Ashley Pumphrey1, Zhengshi Yang2, Shaojing Ye2, Ahmed Abdel-Latif2, and Moriel Vandsburger3
1CVRC, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States, 2University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States, 3Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
Synopsis
We developed a cardiac specific chemical exchange saturation transfer pulse sequence and applied it to the tracking of cell survival/proliferation or rejection in murine models of cardiac cell therapy. Purpose
Research
into cell therapies for cardiac regeneration is stymied by an inability to
track in vivo cell survival,
proliferation, and differentiation. MRI tracking of iron oxide nanoparticle
labeled cells following cardiac implantation has been explored, however
concerns of tissue retention of particles after cell death and difficulty
differentiating between labeled cells and tissue necrosis remain major
limitations. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) - MRI has been used
to image cells labeled with paraCEST contrast agents1 or cells
expressing CEST active reporter genes2 in stationary organs and
tumors but not the heart. We developed a cardiorespiratory gated CEST-encoded
steady state cine pulse sequence (cardioCEST), and demonstrated the ability to
selectively visualize CEST contrast from Eu-HPDO3A labeled cells following
intra-myocardial implantation3. Here we examined whether cardioCEST
imaging could differentiate cell survival/proliferation from rejection in a
longitudinal mouse model of cardiac cell therapy.
Methods
Pulse Sequence Design: CEST encoding used a 2s train
of Gaussian saturation pulses (720°, B1average = 14μT, bandwidth =
200Hz, duration = 8.8ms, number of pulses = 196, offsets = ±15ppm) prior to a
constant repetition time cine gradient echo readout that was cardiorespiratory
gated (TR/TE= 7.1/3.1ms, flip angle = 10°). After each saturation 4 averages of
one phase-encode step were acquired for each cardiac phase, and dummy pulses
maintained steady state magnetization during respiratory motion. Additional
parameters were FOV=2.56x2.56cm, Matrix = 256x128, and slice thickness = 1mm.
All imaging was performed on a 7T Bruker Clinscan (Bruker, Germany) scanner
using a cylindrical volume coil for excitation and a 4-channel phased-array
surface coil for reception. Cell and
Animal Experiments: C2C12 cells derived from C3H mice were labeled with
Eu-HPDO3A via hypotonic swelling4 that yielded 22,355.67 ng(Eu)/mg
cell mass as determined by ICPMS. Implantation of ~10
6 cells into
the left ventricular wall was performed using a surgical pop-out technique5.
In order to model the survival/proliferation vs. the rejection of implanted
cells, labeled C2C12 cells were implanted into syngeneic C3H mice (survival,
n=6) or C57B6 mice (rejection, n=7). Separately, saline-labeled C2C12 cells
implanted into different C3H (n = 6) or C57B6 (n = 9) mice served as controls.
Pairs of cardioCEST images were acquired in 2-3 mid-ventricular slices per
mouse at 1, 10 and 20 days following cell implantation. Afterwards hearts were
excised and stained using hematoxylin and eosin staining. Registration of
cardioCEST image pairs was performed to account for slight movement between
acquisitions. Maps of CEST contrast were generated by matrix calculation of MTRasym
= (S
-15ppm – S
15ppm)/S
-15ppm*100. Regions of
interest in mice receiving Eu-HPDO3A labeled cells were defined in the area of
cell implantation (cell graft), and a control area in the septum. In mice
receiving saline labeled cells, one region of interest was defined in the area
of cell injection (saline graft).
Results
MTR
asym
values were similar at the sites of implanted Eu-HPDO3A labeled cells in C3H
and C57B6 mice (Figures 1, 2) at 1 day after injection. In C3H mice (proliferation
model, Figure 1), MTRasym remained higher for 20 days in areas of
implanted labeled cells compared to septal regions and saline labeled controls
(Figure 2), but decreased compared to day 1. Elevated MTR
asym in C3H
mice at day 20 was localized to areas of C2C12 cell proliferation as identified
by histology (Figure 1). In C57B6 mice (rejection model), MTR
asym in
the area of implanted cells decreased significantly within 10 days of
injection. By 20 days post injection, MTR
asym values were similar in
areas of implanted cells, control regions in the septum, and in control mice
receiving saline labeled cells (Figures 1, 2). Also, MTR
asym was
significantly (p < .01) lower in the cell graft in C57B6 mice compared to
C3H mice at 10 and 20 days after injection. Finally, graft size in C3H mice was
similar when calculated from cardioCEST images as compared to histology (Figure
3).
Discussion
Longitudinal cardioCEST imaging
enabled in vivo monitoring of cell
survival/proliferation or rejection in a mouse model of cardiac cell therapy.
Following rejection of labeled cells, Eu-HPDO3A is likely cleared from the
myocardium similar to other lanthanide-HPDO3A complexes, leading to elimination
of heightened MTR
asym values by 20 days post implantation. In
proliferating cells the dilution of label with cell division led to a reduction
in MTRasym values by 20 days post implantation that remained
elevated compared to non-labeled and rejected cells. Further investigation is
needed to understand the association between MTR
asym values and cell
density.
Conclusion
Imaging
of cell fate decisions using cardioCEST MRI could support the design of novel
methods to improve cell survival and differentiation in cardioregenerative
therapies.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
(1) Ferrauto et al. MRM. 2013; 69(6): 1703-11. (2)
Gilad et al. Nat. Biotech. 2007; 25: 217-19. (3) Pumphrey et al. NMR in
Biomedicine. In Press. 2015. (4) Di Gregorio et al. CMMI. 2013; 8(6): 475-86.
(5) Gao et al. Circ. Res. 2010; 107: 1445-53.