with MRI has many potential applications including lung nodule detection and interstitial lung disease assessments, but is limited by the challenges of short T2*, low proton density, and respiratory and cardiac motion. We propose a combination of an optimized 3D UTE acquisition with advanced reconstruction methods, including motion correction, parallel imaging, and compressed sensing, aiming to make MRI become a clinical option for pulmonary imaging.

Target audience

Thoracic radiologists, engineers working on reconstruction and motion correction

Purpose

Structural pulmonary imaging with MRI has potential to reduce radiation dose from repeated CT scans, particularly in pediatric diseases requiring longitudinal follow-up, such as cystic fibrosis. However, structural lung MRI has seen limited clinical success, due to the combined factors of short T2*, low proton density, and respiratory and cardiac motion. Recently, 3D UTE sequences have been proposed with optimized SNR efficiency from the data acquisition1 and respiratory gating based on a respiratory belt. However, respiratory belt signals are often not robust or may include significant signal drift. This leads to suboptimal respiratory gating and produces motion blur in the resulting images. Moreover, traditional respiratory gating often results in low imaging efficiency.

The purpose of this study is to optimize the reconstruction of 3D UTE MR pulmonary imaging using 1) a self-gating technique to measure respiratory motion from MRI data itself (DC based self-gating) 2,3, 2) a soft-gating technique to penalize the motion state inconsistency 4, and 3) a motion-resolved technique to provide images of all respiratory motion states,5 and combine them with L1-ESPIRiT, 6 an autocalibrating parallel imaging and compressed sensing method.

We evaluated the proposed methods across different applications: detecting pulmonary nodules, cystic fibrosis and demonstrated the initial feasibility of the proposed method.

Methods

Optimized 3D UTE SPGR sequence with slab excitation and a bit-reversed pseudo-random view ordering from Johnson et al. 1 was implemented on a 3T (GE Healthcare) scanner at two sites. Free-breathing scans on a healthy volunteer as well as on 6 patients were performed across sites, with prescriptions similar to the following: field of view (FOV) = 32×32×30 cm3, TE/TR = 70 μs / 2.932 ms, flip angle = 4º, 1.25 mm isotropic resolution and total acquisition time is 5 min 14 s.

We extracted the respiratory motion from the acquired data by applying a low-pass filter on k-space center signal over time ($$$\|k_0\|$$$). For the soft-gating technique, we applied exponential decay weighting,4 to penalize motion state inconsistency, resulting in an effective undersampling ratio of 2.5:

$$w = \left\{\begin{array}{ll} e^{-\alpha(d - Thresh)} & \textrm{otherwise} \\ 1 & d \le Thresh \end{array} \right. \\ \text{ d is the respiratory motion estimation, $\alpha$ is scaling factor}\\ \text{ w is the soft-gating weights. } $$

For the motion-resolved reconstruction,5 we divided the data equally into 5 motion states and enforced temporal smoothness between motion states by adding total variation norm along respiration dimension on the objective function. Additionally, we incorporated both methods with L1-ESPIRiT, a parallel imaging and compressed sensing method to better exploit the inherent incoherency from the bit-reversed UTE acquisition. Reconstruction and motion correction models are shown in Figure 1. Due to current memory limits on our workstations, the motion-resolved images were reconstructed only on the volunteer with reduced isotropic resolution of 1.6 mm. We compared the soft-gating and motion-resolved L1-ESPIRiT 6 reconstruction with the traditional reconstructions, gated/non-gated gridding with density compensation, by evaluating qualitative SNR and image sharpness. All the reconstructions were carried out using the open source Berkeley Advanced Reconstruction Toolbox (BART: https://mikgroup.github.io/bart/). 7

Results

Figure 2 shows the comparison of traditional reconstructions (left and middle) with our soft-gating reconstruction (right). Red arrows point out the comparison where vessels and fine structures were blurred out by the respiratory motion when the traditional reconstruction was used, while the soft-gating technique was able to resolve the fine structures and diaphragm. Yellow arrows show the streaking artifacts due to gating induced undersampling when parallel imaging and compressed sensing were not applied. Figure 3 shows the motion-resolved images of all the motion states (from left to right) from the same dataset, and they also show greatly improved sharpness over the traditional reconstructions. Soft-gating with L1-ESPIRiT has qualitatively improved SNR than each motion state of motion-resolved result, while motion-resolved results provide all the motion states for comprehensive evaluations. Figure 4 shows the comparison of traditional reconstructions with the soft-gating reconstruction on a cystic fibrosis patient. Figure 5 shows clinical examples of a 4 mm pulmonary nodule (as green circle indicates) and cystic fibrosis (as the red circle indicates).

Conclusion

In our study, DC based self-gating was reliable in extracting motion signal from MR data. Both soft-gating and motion resolved techniques addressed the motion issues for pulmonary imaging effectively. Given the optimized 3D­ ­UTE sequence combined with the optimized reconstruction, MRI could become a clinical standard for pulmonary imaging. In the spirit of reproducible research, we will provide the corresponding reconstruction code online in BART. 7

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] Johnson KM, et al. MRM 2013; 70(5):1241–1250. [2] Larson AC, et al. MRM 2004 Jan; 51(1): 93–102. [3] Brau AC, Brittain JH. MRM 2006 Feb;55(2):263-70. [4] Cheng JY, et al. JMRI 2014; 2014. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24785. [5] Li F, et al. MRM 2015; DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25665. [6] Uecker M, et al. MRM 2014; 71:990–1001; [7] BART: 10.5281/zenodo.31907.

Figures

Reconstruction and motion correction model for soft-gating and motion-resolved L1-ESPIRiT

Comparison of soft-gating L1-ESPIRiT reconstruction with non-gated/gated gridding reconstruction (performed on a healthy volunteer)

Motion resolved L1-ESPIRiT reconstruction performed on a healthy volunteer (images of different motion states are displayed from left to right). Video can be found at: https://youtu.be/Ms71chEhtDI

Comparison of soft-gating L1-ESPIRiT reconstruction with non-gated/gated gridding reconstruction (performed on a cystic fibrosis patient)

Pulmonary nodules as the green circle points out (left) and cystic fibrosis as the red circle points out (right)



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1139