Fully-integrated T1, T2, T2*, white and gray matter atlases of the spinal cord
Benjamin De Leener1, Manuel Taso2,3, Vladimir Fonov4, Arnaud Le Troter2,3, Nikola Stikov1,5, Louis Collins4, Virginie Callot2,3, and Julien Cohen-Adad1,6

1Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Centre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale (CRMBM), UMR 7339, Aix-Marseille Université (AMU), CNRS, Marseille, France, 3Centre d'Exploration Métabolique par Résonance Magnétique (CEMEREM), Hôpital de la Timone, AP-HM, Marseille, France, 4Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

Synopsis

The spinal cord MRI community currently lacks a standard reference template covering the entire cord, therefore hindering the feasibility of large multi-center studies. Here, we propose the MNI-Poly-AMU50, the first MRI template of the entire spinal cord and brainstem, based on 50 subjects, available for multiple contrasts (T1-, T2- and T2*-weighted), and integrating probabilistic atlases of the white and gray matter. These templates provide a common framework for co-registering multi-parametric data. All developments are freely available as part of the Spinal Cord Toolbox.

Purpose

Spinal cord MRI has great potential for the diagnosis and prognosis of neurodegenerative and traumatic diseases. However, processing of spinal cord MRI data is challenging due to the lack of standard tools and guidelines1. Particularly, a standard reference space (template) would facilitate multi-center and large group studies, and would avoid user bias when quantifying MR data into small regions of the spinal cord. Recently, we introduced the MNI-Poly-AMU template, based on T2-weighted data from 16 subjects, covering C1 to T8 vertebral levels2. In this manuscript, we propose the MNI-Poly-AMU50, an unbiased left-right symmetric template based on 50 subjects, available for T1-, T2- and T2*-weighted MR contrast, that cover the entire spinal cord and brainstem, and that is merged with a probabilistic white and gray matter atlas3.

Methods

50 healthy subjects (mean age: 27+-7 y.o., 31 men and 19 women) were scanned in Montreal (n=33) and Marseille (n=17) on 3T systems (TIM Trio and Verio, Siemens Healthcare) using the standard head, neck and spine coils. Each subject had a 3D T1-weighted (T1w) and T2-weighted (T2w) scan covering the full spinal cord and brainstem. This large coverage was achieved by acquiring two FOVs per contrast (1: head and cervical spine; 2: cervical, thoracic and lumbar cord), stitched together using off-line software tools provided by the manufacturer’s MRI console after correcting for image bias field. Acquisition parameters are presented in Figure 1. Total acquisition time was 22 min. Pre-processing for template generation is illustrated in Figure 2 and included (i) stitching of images, (ii) cropping to cover from brainstem to L2/L3 level, (iii) extraction of spinal cord centerline using PropSeg4, (iv) robust slice-based non-linear normalization of spinal cord intensity (average set to 1000), (v) straightening the image using multi-dimensional b-spline interpolation, (vi) unidimensional b-spline-based vertebral alignment using an average model of vertebral distance5 based on the manual labeling of the following landmarks: rostral pons (RP), pontomedullary junction (PMJ), and intervertebral disks from C2 to L1. Template creation: Following pre-processing of the 50 T1w and 50 T2w straight images of the spinal cord, unbiased left-right symmetric templates were independently constructed using hierarchical group-wise image-registration method described in 6. Following template creation, both T1w and T2w templates were co-registered and the final template space was computed so as to correspond to the middle deformation point between T1w and T2w template. Parameters were: two-step diffeomorphic transformation (greedy SyN), mutual information metric, 100x100 iterations. Then, the T2*-weighted template and the white and gray matter probabilistic atlases were merged to the template as in 2. We established a proof-of-concept by first registering the proposed template on a T2w image from one healthy subject (female, 23-year-old) using the Spinal Cord Toolbox7, then registering the T2w image with a diffusion MRI image, which has been resampled to 1x1x1 mm3, and finally extracting diffusion metric (here fractional anisotropy) into white and gray matter regions averaged over specific vertebral levels (C5-T2 and T5-T9). Dice coefficient between manual segmentation and registered template segmentation was calculated to assess the registration accuracy. This proof-of-concept can be fully reproduced using the script available at http://www.neuro.polymtl.ca/downloads.

