Zdenko van Kesteren1, Daniƫl Tekelenburg1,2, Oliver Gurney-Champion1,3, Aart Nederveen3, Eelco Lens1, Astrid van der Horst1, Aleksandra Biegun2, and Arjan Bel1
1radiotherapy, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2KVI-Center for Advanced Radiation Technology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 3radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Synopsis
We developed a respiratory-correlated 4DMRI for
abdominal imaging by retrospective sorting 2D T2-weighted TSE images. Each
image is assigned to a respiratory state, which is either binned in phase or the
amplitude domain. The diaphragm motion per image was determined by registering
the diaphragm to the begin-inhale image of a series. Per slice and per bin
multiple images were acquired and we defined the intra-bin variation as the
standard deviation of diaphragm positions. Amplitude binning results in lower
intra-bin variation with respect to phase binning, 0.8 versus 2.4 mm
respectively.Objective
In abdominal radiotherapy, respiratory-correlated
4DCT is currently the gold standard for motion controlled imaging of highly
mobile tumors. The main drawbacks of such CTs are poor soft tissue contrast and
dose burden for the patient. This research aims to develop and validate an
accurate 4DMRI method within a clinically relevant acquisition time and T2-weighted
contrast for imaging abdominal structures by retrospective sorting of images.
Methods
We developed a
4DMRI method by alternating a fast (0.6 seconds per 2D slice) T2-weighted turbo
spin echo (TSE) image acquisition (resolution: 1.3 x 1.6 mm²; 5 mm slice thickness)
with a 1D navigator acquisition. The navigator obtained the diaphragm position
prior to each slice acquisition. During 6 minutes of free breathing, slices
were acquired continuously, yielding 60 image frames per slice over a volume of
11 slices.
After the acquisition, each image was coupled to a navigator
signal and assigned to a respiratory state by either phase or amplitude
binning. The resulting 4DMRI consisted of 110 assigned image states (10 bins,
11 slices).
For phase binning,
bins were determined by dividing each end-exhale peak to peak position into ten
evenly distributed bins (figure 1). For amplitude binning, bins were determined
according to the range in diaphragm positions determined by the navigator. The range
was defined per volunteer and divided into ten bins. The minima and maxima were
the mean diaphragm position at end-inhale and end-exhale, respectively. Data
from outside this range was deleted. The two strategies were used to
reconstruct 4DMRI images for 10 volunteers (7 female, mean age 28 years)
obtained on a 3T scanner.
The position and superior–inferior
(SI) motion of the diaphragm were quantified by registering the diaphragm to
the begin-inhale image of a series (bin 1). Sorting images into respiratory
bins often resulted in multiple images assigned to the same state. From this
set, the image with the median diaphragm position was selected for 4DMRI
reconstruction and the standard deviations (SD) of positions were calculated.
Sometimes, when no images were assigned to a state, an incomplete 4DMRI
resulted. The 4DMRIs were evaluated on data completeness (filled states of
4DMRI data set) and intra-bin variation of diaphragm position (mean SD and
maximum SD). The variation was calculated over all bins from the three central slices
that covered the largest diaphragm motion. The Wilcoxon’s signed rank test was
used to test the difference between the two methods.
In order to assess
relation between scan time and data completeness, we measured 200 dynamics for
a single volunteer and reconstructed multiple 4DMRIs from subsets of these
dynamics and evaluated the data completeness per reconstruction.
Results
4DMRI data sets
were acquired using a T2-weighted sequence, facilitating abdominal tissue
contrast.
Figure 2 shows the
relation between the number of dynamics used in the 4DMRI reconstruction versus
the data completeness. For this volunteer, data completeness reaches 90% at 60
dynamics for amplitude binning after which the increase of completeness reaches
a plateau.
Figure 3 shows a
coronal slice of a 4DMRI in one respiratory state corresponding to bin 7. The
sagittal reconstruction demonstrates a continuous diaphragm for the amplitude
binning method in contrast to a discontinuous shape for the phase binned
reconstruction. Generally, the spread on diaphragm position was smaller for the
amplitude binning than for the phase binning (difference of 1.6 (3.8) mm for
mean (max) SD, both statistically significant with p<0.01) as shown in Table 1. Phase binning resulted in a more complete (4.9%) dataset. For one volunteer
for a central slice the diaphragm position variation per respiratory bin is
shown in Figure 4, demonstrating the lower intra-bin variation for amplitude
binning compared to phase binning. The median image per bin was used for 4DMRI
reconstruction and depicts a smooth respiratory signal.
Discussion
With respect to
intra-bin variability, amplitude binning is superior to phase binning. However,
phase binning can be acquired in a shorter period given a certain data
completeness. For the purpose of accurate tumor delineation, we preferred the amplitude
binning method which resulted in a 90% data completeness for a 6 minute
acquisition.
Amplitude binning can
lead to 4DMRI that can be implemented in the clinical workflow using
commercially available sequences. The
superior contrast compared to the gold standard in radiotherapy, 4DCT, provides
the opportunity for better target definition for treatment.
Conclusion
We demonstrated
the reconstruction of accurate respiratory-correlated 4DMRI as an alternative
for 4DCT by creating fast T2-weighted 4D volumetric images.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
No reference found.