Nathan P Skinner1,2,3, Shekar N Kurpad3,4, Brian D Schmit5, L Tugan Muftuler3, and Matthew D Budde3,4
1Biophysics Graduate Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 2Medical Scientist Training Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 3Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 4Clement J. Zablocki Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States
Synopsis
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is frequently applied to
spinal cord injury, yet suffers from poor detection of axonal integrity changes
caused by conflicting extracellular processes.
A double diffusion encoding (DDE) sequence was developed for the spinal
cord to remove non-neuronal signal contribution by applying a strong diffusion
weighting perpendicular to the spinal cord. A parallel diffusion gradient then sampled diffusivity along the spinal cord. Application
in a rat model showed DDE parameters outperformed DTI in sensitivity to injury
severity with substantially reduced acquisition and post-processing time. Thus, this technique shows potential for rapid,
sensitive determination of spinal cord injury severity.Purpose
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
is a common technique for evaluating microstructural changes in spinal cord
injury (SCI), but cannot adequately resolve diffusion markers of axonal
integrity, the most direct marker of functional status
1, from
confounding changes related to edema and inflammation
2. While more advanced models can isolate the
axonal component
3,4,5, imaging duration and post-processing
requirements limit clinical feasibility.
A double diffusion encoding (DDE) scheme has been devised specifically to
evaluate axonal integrity following SCI while reducing scan duration and minimizing
post processing. In-vivo comparison of standard
DTI metrics with DDE parameters was performed in a rat model of SCI.
Methods
All diffusion data were
collected using a Bruker 9.4T Biospec imaging system. DTI images were acquired
with a standard PGSE sequence with gradient duration (δ) of 8.25 ms and
separation (Δ) of 12.5 ms, using a 4-shot, respiratory gated EPI sequence
(TR/TE = 1500/28 ms) consisting of 30 directions and 3 b-values (500, 1000, and
2000 s/mm2). Images had an
in-plane resolution of 0.20 mm2 (128x128) and a slice thickness of
1.0 mm. Acquisition time was approximately 65 minutes.
DDE was implemented with two
pairs of Stejskal-Tanner gradients (Fig. 1) with δ/Δ = 12/6 ms for each
gradient pair. The first gradient pair (“filter”)
was applied perpendicular to the spinal cord to attenuate non-neuronal tissue
signal. The second diffusion weighted direction (“probe”) was aligned parallel
to the spinal cord to sample axial diffusion. An EPI sequence implementation (TR/TE
= 1750/51.07 ms) was performed using a b=4000 s/mm2 filter and 5
probe b-values from 0-1000 s/mm2 (20 minute acquisition). Another
implementation using a Point RESolved Spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence (TR/TE = 3000/42.26 ms) was developed to acquire a single 10x10x6 mm3 voxel
with a b=2000 s/mm2 filter and 9 probe b-values ranging from 0-2000
s/mm2. Acquisition time was
approximately 3 minutes.
In naïve rats, DTI
and DDE-EPI sequences were acquired with a quadrature Litz coil (Doty
Scientific) in the cervical spinal cord (n=3). For the rat injury model, a
weight drop contusion at the T10 vertebral level was performed with severe,
moderate, mild, and sham (control) severities (n=14). At 48 hours post-injury, DTI and DDE-PRESS
diffusion data were acquired at the lesion epicenter with a 4-channel surface
coil array (Bruker).
Six DTI slices covering the extent of the DDE
voxel were used to compare injury diffusion metrics.
Images
were motion and eddy current corrected, then DTI parameters calculated using weighted linear least squares fitting. Whole-cord regions of interest were used to
obtain Fractional Anisotropy (FA), Mean Diffusivity (MD), Axial Diffusivity
(AD), and Radial Diffusivity (RD) averages.
For DDE data, the integral of the magnitude data was fit using a
monoexponetial model to derive axial diffusivity (ADDDE) while a biexponential
fit that included a slower restricted diffusion term was used to derive slow
diffusivity (Dslow) and the signal fraction with this restricted diffusion
(fR). Injury effect analyzed with ANOVA and regression analyses.
Results
Analysis of signal decay in
tissues surrounding the spinal cord demonstrated that non-neural tissue is
attenuated with a b-value >2000 s/mm2 (not shown). The filter did
not significantly alter AD values in a naïve rat (Fig. 2) and showed no difference between
the EPI and PRESS acquisition methods (Fig. 3).
ANOVA to detect the main injury
effect showed no significance in the DTI parameters at 48 hours, while
DDE-derived ADDDE and fR showed a significant effect
(Fig.4). Regression analysis of injury biomechanics (Fig. 5) and functional
testing (not shown) showed similar significance in DDE metrics while DTI
measurements showed no significance.
Discussion
The alignment of fibers in the
spinal cord allows attenuation of non-neuronal signal while preserving that of
the spinal cord using a strong perpendicular diffusion weighting. By combining this with multiple parallel
diffusion weightings, estimates of AD can be achieved using a reduced number of
directions that in a healthy, naïve rat agree with those achieved using
standard DTI methods. Furthermore, as signal of non-interest is removed, a
spectroscopic readout allows a whole-cord calculation of diffusivity values
without involved and subjective ROI analysis.
The closer association of DDE
metrics with injury severity is thought to be related to the attenuation of
extracellular fluid (edema), thus resulting in signal with a greater fraction
of the axonal component. Functional analyses
also show significant association with these measurements, demonstrating potential
as a rapid injury assessment tool.
Conclusions
DDE applied to SCI provides a
substantial decrease in acquisition time while improving the detection of
injury severity in a rat model. This has
potential applications for a fast determination of injury severity in
preclinical or clinical applications.
Acknowledgements
This project was partially funded through the Research and
Education Initiative Fund, a component of the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin
endowment at the Medical College of Wisconsin, the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation,
and the Department of Veterans Affairs. NS is a member of the Medical Scientist
Training Program at MCW, which is partially supported by a training grant from
NIGMS T32-GM080202. Support from the Bryon Riesch Paralysis Foundation is
gratefully acknowledged. We thank Sean McGarry, Kyle Stehlik, and Natasha Beucher for
experimental assistance.References
1. Medana IM, Esiri MM. Brain
2003.
2. Skinner et al. NMR Biomed
2015.
3. Fieremans et al. Am J
Neuroradiol 2013.
4. Grussu et al. NeuroImage
2015.
5. Wang et al. Brain 2011.