Lu-Ping Li1,2, Huan Tan1, Jon Thacker3, Wei Li1,2, Ying Zhou4, Orly Kohn5, Stuart Sprague2,6, and Pottumarthi V Prasad1,2
1Radiology, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States, 2Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States, 4Center for Biomedical Research & Informatics, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States, 5Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 6Medicine, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States
Synopsis
Renal blood flow is thought to be reduced in subjects of diabetic
nephropathy (DN). However, there is
limited amount of quantitative data on renal blood flow in patients with DN. In
this study, ASL MRI data was acquired in 28 patients with diabetes and stage-3
CKD along with 30 healthy controls. Renal blood flow was found to be
significantly lower in subjects with DN with a large Cohen’s d value. Renal blood flow also showed a significant
correlation with eGFR and age was not found to be a significant confounder in
this relationship.
INTRODUCTION
Chronic
kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health problem and associated with
poor outcomes and high cost of care [1].
Current clinical classifications based on estimated glomerular fitration
rate (eGFR) is not an effective marker for optimal clinical management [2].
Developing alternate markers with higher specificity for renal injury and with
the ability to predict risk of progression is necessary [3]. It is increasingly
accepted that DN, a common form of CKD, is associated with loss of peritubular
blood flow [4].
Arterial
spin labeling (ASL) MRI is an endogenous contrast mechanism which is suitable
for patients with impaired renal function. A key challenge with ASL based
approach is the limited signal to noise ratio requiring multiple averages. Feasibility of 2D navigator-gated free
breathing ASL technique was demonstrated recently [5]. Here, we have applied
the technique to a moderate sized group of subjects with DN along with healthy
controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects: Procedures were approved by local
IRB with written subject consent prior to enrollment. MRI data were acquired in diabetics with
stage 3 CKD (N: 28; age: 65.9 ± 9.0 yr) and healthy subjects (N: 30; age: 41.5
± 18.4 yr). Subjects were instructed not to take NSAID for 3 days and ACEi/ARB
1 day prior to MRI and to fast after midnight before scan. Kidney function in controls
was verified using serum creatinine measurement on MRI scan day.
MRI acquisition: MRI scans were performed
on a 3 Tesla whole body scanner (Magnetom Verio, Siemens Healthcare). ASL
imaging parameters: Flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) preparation
with post labeling delay 1.5 s (control) or 2.0 s (DN); coronal slice thickness
8 mm; in-plane resolution of 1.48 x 1.48 mm2; single shot steady
state free precession readout for signal reception.
MRI Analysis: ASL maps were generated using a custom image processing toolbox using
Matlab. Regions of interests were manually defined in the cortex (Cor_BF) and
medulla (Med_BF) using Python.
Statistical analysis: Group wise comparisons were
performed using two sample T-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Cohen’s d value (> 0.8 represents large
effect size; >0.5 represents medium effect size) is reported additionally.
Pair-wise correlation was analyzed among ASL measurements, age, and eGFR using
Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Linear regression was analyzed for
confounding effect of age. SAS 9.2 (SAS,
Cary, NC, USA) was used and p<0.05 was regarded as statistically
significant.
RESULTS
Blood flow measurements are reported in units
of ml/min/100g. Figure 1 illustrates ASL maps obtained from a representative
healthy volunteer and a patient with DN. Table 1 is the summary of measurements
in all subjects. Note a significant difference between patients with DN and
healthy controls in age, eGFR, cortical and medulary blood flow (all
p values
<0.001 with a large effect size as estimated using Cohen’s d values). Table
2 is a summary of Spearman correlation coefficients among variables age, eGFR, Cor_BF and Med_BF. All correlations were found to be significant. Even
though, both Cor_BF and Med_BF showed significant correlation with age, their
relationships with eGFR were found to be not confounded by age (Tables 3 a and
b). Figure 2 shows the linear regression plots with eGFR as independent and
Cor_BF and Med_BF as dependent variables.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Renal
blood flow is significantly reduced in patients with DN compared to controls
and is consistent with previous reports with limited number of subjects [5, 6].
The p values along with the effect
size suggest that renal blood flow has a high degree of sensitivity to
distinguish subjects with DN from controls.
This is especially interesting given that the subjects had only moderate
level of CKD according to the clinical classification. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to
demonstrate whether reduced blood flow in DN is predictive of progression.
Both
cortical and medullary blood flow values in the control group are lower than a
previous report using the same technique [5].
A key difference in the subject preparation between these two studies is
that the subjects in the present study were fasted prior to the MRI scan. Further studies may be necessary to evaluate
the effects of fasting on renal blood flow. While the control group was not age
matched with the CKD group, we did find that the relationship between blood
flow and eGFR was not confounded by age.
Our sample size limited the evaluation of similar effects of race and
gender. However, in a subset of subjects matched for age, race and gender (n=8
per group), both Cor_BF and Med_BF were significantly different between the
groups and the correlation with eGFR remained significant.
Acknowledgements
The
authors thank Mrs. Shoshana Fettman, Claire Feczko, and Dana Factor for their
assistance in recruiting and coordinating the study. Thanks are also due to Ms.
Sally Gartman for her administrative assistance.References
1. Trivedi
H. Cost implications of caring for chronic kidney disease: are
interventions cost-effective? Adv
Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010 May;17(3):265-70. doi:
10.1053/j.ackd.2010.03.007. Review.
PubMed PMID: 20439095.
2. Tonelli M, Manns B. Supplementing creatinine-based estimates of risk inchronic kidney disease: is it time? JAMA. 2011 Apr 20;305(15):1593-5. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.502. Epub 2011 Apr 11. PubMed PMID: 21482745.
3. Macisaac
RJ, Ekinci EI, Jerums G. Markers of and risk factors for the
development and progression of
diabetic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014
Feb;63(2 Suppl 2):S39-62. doi:
10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.10.048. Review. PubMed PMID:
24461729.
4. Zafrani
L, Ince C. Microcirculation in Acute and Chronic Kidney Diseases. Am J
Kidney Dis. 2015 Jul 28. pii:
S0272-6386(15)00941-5. doi:
10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.06.019. [Epub
ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 26231789.
5. Tan
H, Koktzoglou I, Prasad PV. Renal perfusion imaging with two-dimensional
navigator gated arterial spin
labeling. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Feb;71(2):570-9.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.24692. PubMed
PMID: 23447145; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4429520.
6. Rossi
C, Artunc F, Martirosian P, Schlemmer HP, Schick F, Boss A. Histogram
analysis of renal arterial spin
labeling perfusion data reveals differences
between volunteers and patients
with mild chronic kidney disease. Invest Radiol.
2012 Aug;47(8):490-6. doi:
10.1097/RLI.0b013e318257063a. PubMed PMID: 22766911.