Mark Valasek1, Qun He2,3, Claude Sirlin2, Graeme M. Bydder2, and Nikolaus M. Szeverenyi2
1Pathology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 2Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 3Ningbo Jansen NMR Technology Co., Ltd., Cixi, Zhejiang, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
We performed MR microscopy at 11.7 T to examine the tissue
structure of normal, fibrotic and cirrhotic liver samples. Images having
100-1,000 times the spatial resolution of clinical MR images were obtained in small
tissue samples using an animal imaging system with appropriately small custom T/R
solenoid coils. Diffusion imaging with three direction of sensitization revealed
sheet like fibrous structures, exhibiting high signal intensity in regions
where the sensitization direction was orthogonal to a sheet.Introduction
MR
microscopy of tissues provides a valuable intermediate stage between histology
and clinical MRI. Providing 100-1,000
times the spatial resolution of clinical MRI, it facilitates the correlation of
MR images with histology. Since MR microscopy has the same contrast properties
as clinical imaging, it provides a research tool to better understand the
microstructural underpinnings of these properties. This understanding can
improve radiologists ability to interpret MR images and guide the development
of new MR sequences . In this study we
illustrate the use of MR microscopy in liver fibrosis and cirrhosis to improve
understanding of MR images, reveal previously MR invisible normal parenchymal
microstructure and pathological alterations, and question some prevailing
paradigms.
Material and Methods
Nine formalin
fixed human hepatic specimens (4 normal, 1 stage 2 fibrosis, 1 stage 3
fibrosis, 1 alcoholic cirrhosis, 2 HCV cirrhosis) and two fresh pig liver
specimens were examined at 11.7T using a Buker BioSpec 117/16USR animal scanner with a
small custom T/R solenoid coil (6 mm diameter). Spin echo (SE), Gradient echo (GRE), Diffusion
weighted (DW) images were acquired with the following parameters:
2D SE: TR=3000
TE=8-16ms 40µmx40µmx500µm voxels. 3D GRE: TR=80 FA=15
TE= 312ms 40µmx40µmx500µm voxels.
2D DW SE:
TR=2000 TE=16-24ms 100µmx100µmx500µm voxels b=1000-1500 s/mm2
Scan
times of 4 to 6 hours. After imaging,
specimens were submitted for histology. MR images were analyzed qualitatively,
using histology to confirm the observed microstructure.
Results
Normal
features
The normal
hepatic lobule, which is invisible with conventional MRI, was well seen in human
tissue MR on both SE and GRE images. The margins of the lobules were of low signal
on T2 and T2* weighted images; a signal intensity gradient
was observed increasing from the periphery towards the center of the lobule
(Fig. 1). Portal venules were seen in the portal triads and hepatic venules
were seen centrally. Clotted blood had a high signal intensity on T1
and T2 weighted images. Liquid blood had a high signal on heavily T2
weighted images. Susceptibility effects
with changes in signal and intensity and phase were seen with gradient echo
images of the portal veins. Susceptibility differences were seen in lobules.
Abnormal
Findings
Fibrosis
alone produced a shortening of T1 and an increase in T2
and T2*. It was concentrated around the portal tracts (Fig. 2). In cirrhosis
there was more obvious fibrosis with thickened sheets and irregular nodule
formation (Fig. 3). The diffusion weighted images (Fig. 4) showed evidence of anisotropic
diffusion, with high signal observed when the diffusion gradient is perpendicular
to the plane of fibrosis.
Conclusion
MR
microscopy permitted the first ever visualization of the normal human hepatic
lobule, providing an anatomic frame of reference for recognizing normal and
abnormal features within the liver. The detailed differences within hepatic
lobules and the portal tracts have not previously been recognized with MRI in
animal or human tissue, nor has the anisotropic nature of fibrosis either in
pre-cirrhotic or cirrhotic liver (2,3). The susceptibility changes may reflect
normal tissue and abnormal fibrosis as well as effects due to the presence of parenmchymal
iron and/or blood products. MR microscopy has the potential to advance our
understanding of the MR appearance of the liver and to challenge current
paradigms. Ultimately, this information may improve the interpretation of
clinical MR images as well as guide the development of MR techniques sensitive
to clinically relevant microstructural alterations.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Delnomdedieu
M et. al. Magnetic resonance microscopy and histopathology: comparative approach
of bromobenzene-induced hepatotoxicity in the rat.
Hepatology
1998:27:526-32.
2.Lewis S. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am
2014: 22:373-395.
3.Van Beers
BE et al New imaging techniques for liver diseases.
J
Hepatol 2015 :62: 690-70.