Non-Iterative Motion-Error Regularized Reconstruction for Efficient Respiratory Gating with Auto-Calibrating Parallel Imaging
Peng Lai1, Joseph Yitan Cheng2, Shreyas S Vasanawala2, and Anja C.S Brau3

1Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, CA, United States, 2Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 3Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany

Synopsis

Respiratory gating (RG) is commonly used for free-breathing 3D MRI. Conventional RG based on acceptance/rejection performs hard-threshholding on acquired data and suffers from either increased motion corruption with a large acceptance window or long scan time/increased undersampling artifacts with a small window. This work developed a non-iterative respiratory soft-threshholding method by incorporating the motion-induced error into autocalibrating parallel imaging (ac-PI). The proposed method showed more effective motion suppression on free-breathing 3D cine than conventional respiratory gating on the same datasets. This method can be generalized to suppress other types of motion with full acquisition or ac-PI as well.

Purpose

Many 3D MRI acquisitions necessitate free-breathing imaging for high resolution and large volumetric coverage and thus require efficient respiratory gating (RG) to suppress adverse motion effects. Conventional RG is performed by selection of an acceptance window (AW) for acceptance/rejection of data acquisition. Such a hard-threshholding scheme fully accepts data within the AW ignoring intra-window motion corruption and completely rejects out-of-AW data discarding their potential for improving reconstruction. Theoretically, respiratory soft gating (RSG) [1] that utilizes data with respiratory-position-based soft-thresholding can more efficiently suppress motion. However, RSG enforces soft-threshholding as a data consistency constraint and thus is limited to iterative processing with intensive computation. This work aimed to develop a non-iterative solution based on motion-error regularization for conventional auto-calibrating parallel imaging (ac-PI).

Theory

ac-PI synthesizes missing k-space data from neighboring source k-space data (Sj, j=1,2,…). The reconstruction weights, x, for a synthesis pattern are calculated by solving Ax=b (1) [2], with A and b for the source and target calibration data matrixes, respectively. x is calculated by minimizing the L2-norm error of ||Ax-b||2 (2). The j-th column in A, A.,j, is comprised of concatenated calibration data with a k-space shifting corresponding to Sj in reconstruction. In free breathing imaging, Sj is collected with motion displacement and, accordingly, A.,j needs to be updated with A.,j+e.,j to calculate the optimal x in the existence of motion, where ej represents the change in calibration data with the corresponding motion of Sj. Alternatively, according to equation 1, motion at Sj would increase the L2-norm error by δj=xjŸ||e.,j||2 and the entire reconstruction error due to motion can then be approximated by Σ(δj). Therefore, the original ac-PI equation in (2) turns to min(||Ax-b||2+||Δx||2) (3), where Δ is a diagonal matrix with Δj,j=sqrt(δj). This is the well-known Tikhonov regularization with an analytical solution: x=(ATA+ΔTΔ)-1ATb (4). Equation 4 in effect reduces xj for “bad” data with large δj to suppress motion (min||Δx||2) and accordingly increases xj for “good” data with small δj to improve data fitting (min||Ax-b||2).

Methods

The proposed Motion-Error Regularized Ac-PI (MERA) method is validated in free-breathing 3D cardiac CINE with k-t sampling and a pseudo-random vieworder. Acquisition of center 8% k-space was repeated by a factor of 4 for estimating Δ as follows (Fig.1). From the simultaneously recorded respiratory bellow signal, we generate a respiratory histogram and derive the most consistent position near end-expiration (PEE) and end-inspiration (PEI). In the repeatedly acquired center k-space, we generate two datasets at PEE (KEE) and PEI (KEI), respectively. The motion-induced error from PEE to PEI, ||KEE-KEI||2, is calculated. Then, δP at a respiratory position, P, is estimated by δP= ||KEE-KEI||2Ÿ(P-PEE)/(PEI-PEE), assuming δP increases linearly with off-PEE displacement. Note that different coil channels sense motion differently and create different δ’s (e.g. lower for elements near dorsal and higher for elements near chest wall). Therefore, ||KEE-KEI||2 is calculated individually for each coil channel to generate coil-specific δP‘s.

3D CINE was scanned on 4 healthy volunteers during free-breathing with 5× acceleration on a GE 3T (MR750). Data were processed using a k-t ac-PI method, kat ARC [3]. Static-tissue-removal (SSR) [4] was used to first identify and remove signals from static tissues (e.g. chest wall, dorsal) in the original data to improve kat ARC at high acceleration. The static tissue image was generated from a time-projection dataset with weighted averaging based on δP to obtain motion-suppressed reconstruction in static tissues. Next, in kat ARC, all k-space lines, including the acquired to correct motion corruption from acquisition, are synthesized based on equation 4 and Δ is constructed based on the P of each source line for each synthesis and the prior-calculated δP. Because each k-space neighborhood contains a mix of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ data, equation 4 synthesizes each line in the entire k-space with an optimal balance (min overall L2-norm error) between data fitting and motion suppression.

Results

As shown in Fig.2, MERA effectively suppresses motion ghosting and edge blurring that is apparent without gating. In comparison, conventional RG with an AW of 50% on the same dataset shows visible aliasing and motion artifacts. RG suffers from either increasing aliasing with smaller AW or increasing motion with larger AW. In the case of Fig.3, MERA suppresses motion in free-breathing acquisition and provides heart delineation similar to breathholding.

Discussion

This work incorporates a simplified model-error model into ac-PI and derived a new non-iterative respiratory soft gating technique. The proposed method can more effectively suppress motion than conventional RG. Our experiments show that MERA can also apply to full acquisition and non-k-t ac-PI and be used to suppress cardiac motion.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] Cheng YJ, JMRI 2014; [2] Griswood M, MRM 2005; [3] Lai P, ISMRM 2009; [4] Lai P, ISMRM 2013

Figures

Fig 1. Estimating ||motion error||2 from data acquisition

Fig 2. Reconstruction using no gating (a), MERA (b) & RG with 50% AW (c) from the same dataset

Fig 3. Non-gating (a), MERA (b) & breathhold (c) images from the same subject



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1092