Ana Francisca Soares1, João M. N. Duarte1, Blanca Lizarbe1, and Rolf Gruetter1,2,3,4
1Laboratory of Functional and Metabolic Imaging (LIFMET), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland, 3Department of Radiology, University of Geneva (UNIGE), Geneva, Switzerland, 4Department of Radiology, University of Lausanne (Unil), Lausanne, Switzerland
Synopsis
Obesity is associated with
a loss of metabolic control, largely driven by alterations in whole-body lipid
distribution. Impaired insulin action leads to hepatic lipid accumulation and,
conversely, high levels of liver lipids also cause insulin resistance. We
followed the loss of glucose homeostasis in mice fed a high-fat diet for 18
weeks. In parallel, we assessed their hepatic lipids by 1H-MRS in vivo. In this
model, glucose intolerance preceded hepatic lipid accumulation that then
contributed to aggravate the phenotype. Moreover, fasting-induced hepatic lipid
dynamics was hampered with high-fat diet feeding.Introduction
Ectopic lipid
accumulation, notably in the liver, is a key feature of metabolic disease in
the scope of obesity. Hepatic steatosis may be both a consequence and a cause
of insulin resistance
1.
For example high-fat diet (HFD)-induced steatosis was shown to lead to hepatic
insulin resistance without perturbations in peripheral metabolism
2. On the other hand, it
is well known that insulin resistance causes hepatic lipid accumulation due to impaired
insulin action in adipocytes, namely in suppressing lipolysis
1. To help clarify the
role of hepatic lipid alterations in the development of metabolic dysregulation
in diet-induced obesity, we performed a longitudinal study where hepatic lipids
were non-invasively monitored by
1H-MRS
in vivo, in HFD-fed mice whose glucose
homeostasis was also characterized.
Methods
11-week old C57BL/6J mice were
fed either a high-fat diet (60% kcal from fat, Research Diets D12492), HFD
(N=10), or a control diet (10% kcal from fat, Research Diets D12450B), CTRL
(N=9) and monitored as depicted in figure 1. Hepatic lipid content (HLC) and
composition were estimated as previously described
3, by localized
1H-MRS
in vivo with STEAM, in a 14.1T-26cm magnet
interfaced to a Direct Drive console (VnmrJ, Agilent Technologies) using a
1H quadrature surface coil as trans-receiver. All MR acquisitions were respiration-triggered. HLC was
expressed as a percentage of total
1H signal in spectra acquired without water-suppression. Contributions of saturated-
monounsaturated- and polyunsaturated fatty-acids (SFA, MUFA and PUFA) were
resolved as shown in figure 2, using the fatty-acid composition
indices derived from water-suppressed spectra
3. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were
performed after a 6h-fasting and glycemia was monitored from tail tip samples
before the glucose gavage (1.5 g/kg) and up to 2h afterwards. Fasting insulin
was measured by ELISA immunoassay. Data are means ± SEM and were analyzed with
2-way ANOVA followed by Student
t-test for specific comparisons.
Results
Both experimental groups gained
weight throughout the study (Figure 3). Mice in HFD group developed obesity
with a 72 ± 4% increase in body weight by week 18 of the dietary regimen. In
comparison, the weight gain for CTRL group was four times smaller: 18 ± 3%. Increased
body weight in the HFD group, relative to CTRL, was observed as little as one week
after the dietary switch (P<0.01). Also within a week, HFD-mice showed
higher AUC during the OGTT, relative to controls (P<0.01). Dysregulation of
glucose homeostasis was established by week 4 with increased AUC during the
OGTT (P<0.05), 2h-post load glycemia (P<0.05), 6h-fasting glycemia
(P<0.05) and 6h-fasting insulinemia (P<0.01). These alterations preceded
hepatic lipid accumulation that was only observed by week 9, when total HLC was
3.4 ± 0.5% in HFD and 1.2 ± 0.1% in CTRL groups (P<0.001). Such lipid
accumulation resulted from increased contributions from both SFA (P<0.01) and
PUFA (P=0.01) in the HFD group relative to CTRL, while MUFA contribution was
similar between the two groups (Figure 4). Interestingly, already by week 4, despite the
similar total HLC observed between the two groups, significant alterations were
detected in the contributions of SFA (increased, P<0.01), MUFA (decreased,
P<0.01), and PUFA (increased, P<0.01), relative to controls. By week 18,
HLC ranged from 3.4 to 27.4% in the HFD group. Overnight-fasting induced in a
3-fold increase in HLC in CTRL, driven by
accumulation of both SFA and PUFA (P<0.001
vs ad libitum conditions). On the
other hand, no changes were observed in HLC after an overnight-fast in HFD-mice
although a small decrease in MUFA contribution was noted (P<0.05
vs ad
libitum conditions).
Discussion
In our experimental
setting, glucose intolerance appeared as a very early metabolic abnormality in diet-induced
obesity. Significant alterations in the contributions of SFA, MUFA and PUFA to
HLC were detected within a month of HFD feeding before frank hepatic lipid
accumulation took place. Namely, PUFA were the major contributors to increases
in HLC in HFD-fed mice. Since those species are more readily mobilized from
adipose stores when compared to SFA or MUFA
4, our finding likely reflects inappropriate
inhibition of adipose tissue lipolysis due to early perturbations in insulin
action. Indeed, contributions of PUFA, MUFA and SFA to liver lipids resembled
those found in fasted mice fed a control diet, consistent impaired insulin
action. Moreover, aggravation of insulin resistance, denoted by increased fasting
glucose and insulin levels, was observed in parallel with hepatic lipid
accumulation, stressing the link between the two events. We conclude that under
HFD-feeding initial defects in adipose tissue lipid storage (notably increased
lipolysis) lead to hepatic steatosis that itself contributes to aggravate the
loss of glucose homeostasis, namely by enhancing insulin resistance.
Acknowledgements
Supported by the
Centre d’Imagerie BioMédicale (CIBM) of the UNIL, UNIGE, HUG, CHUV, EPFL and
the Leenaards and Louis-Jeantet FoundationsReferences
1. Utzschneider KM and Khan SE. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91:4753
2. Samuel VT et al. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 32345
3. Soares AF et al. NMR Biomed. 2015;
28: 1009
4. Raclot T. Prog
Lipid Res. 2003; 42:257