Aurélien Massire1,2,3, Manuel Taso1,2,3,4, Maxime Guye1,2, Jean-Philippe Ranjeva1,2,3, and Virginie Callot1,2,3
1Centre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale (CRMBM), UMR 7339, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France, 2Centre d'Exploration Métabolique par Résonance Magnétique (CEMEREM), Hôpital de la Timone, Pôle d’imagerie médicale, AP-HM, Marseille, France, 3iLab-Spine - Laboratoire international - Imagerie et Biomécanique du rachis, Marseille, France, 4LBA, UMR T24, Aix-Marseille Université, IFSTTAR, Marseille, France
Synopsis
A high-resolution multi-parametric MRI protocol
dedicated to 7T cervical spinal cord (SC) investigation using a commercial
prototype transceiver radiofrequency coil array is proposed. This work pushes
forward SC quantitative MRI by reporting T1/T2/T2*
relaxation times mapping as well as diffusion tensor imaging metrics at the C3 cervical
level on a cohort of ten healthy volunteers. Automatic segmentation and
registration of these multi-parametric acquisitions to SC templates enable
group studies with quantitative evaluation within regional WM tracts and GM
horns never reported so far at 7T.
This study lays
the groundwork for improved characterization of
degenerative SC pathologies at ultra-high field.Introduction
Although quantitative MRI (qMRI) techniques have
proven huge potentials to provide information about spinal cord (SC) pathologies
from both microstructural and functional perspectives [1], there is still a strong need for pathological biomarkers
and predictive factors of accurate prognosis.
By enabling very high image resolution and enhanced tissue contrast
acquisitions, ultra-high field (UHF) imaging offers new opportunities to investigate
neurological diseases, as recently demonstrated in the brain [2]. In the SC, only
few studies have been conducted so far, mainly reporting advantages for anatomical
description [3,4].
The present work
pushes forward SC qMRI at 7T by evaluating T
1, T
2 and T
2*
relaxation times as well as fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivities (λ
//,
λ
^, MD), on a cohort of
ten healthy volunteers. The SNR available at 7T was traded to achieve very high
in-plane and 3D spatial resolution compared to conventional clinical imaging, thereby
enabling fine SC substructure findings. Furthermore, automatic segmentation and
registration of these multi-parametric acquisitions to SC templates enabled group studies with quantitative evaluation of regional WM tracts
and GM horns. Such high-resolution morphometric and structural data pave the
way for future clinical SC qMRI at UHF.
Methods
- Whole-body actively-shielded 7T system with an eight-channel transceiver cervical SC coil array.
- Ten healthy volunteers (22±2 years) scanned with
approval of the local Ethic Committee.
- Anatomical imaging: sagittal 2D T2-weighted
(T2-w) TSE sequence (0.6x0.6x2 mm3) used for accurate
axial positioning.
- Relaxometry mapping: coronal 3D T1-w
MP2RAGE sequence (0.7x0.7x0.7 mm3, C1-C7 coverage), axial 2D T2*-w
GRE sequence with multiple TEs (0.18x0.18x3 mm3, 12 slices) and
TE-stepped axial 2D T2-w segmented spin echo EPI sequences (4 TE, 0.8x0.8x3
mm3, 12 slices, pulse triggered) at the C3 level.
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI): two opposite phase-encoding
acquisitions using a single-shot EPI sequence (0.8x0.8x3 mm3, b-values:
(0,800) s/mm2, 12 slices, 12 directions, pulse triggered) at the C3
level.
- Total acquisition time, including system adjustments
(B0 shimming, B1+ calibration): 50 min/subject.
- Image post-processing (see Figure 1): semi-automated,
using the Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT)
[5], Matlab (The Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) & FSL (FMRIB, Oxford, UK).
- Quantification within specific WM [6] and GM regions
of interest (ROIs) at the C3 cervical level: after registrations of all
parameter maps within a common reference space (MNI-Poly-AMU template [7]), non-linear co-registrations with the AMU40 template [8], and arithmetic
sum on all subjects.
- Statistical analyses: paired t-test and HSD
Tukey-Kramer test with JMP9 (SAS, Cary, USA) (p-values <0.05 significant).
Results
Figure 2.a exhibits MP2RAGE-derived T
1-w
image (sagittal view), where spatial coverage of the coil from cerebellum to the
T1 level can be appreciated. Corresponding T
1 map (Figure 2.b) is
directly computed with Bloch equation. Figure 2.c and 2.d show sagittal TSE and
axial GRE acquisitions. By combining high SNR and CNR, the sum of squares of
all GRE echoes enables excellent delineation of the GM butterfly and
visualization of fine anatomical details (see zoom). Resulting average maps (Figure
3), where GM butterfly (T
1, T
2*-w images: 3.d
and 3.e / T
1, T
2*, and FA maps: 3.a, 3.f and
3.h) and cord parenchyma (T
2 and MD maps: 3.g and 3.i) can be
clearly visualized, enable group study within specific ROIs (3.b and 3.c). Quantitative
results (T
1, T
2, T
2*, λ
^, λ
//, FA and MD) at C3 cervical
level in all ROIs are summarized in Figure 4. Statistical differences were
observed between WM and GM structures (see table). FA, λ
^ and λ
// measurements also showed
statistical differences between motor pyramidal tracts and sensitive
gracile/cuneate tracts.
Conclusion
A high-resolution multi-parametric MRI protocol
dedicated to 7T cervical SC investigation using a commercial prototype transceiver
radiofrequency coil array is proposed. For the first time, high-resolution qMRI
data including T
1/T
2/T
2* relaxation times
mapping and DTI metrics are reported (C3 level):
clear delineation of the SC substructures (WM/GM) and regional statistical
differences could be observed (sensory/motor tracts, anterior GM).
Such ultra-high-field multi-parametric MR protocol opens great perspectives for
further clinical investigations of SC degenerative and traumatic diseases. Further
developments will focus on protocols enabling multiple level investigations,
construction of high-resolution 7T SC templates and parallel transmission pulse
designs to release full potential of the coil.
Acknowledgements
Fundings: ANR-11-EQPX-0001, A*MIDEX-EI-13-07-130115-08.38-7T-AMISTART & A*MIDEX ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02.References
[1] Wheeler-Kingshott et al., Neuroimage 84, 2014. [2] van
der Zwaag et al., NMR Biomed, 2015. [3] Sigmund et al., NMR Biomed 25, 2012. [4] Dula et al., Mult Scler,
2015. [5] Cohen-Adad et al., OHBM, 2014. [6] Lévy et al., Neuroimage 119, 2015. [7] Fonov et al.,
Neuroimage 102, 2014. [8] Taso et al., Neuroimage 117, 2015.