Daniel Arteaga1, Megan Strother1, Taylor Davis1, Carlos Faraco1, Lori Jordan2, Allison Scott1, and Manus Donahue1
1Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Neurology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
Non-invasive, hemodynamic markers are needed to better characterize stroke risk in patients with symptomatic intracranial (IC) stenosis. We developed and applied a planning-free vessel-encoded pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling sequence in IC stenosis patients during room air and hypercapnia to examine the extent of geometrical changes in cerebral blood flow territories. IC stenosis patients demonstrated increased shifting relative to healthy controls; among IC stenosis patients, shifting was higher in those who experienced non-cardioembolic stroke within two-years. Shifting of cerebral blood flow territories may provide a novel marker of hemodynamic impairment and stroke risk. Introduction: The purpose of
this work is to develop and apply a planning-free vessel-encoded
pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (VE-pCASL) approach in healthy
volunteers and patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis to evaluate
geometrical changes in major intracranial cerebral blood flow (CBF) territories
in response to hyperemia elicited by hypercapnic stimuli. A secondary goal is
to evaluate whether subacute hypercapnia-induced flow territory shifting,
hypothesized to be indicative of collateral vessel function or more
controversially intracerebral steal phenomena1-2, may be used to
portend future stroke risk. Specifically, even with aggressive medical
management3-4, patients with intracranial stenosis have a high
12-15% one-year recurrent stroke risk. As such, there is a pressing clinical
need to identify hemodynamic factors that may predict stroke and therefore
provide biomarkers to triage patients for individualized therapies. Previous work
from multiple centers has demonstrated the feasibility of a semi-automated pipeline for
quantifying CBF territory maps using planning-free VE-pCASL5-8, and
we have implemented these methods on clinical scanners as part of a two-year
prospective stroke trial. We hypothesize that VE-pCASL combined with
hypercapnic manipulation of cerebral perfusion pressure may provide a
new indicator of flow territory instability, which could be highest in
parenchyma operating at or near reserve capacity.
Methods: Experiment. All volunteers provided informed, written consent. Healthy
volunteers (n=10; age=33.2±8.0yrs; 5/5
male/female) with no measurable cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, and
patients with intracranial stenosis (n=34; age=60.7±12.4yrs;
16/18 male/female), were scanned at 3T (Philips) using standard structural
imaging, 3D Time of Flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and
VE-pCASL. VE-pCASL
imaging parameters included: spatial resolution=3x3x7mm3; TR/TE=3900ms/13ms;
labeling pulse duration=1650ms; post-labeling delay=1600ms; SENSE factor=2.5;
scan time=4min30s. Separate labeling of the left ICA, right ICA, and vertebral
arteries was performed for each participant, yielding three CBF territories. An
identical scan was repeated during hypercapnia (5% CO2), which
elicited an end-tidal CO2 change of 6.8±1.9 mmHg. Analysis. A
graphical software package was developed (Fig.
1) and applied for data analysis. Mean CBF territories were calculated for
controls and patients separately. Shifting indices were calculated by dividing
the number of voxels displaced between normocapnia and hypercapnia for a single
CBF territory by the total number of voxels in the normocapnia territory. This
value was then multiplied by 100 and averaged across all three CBF territories,
providing a metric of the total change in CBF territory volume for all vessels.
Mann-Whitney U tests and effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were applied. Finally,
patients are in the process of being monitored as part of an ongoing
prospective stroke risk trial. Thirteen of 34 patients returned for follow-up
(duration = 1-2 years), and four of these patients experienced
non-cardioembolic overt or silent (infarct > 3 mm) stroke.
Results and
Discussion:
While the total volume of shifting was small, shifting indices (mean±standard error) increased by 110% for patients (4.13±0.75) relative
to controls (1.96±0.52) (Figs. 2-3); a Mann-Whitney U test
for differences between control and patient shifting indices was significant
(p=0.013) and the effect size was moderate (Cohen’s d=0.72). Of patients with
follow-up imaging, one had occlusion, one was discarded due to motion, and one
had inadequate SNR during the hypercapnia scan. Of the remaining ten patients,
four experienced non-cardioembolic stroke. Subacute (within 30 days of initial stroke
or transient ischemic attack) shifting indices (mean±standard error) were 2.11±0.63
and 1.46±0.25 for patients with and without non-cardioembolic stroke at
two-year follow-up, respectively. The effect size for a difference in shifting
index was moderate (Cohen’s d=0.71). We have applied a planning-free VE-pCASL
approach as part of a clinical trial to investigate how flow territory dynamics
may differ in patients with intracranial vascular disease relative to control
volunteers, and also may be used as a biomarker of future stroke risk. The
planning-free VE-pCASL approach provided meaningful results in 94% of datasets
collected in patients with patent cervical vessels. Flow territory shifting in
response to changes in perfusion pressure secondary to hyperemia and
respiratory-manipulated blood gases was small but highly significant and may
provide an indicator of reserve capacity, or, when combined with
super-selective pCASL9, mechanistic information on controversial
vascular steal phenomena.
Conclusion: We demonstrate
that the shifting of CBF territories between
normocapnia and hypercapnia is slightly but significantly elevated in
symptomatic patients with intracranial stenosis and may provide a new
hemodynamic marker of hemodynamic impairment and stroke risk.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
References: 1. Arteaga DF
et al. JCBFM 2014. 1453-1462. 2. Fierstra et al. JNNP 2010. 81:290-293. 3.
Chimowitz et al. NEJM 2011. 365:993-1003. 4. Zaidat et al. JAMA 2015.
313:1240-1248. 5. Wong EJ et al. MRM 2007. 58:1086-1091. 6. Chappel MA et al.
MRM 2010. 64:1529-1539. 7. Donahue MJ et al. JMRI 2014. 39:377-386. 8. Arteaga
DF et al. OHBM. 2014. 9. Hartkamp et al. MRM 2014.
71:2059-2070.