Bayesian Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging to Map Perfusion in the Human Heart
Georg Spinner1, Constantin von Deuster1,2, Christian Torben Stoeck1, and Sebastian Kozerke1

1Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Synopsis

In vivo cardiac Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging (IVIM) is particularly challenging due to low signal-to-noise ratio, cardiac and respiratory motion. To address the limitation, a spin-echo (SE) based sequence employing motion-compensated diffusion gradients during cardiac contraction was used in combination with Bayesian Shrinkage Prior (BSP) inference. In this work, parameter maps of four volunteers (two slices) are compared to standard segmented least squares (LSQ) regression. Bayesian inferred IVIM parameter maps showed reduced intra-subject variation relative to LSQ. It is concluded that the proposed method is a promising alternative to map myocardial perfusion without the need for contrast agent administration.

Introduction

The concept of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) (1) for perfusion measurement in the heart has gained significant interest in recent years (2), (3). However, low signal-to-noise ratio, partial voluming, cardiac and respiratory motion render IVIM acquisitions and parameter mapping of the heart very challenging. The objective of the present work was to implement cardiac IVIM using a second-order motion compensated diffusion weighted spin-echo approach in conjunction with Bayesian processing to permit perfusion and diffusion parameter mapping of the heart during cardiac contraction.

Methods

A second-order motion compensated diffusion-weighted spin-echo EPI sequence (Figure 1) (4) was implemented on a a 1.5T Philips Achieva system (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) equipped with a 5-channel cardiac receiver coil array and a gradient system delivering 80 mT/m at 100 mT/m/ms. Data from four healthy volunteers (3 female, 1 male, age: 23.5±3.0 years, weight 63.3±8.3 kg, heart rate 69±5 beats/min) were acquired. Two short-axis slices at mid-ventricular and apical level were prescribed and diffusion images were obtained with following parameters: spatial resolution: 2.5×2.5 mm2, slice thickness: 8 mm, reduced field-of-view (FOV): 230×100 mm2, TR/TE: 2R-R/85ms, 7 signal averages, spectral-spatial water-only excitation. Diffusion encoding was performed using 16 optimized b-values (range: 0-880 s/mm2) (5) acquired along three orthogonal diffusion encoding directions during cardiac contraction (50% end systole). Each diffusion direction and b-value was acquired during respiratory navigated breath holding (acceptance window: 5 mm).

In post-processing, affine image registration of diffusion weighted images and averages was performed using elastix (6) to correct for residual respiratory motion induced geometrical inconsistency. In addition, image intensities were corrected to account for variations of the effective repetition time TR as a result of varying heart rate. Thereupon, the signal S(b) was fitted using the IVIM model (Equation 1):

$$S(b)=S_{0} \left[ (1-f) e^{-bD} + f e^{-bD^{*}}\right] \quad (1),$$

with reference intensity S0, diffusion encoding strength b, diffusion coefficient D, perfusion fraction f and pseudo-diffusion coefficient D*. For model fitting, a Bayesian shrinkage prior (BSP) inference approach (7) was implemented to estimate the parameters of the IVIM model. The shrinkage prior was a multivariate Gaussian distribution of the log-transformed parameters with a Jeffrey's hyper-prior (8) on the parameter region-of-interest (ROI) mean μ and covariance matrix Σμ:

$$p \left( \mu, \Sigma_{\mu} \right) = |\Sigma_{\mu}|^{-1/2} \quad (2)$$

The Markov Chain Monte Carlo implementation of Equation 2 used 2·104 samples for a burn-in phase and 104 for the actual sampling. For comparison, a standard segmented least squares (LSQ) fit (9) was used. Both the LSQ and the BSP method were implemented in Matlab (The Mathworks, Natick, MA) as part of the overall processing chain. In data analysis, the variance of D, f and D* across the myocardium and slices was compared for BSP vs. LSQ in each subject according to the AHA segmentation scheme (10). Mean values and ranges are reported for the study population.