Results

Figure 3 shows both generated templates with overlay vertebral labeling as well as white and gray matter atlases. Each template has 200x200x1100 voxels of 0.5x0.5x0.5 mm3 resolution and is oriented as Right-to-Left/Posterior-to-Anterior/Inferior-to-Superior (RPI). Figure 4 shows the results of registration of anatomical and diffusion MRI data with the template as well as FA measures extracted in gray and white matter for specific vertebral levels. Note that the poor resolution and SNR of the FA image introduce a high bias in white matter measurements due to CSF contamination. However, despite this poor resolution issue, SCT managed to correctly register the MNI-Poly-AMU50 template and atlases on the diffusion MRI data and extract useful MR metrics. Dice coefficient between registered template spinal cord segmentation and manual segmentation of subject’s T2-weighted image was 0.79.

Discussion and conclusion

We created an unbiased symmetric T1- and T2-weighted template of the brainstem and spinal cord, based on 50 subjects. Furthermore, we demonstrated the ability of the Spinal Cord Toolbox to register new data to this template and to extract useful MRI metrics into specific regions of the spinal cord (e.g., white and gray matter, selected vertebral levels). These templates provide a common framework for co-registering multi-parametric data and hence facilitate the conduction of multi-center and large group studies. All these developments are part of the Spinal Cord Toolbox7. Further developments will include atlases of white matter pathways8 and gray matter sub-regions in the template, as well as probabilistic atlases of spinal levels9.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Julien Touati and Tanguy Magnan for their help in the development of this template. This study supported by the Polytechnique MEDITIS program, the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR FDN-143263), the Sensorimotor Rehabilitation Research Team (SMRRT), the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS 28826), the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies (FRQNT 2015-PR-182754), Quebec Bio-Imaging Network (QBIN) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering research Council of Canada (NSERC).

References

1. Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Stroman PW, Schwab JM, et al. The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: Applications. Neuroimage 2013;84:1082–1093.

2. Taso M, Le Troter A, Sdika M, et al. Construction of an in vivo human spinal cord atlas based on high-resolution MR images at cervical and thoracic levels: preliminary results. MAGMA 2014;27(3):257–267.

3. De Leener B, Kadoury S, Cohen-Adad J. Robust, accurate and fast automatic segmentation of the spinal cord. Neuroimage 2014;98:528–536.

4. Ullmann E, Pelletier Paquette JF, Thong WE, Cohen-Adad J. Automatic labeling of vertebral levels using a robust template-based approach. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2014;2014:719520.

5. Fonov V, Evans AC, Botteron K, et al. Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. Neuroimage 2011;54(1):313–327.

6. Fonov VS, Le Troter A, Taso M, et al. Framework for integrated MRI average of the spinal cord white and gray matter: The MNI-Poly-AMU template. Neuroimage 2014;102P2:817–827.

7. Cohen-Adad J, De Leener B, Benhamou M, et al. Spinal Cord Toolbox: an open-source framework for processing spinal cord MRI data. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of OHBM, Hamburg, Germany. 2014 p. 3633.

8. Lévy S, Benhamou M, Naaman C, et al. White matter atlas of the human spinal cord with estimation of partial volume effect. Neuroimage 2015;119(0):262–271.

9. Cadotte DW, Cadotte A, Cohen-Adad J, et al. Characterizing the location of spinal and vertebral levels in the human cervical spinal cord. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2014;36:803–810.

Figures

Figure 1. Acquisition parameters.

Figure 2. Template creation process. Pre-processing includes stitching, cropping, centerline extraction, intensity normalization and straightening. Then all images are registered into the same space and vertebrae are aligned. Finally, the templates are generated using a hierarchical group-wise registration and are co-registered to produce the final template space.

Figure 3. Results of template creation: frontal and sagittal views of both T1w and T2w templates, with vertebral labelling. Right: axial view of multiple slices of T1w, T2w, T2*w templates as well as spinal cord and CSF segmentation, and GM/WM atlases.

Figure 4. Results of template registration on one healthy subject (anatomical and diffusion MRI data). Fractional anisotropy, extracted from diffusion data, were extracted into gray and white matter for specific vertebral levels.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1129