The lifespan trajectory of white matter microstructure detected by NODDI
Jiaying Zhang1, Aurobrata Ghosh1, Daniel C Alexander1, and Gary Hui Zhang1

1Computer Science and Centre for medical image computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Synopsis

The structure and function of human brain evolve across the lifespan. The microstructural white matter changes across lifespan have been studied using Diffusion tensor imaging. Whilst sensitive, DTI parameters have no direct tissue specificity. Here, given the availability of high-quality HCP lifespan dataset, we aim to study the lifespan trajectory of microstructural WM changes using NODDI and evaluate another NODDI fitting framework - Accelerated microstructure imaging via convex optimization (AMICO). We found U-shaped neurite density changes across lifespan and feasibility of AMICO NODDI parameters in capturing the similar lifespan trajectory as the standard fitting.

Background

Neuroimaging enables detailed investigation into the evolution of the structure and function of the human brain over its lifespan1-2. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)3 in particular has provided unique insight into the lifespan changes of white matter (WM) through its sensitivity to tissue microstructure4-9. While DTI is sensitive, the technique lacks in specificity to tissue composition. For example, changes to fractional anisotropy (FA), a common index derived from DTI, might be attributable to alterations in axonal density or axonal orientation distribution. Advances in diffusion MRI acquisition and modeling now support much more specific characterization of tissue microstructure, offering an exciting opportunity to refine our understanding of WM microstructural evolution.

Purpose

The primary aim of this work is to chart the lifespan trajectory of WM microstructure using Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI)10, a state-of-the-art multi-compartment model of diffusion, using HCP lifespan dataset (a state-of-the-art multi-shell diffusion MRI and high spatial resolution data). Our second aim is to evaluate Accelerated Microstructure Imaging via Convex Optimization (AMICO)11, a new framework to accelerate the fitting of advanced multi-compartment diffusion models (e.g., NODDI) in a practical neuroimaging application.

Methods

Subjects

6 subjects per age group (age 8-9 and 14-15) and 5 subjects per age group (age 25-35, 45-55, and 65-75) from HCP lifespan Phase 1a dataset.

MRI acquisition

The acquisition parameters were: voxel size 1.5mm isotropic; b=1000 and 2500 s/mm2, each with 75 directions; Acquisition time 21 minutes12.

Image Processing

The diffusion MRI images underwent standard HCP preprocessing pipeline13. The NODDI indices, including neurite density index (NDI), orientation dispersion index (ODI) and volume fraction of free water (FISO), were computed separately using NODDI matlab toolbox14, which implements the standard nonlinear least square algorithm, and AMICO. Spatial normalization was achieved with DTI-TK15.

Image Analysis

We extracted the mean NODDI indices of WM at two spatial levels, on WM skeleton created with FSL TBSS16 and over the core WM ROI defined as the sum of the 48 ROIs in the JHU WM altas17. The average of these indices for each age group was used to determine the lifespan trajectory. Correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate the NODDI indices from AMICO against the standard fitting.

Results

Lifespan trajectory of NODDI indices on the WM skeleton and core WM ROI

At both spatial levels (Figures 1a-1b), NDI showed a clear pattern of inverted U shape over lifespan, increasing from the childhood, plateauing around the early adulthood, then decreasing following the late adulthood. ODI showed a more stable pattern throughout the lifespan (Figures 1e-1f). FISO varied little before 60s and its subsequent increase (Figures 1c-1d) is consistent with the onset of aging.

Evaluation of AMICO fitting across subjects

Results at both spatial level showed NODDI indices estimated by AMICO were highly consistent with the values determined by the standard fitting. Most importantly, AMICO reproduced the same lifespan trajectory as the standard fitting. For all NODDI indices on the WM skeleton, all of the R2 were over 0.97. For NDI and FISO in the core WM ROI, both of the R2 were over 0.98 while for ODI, the R2 was 0.88. Bland-Altman plots showed that AMICO estimates consistently underestimated the NODDI indices compared to the standard fitting. Nevertheless, this did not prevent AMICO from recovering the same lifespan trajectory as the standard fitting.