Results

Systolic IVIM data were successfully acquired in all subjects (Figure 2). BSP processing (Table 1) resulted in reduced fluctuation of D and f maps across the myocardium when compared to the LSQ results (Figure 3). The intra-slice variation of D, f and D* was 0.02·10-3 mm2/s, 0.026, 3.19·10-2 mm2/s for BSP versus 0.03·10-3 mm2/s, 0.041, 2.32·10-2 mm2/s for LSQ (Figure 4). Mean values per sector and slice across the myocardium were comparable (1.33·10-3 mm2/s, 0.095, 5.99·10-2 mm2/s (BSP) vs. 1.27·10-3 mm2/s, 0.114, 4.18·10-2 mm2/s (LSQ)). Comparing mean values of the mid-ventricular and apical slices a difference of 0.01·10-3 mm2/s, 0.018, 1.19·10-2 mm2/s for D, f, and D* was found across volunteers. The overall mean and standard deviation of the perfusion fraction across all volunteers was 0.104±0.064 and 0.086±0.049 for the mid-ventricular and apical slice, respectively.

Discussion

Second-order motion compensated diffusion-weighted imaging in combination with Bayesian shrinkage prior inference allows to map the perfusion fraction of the human heart during systolic contraction. Imaging in systole reduces partial volume effects due to a more favorable ratio of voxel size to myocardial thickness when compared to imaging in diastole. In addition, systolic time points are more reproducible in the presence of heart rate variations thereby improving the consistency of the data. In combination with Bayesian processing perfusion maps with reduced noise are obtained when compared to standard segmented least squares fitting.

Conclusion

Bayesian Intravoxel Incoherent Motion mapping is considered a promising approach to map myocardial perfusion fractions without the need for contrast agent administration. Further work is warranted to study local perfusion changes during both rest and pharmacologically induced stress in ischemic patients.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by VPH-DARE@IT and UK EPSRC (EP/I018700/1).

References

1. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988;168:497–505. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671.

2. Moulin K, Croisille P, Feiweier T, Delattre BM a, Wei H, Robert B, Beuf O, Viallon M. In-vivo free-breathing DTI & IVIM of the whole human heart using a real-time slice-followed SE-EPI navigator-based sequence: a reproducibility study in healthy volunteers. 23rd Annu. Meet. ISMRM 2015;3:5220.

3. Delattre BM a, Viallon M, Wei H, Zhu YM, Feiweier T, Pai VM, Wen H, Croisille P. In vivo cardiac diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: quantification of normal perfusion and diffusion coefficients with intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Invest. Radiol. 2012;47:662–70. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31826ef901.

4. Stoeck CT, von Deuster C, Genet M, Atkinson D, Kozerke S. Second-order motion-compensated spin echo diffusion tensor imaging of the human heart. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015: doi: 10.1002/mrm.25784.

5. Lemke A, Stieltjes B, Schad LR, Laun FB. Toward an optimal distribution of b values for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;29:766–76. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.03.004.

6. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever M a., Pluim JPW. Elastix: A toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2010;29:196–205. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616.

7. Orton MR, Collins DJ, Koh D-M, Leach MO. Improved intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of diffusion weighted imaging by data driven Bayesian modeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014;71:411–20. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24649.

8. Jeffreys H. An Invariant Form for the Prior Probability in Estimation Problems. Proc. R. Soc. London A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 1946;186:453–461.

9. Notohamiprodjo M, Chandarana H, Mikheev A, Rusinek H, Grinstead J, Feiweier T, Raya JG, Lee VS, Sigmund EE. Combined intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion tensor imaging of renal diffusion and flow anisotropy. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014;00:1–7. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25245.

10. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger J a., Ryan TJ, Verani MS. Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2002;4:203–210. doi: 10.1081/JCMR-120003946.

Figures

Figure 1: Second order motion compensated diffusion weighted imaging sequence. Dashed lines indicate the variation of gradients to achieve different diffusion encoding strengths (b-values) whilst keeping the duration of the gradients constant.

Figure 2: Example trace images obtained for an apical and mid-ventricular slice for all recorded b-values (0-880 s/mm2).

Figure 3: Example IVIM parameter maps comparing least squares (LSQ) and Bayesian shrinkage prior (BSP) based results.

Figure 4: Boxplots of IVIM parameters for least squares (LSQ) and Bayesian shrinkage prior (BSP) based inference fitting in a single subject.

Table 1: Mean IVIM parameters for all volunteers and slices after TR correction and using Bayesian shrinkage prior (BSP) inference.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0998