Evaluation of Renal Blood flow in subjects with Diabetic Nephropathy using ASL Perfusion MRI
Lu-Ping Li1,2, Huan Tan1, Jon Thacker3, Wei Li1,2, Ying Zhou4, Orly Kohn5, Stuart Sprague2,6, and Pottumarthi V Prasad1,2

1Radiology, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States, 2Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States, 4Center for Biomedical Research & Informatics, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States, 5Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 6Medicine, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States

Synopsis

Renal blood flow is thought to be reduced in subjects of diabetic nephropathy (DN). However, there is limited amount of quantitative data on renal blood flow in patients with DN. In this study, ASL MRI data was acquired in 28 patients with diabetes and stage-3 CKD along with 30 healthy controls. Renal blood flow was found to be significantly lower in subjects with DN with a large Cohen’s d value. Renal blood flow also showed a significant correlation with eGFR and age was not found to be a significant confounder in this relationship.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health problem and associated with poor outcomes and high cost of care [1]. Current clinical classifications based on estimated glomerular fitration rate (eGFR) is not an effective marker for optimal clinical management [2]. Developing alternate markers with higher specificity for renal injury and with the ability to predict risk of progression is necessary [3]. It is increasingly accepted that DN, a common form of CKD, is associated with loss of peritubular blood flow [4].

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI is an endogenous contrast mechanism which is suitable for patients with impaired renal function. A key challenge with ASL based approach is the limited signal to noise ratio requiring multiple averages. Feasibility of 2D navigator-gated free breathing ASL technique was demonstrated recently [5]. Here, we have applied the technique to a moderate sized group of subjects with DN along with healthy controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects: Procedures were approved by local IRB with written subject consent prior to enrollment. MRI data were acquired in diabetics with stage 3 CKD (N: 28; age: 65.9 ± 9.0 yr) and healthy subjects (N: 30; age: 41.5 ± 18.4 yr). Subjects were instructed not to take NSAID for 3 days and ACEi/ARB 1 day prior to MRI and to fast after midnight before scan. Kidney function in controls was verified using serum creatinine measurement on MRI scan day.

MRI acquisition: MRI scans were performed on a 3 Tesla whole body scanner (Magnetom Verio, Siemens Healthcare). ASL imaging parameters: Flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) preparation with post labeling delay 1.5 s (control) or 2.0 s (DN); coronal slice thickness 8 mm; in-plane resolution of 1.48 x 1.48 mm2; single shot steady state free precession readout for signal reception.

MRI Analysis: ASL maps were generated using a custom image processing toolbox using Matlab. Regions of interests were manually defined in the cortex (Cor_BF) and medulla (Med_BF) using Python.

Statistical analysis: Group wise comparisons were performed using two sample T-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Cohen’s d value (> 0.8 represents large effect size; >0.5 represents medium effect size) is reported additionally. Pair-wise correlation was analyzed among ASL measurements, age, and eGFR using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Linear regression was analyzed for confounding effect of age. SAS 9.2 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA) was used and p<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Blood flow measurements are reported in units of ml/min/100g. Figure 1 illustrates ASL maps obtained from a representative healthy volunteer and a patient with DN. Table 1 is the summary of measurements in all subjects. Note a significant difference between patients with DN and healthy controls in age, eGFR, cortical and medulary blood flow (all p values <0.001 with a large effect size as estimated using Cohen’s d values). Table 2 is a summary of Spearman correlation coefficients among variables age, eGFR, Cor_BF and Med_BF. All correlations were found to be significant. Even though, both Cor_BF and Med_BF showed significant correlation with age, their relationships with eGFR were found to be not confounded by age (Tables 3 a and b). Figure 2 shows the linear regression plots with eGFR as independent and Cor_BF and Med_BF as dependent variables.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Renal blood flow is significantly reduced in patients with DN compared to controls and is consistent with previous reports with limited number of subjects [5, 6]. The p values along with the effect size suggest that renal blood flow has a high degree of sensitivity to distinguish subjects with DN from controls. This is especially interesting given that the subjects had only moderate level of CKD according to the clinical classification. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to demonstrate whether reduced blood flow in DN is predictive of progression.

Both cortical and medullary blood flow values in the control group are lower than a previous report using the same technique [5]. A key difference in the subject preparation between these two studies is that the subjects in the present study were fasted prior to the MRI scan. Further studies may be necessary to evaluate the effects of fasting on renal blood flow. While the control group was not age matched with the CKD group, we did find that the relationship between blood flow and eGFR was not confounded by age. Our sample size limited the evaluation of similar effects of race and gender. However, in a subset of subjects matched for age, race and gender (n=8 per group), both Cor_BF and Med_BF were significantly different between the groups and the correlation with eGFR remained significant.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. Shoshana Fettman, Claire Feczko, and Dana Factor for their assistance in recruiting and coordinating the study. Thanks are also due to Ms. Sally Gartman for her administrative assistance.

References

1. Trivedi H. Cost implications of caring for chronic kidney disease: are interventions cost-effective? Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010 May;17(3):265-70. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2010.03.007. Review. PubMed PMID: 20439095.

2. Tonelli M, Manns B. Supplementing creatinine-based estimates of risk inchronic kidney disease: is it time? JAMA. 2011 Apr 20;305(15):1593-5. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.502. Epub 2011 Apr 11. PubMed PMID: 21482745.

3. Macisaac RJ, Ekinci EI, Jerums G. Markers of and risk factors for the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Feb;63(2 Suppl 2):S39-62. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.10.048. Review. PubMed PMID: 24461729.

4. Zafrani L, Ince C. Microcirculation in Acute and Chronic Kidney Diseases. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jul 28. pii: S0272-6386(15)00941-5. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.06.019. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 26231789.

5. Tan H, Koktzoglou I, Prasad PV. Renal perfusion imaging with two-dimensional navigator gated arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Feb;71(2):570-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24692. PubMed PMID: 23447145; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4429520.

6. Rossi C, Artunc F, Martirosian P, Schlemmer HP, Schick F, Boss A. Histogram analysis of renal arterial spin labeling perfusion data reveals differences between volunteers and patients with mild chronic kidney disease. Invest Radiol. 2012 Aug;47(8):490-6. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318257063a. PubMed PMID: 22766911.

Figures

Figure 1. ASL maps from a patient with DN (Left) and a representative healthy subject (Right). The cortical blood flow in the two subjects are close to their respective group mean values.


Table 1. Summary of age, eGFR, Cor_BF and Med_BF from both healthy controls and patients with DN.

Table 2. Pair-wise correlation among variable age, eGFR, Cor_BF and Med_BF.

Table 3. Multiple linear regression analysis with eGFR as independent and Cor_BF (a) and Med_BF (b) as dependent variable with adjustment for age.

Figure 2. Linear regression plots for cortical (Left) and medullary (Right) blood flow vs. eGFR.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1050