Required time for NODDI fitting

For the HCP lifespan dataset, the standard NODDI fitting required nearly 230 hours to complete the parameter estimation of a single subject while AMICO took about one hour. This clearly demonstrated the benefits of AMICO for large-scale studies.


Discussions

Taking advantage of the state-of-the-art HCP lifespan dataset, we showed that neurite density estimated with the NODDI model changes across the human lifespan in an inverted U shape. This is consistent with DTI findings over lifespan1-5 and extends the recent NODDI findings for brain maturation18. This study additionally demonstrated, in a neuroimaging application, that AMICO provides NODDI indices consistent with the standard fitting. Despite a slight underestimation bias, it can recover the same lifespan trajectory as the standard fitting. The results support the use of AMICO for NODDI fitting in large cohort studies where the standard NODDI fitting is impractical.

Acknowledgements

Data were provided [in part] by the Human Connectome Project, WU-Minn Consortium (Principal Investigators: David Van Essen and Kamil Ugurbil; 1U54MH091657) funded by the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research; and by the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University. Jiaying Zhang is supported by China Scholarship Council. EPSRC grants G007748 and L022680 support Daniel C Alexander, Aurobrata Ghosh, and Gary Hui Zhang’s work on this topic.

References

1. Craik, F.I.M. and E. Bialystok, Cognition through the lifespan: mechanisms of change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006. 10(3): p. 131-138.

2. Sowell, E.R., P.M. Thompson, and A.W. Toga, Mapping changes in the human cortex throughout the span of life. Neuroscientist, 2004. 10(4): p. 372-92.

3. Hasan, K.M., et al., Development and aging of the healthy human brain uncinate fasciculus across the lifespan using diffusion tensor tractography. Brain Research, 2009. 1276: p. 67-76.

4. Hasan, K.M., et al., Diffusion tensor tractography quantification of the human corpus callosum fiber pathways across the lifespan. Brain Research, 2009. 1249: p. 91-100.

5. Kochunov, P., et al., Fractional anisotropy of water diffusion in cerebral white matter across the lifespan. Neurobiology of Aging, 2012. 33(1): p. 9-20.

6. Lebel, C., et al., Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter tract evolution over the lifespan. NeuroImage, 2012. 60(1): p. 340-352.

7. Li, W., et al., Differential developmental trajectories of magnetic susceptibility in human brain gray and white matter over the lifespan. Human Brain Mapping, 2014. 35(6): p. 2698-2713.

8. Yeatman, J.D., B.A. Wandell, and A.A. Mezer, Lifespan maturation and degeneration of human brain white matter. Nat Commun, 2014. 5.

9. Basser, P.J., J. Mattiello, and D. LeBihan, MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J, 1994. 66(1): p. 259-67.

10. Zhang, H., et al., NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage, 2012. 61(4): p. 1000-16.

11. Daducci, A., et al., Accelerated Microstructure Imaging via Convex Optimization (AMICO) from diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage, 2015. 105: p. 32-44.

12. http://lifespan.humanconnectome.org/data/phase1a-pilot-parameters.html

13. Glasser, M.F., et al., The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage, 2013. 80: p. 105-24.

14. https://www.nitrc.org/projects/noddi_toolbox/;

15. Zhang, H., et al., Deformable registration of diffusion tensor MR images with explicit orientation optimization. Medical Image Analysis, 2006. 10(5): p. 764-785.

16. Smith, S.M., et al., Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage, 2006. 31(4): p. 1487-505.

17. Mori, S., et al., Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. NeuroImage, 2008. 40(2): p. 570-582.

18. Chang YS, Owen JP, Pojman NJ, Thieu T, Bukshpun P, et al. (2015) White Matter Changes of Neurite Density and Fiber Orientation Dispersion during Human Brain Maturation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10(6): e0123656.

Figures

Figure 1. The lifespan trajectory of NODDI parameters estimated by AMICO and raw model fitting. Blue represents the NODDI parameter estimated by raw model fitting while red represents the NODDI parameter estimated by AMICO.

Figure 2. The Bland-Altman plot of NODDI parameters estimated by AMICO and original fitting. Blue line represents the average difference of NODDI parameter estimated by raw model and AMICO fitting. Upper and lower red lines represent average difference ± 1.96 standard deviation of the difference.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1079