Julie A Bauml1, Mark L Schiebler1, Christopher J Francois1, Kevin M Johnson2, and Scott K Nagle1,2,3
1Radiology, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 3Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States
Synopsis
MR imaging of the chest is challenging due to the low proton
density, the short T2* of the lungs and cardiorespiratory motion. Many patients
suspected of pulmonary embolism are short of breath, which can limit the
utility of breath-held techniques. Free-breathing ultrashort echo time (UTE)
approaches (TE < 0.10 ms) help to overcome some of these difficulties. In
this prospective pilot clinical study, we demonstrate that UTE provides better
overall depiction of chest structures when compared to MRA. We conclude that
UTE is complementary to MRA of the chest in the analysis of both vascular and
non-vascular thoracic structures.Purpose
We sought to assess the performance of post contrast ultra-short
echo time (UTE) MR compared with contrast enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance
angiography (MRA) for depiction of the
vasculature and other anatomic structures in the chest.
Methods
This pilot study was
IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant. Twelve patients were prospectively recruited
to undergo an additional post contrast free-breathing 3D radial UTE acquisition
performed immediately after an MRA performed for clinical reasons. Eleven
subjects received 0.03 mmol/kg gadofosveset trisodium (Ablavar). One subject
received 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance). Nine exams were
performed at 1.5 T (MR 450w, GE Healthcare), and three were performed at 3.0 T (MR
750w, GE Healthcare).
Breath-held MRA was performed
using a previously published, commercially available method1,2.
Scan time for the UTE acquisition was approximately 5 minutes, during which
patients were instructed to breathe normally. UTE imaging parameters included: slab selection, variable
density readout3, retrospective respiratory gating
with a 40% acceptance window using respiratory bellows, flip angle=8°,
resolution=1.25mm isotropic, TE=0.08 ms, TR=2.8 ms at 1.5T and 3.9 ms at 3T.
Images were evaluated on 16 clinically relevant anatomic
features (6 vascular, 10 non-vascular) in the chest. To create a composite score, each feature was
assigned a weighting factor based upon our perception of the feature’s
importance for clinical diagnosis when imaging a patient with symptoms
suspicious for pulmonary embolism (Figure 1). Two cardiothoracic radiologists then scored each
MRA and UTE exam in an independent, blinded fashion in randomized order. The
readers rated each feature on a 4-point ordinal scale: 0=Poor, 1=Fair, 2=Good,
3=Excellent. We calculated total scores (0-96) and pulmonary artery subscores
(0-24) by a weighted sum of the feature scores. We
assessed the inter-observer variability of the total scores using the intra-class
correlation coefficient (ICC). We performed paired 2-tailed t-tests to compare
UTE and MRA total scores and pulmonary artery subscores, using the average of
the 2 readers’ scores for each acquisition.
Results
The inter-observer ICC was 0.58 for MRA (moderate agreement)
and 0.78 for UTE (strong agreement). Total scores were significantly better for
UTE (74.4) than for MRA (62.9) with a p-value of 0.018 (Figure 2A). Pulmonary
artery sub-scores for UTE (17.8) did not significantly differ from MRA (17.9)
with p=0.94 (Figure 2B). Figures 3 and 4 show examples in which UTE allowed
identification of clinically important findings not visible on the MRA exams
Discussion
Overall, UTE outperformed MRA for depiction of chest
structures. There were several examples of specific pathology (bone and
mediastinal lymphadenopathy) seen on the UTE examinations that were not detected
by the same readers on the MRA exams. However, there were also several examples
of MRA outperforming UTE for the aorta and pulmonary arteries due to the breath
hold nature of that acquisition (Figure 2). A limitation of this study was the
absence of pulmonary emboli in any of the subjects. However, a prior animal
study showed excellent efficacy of UTE relative to MRA in the detection of
pulmonary embolism
4. These results support a larger prospective
clinical study of UTE in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism, focusing not
only on diagnostic efficacy for detecting pulmonary embolism but also on the
ability of UTE to depict alternative diagnoses that may be the cause of the
patient’s symptoms.
Conclusion
UTE imaging is complementary to conventional MRA imaging of
the chest and is superior to MRA in depicting non-vascular structures in
clinical patients. The addition of a UTE scan following MRA may be of particular
value in patients who have difficulty breath-holding or in whom pulmonary
embolism is only one of several possible diagnostic concerns.
Disclosures
Contrast enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography
is an off label use of gadolinium based contrast agents.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Wendy Trotter for her enthusiasm in recruiting subjects and GE Healthcare for research support of our department. References
1. François
CJ, et al. JMRI 2013; 37:1290–1300.
2. Schiebler ML, et al. JMRI
2013, 38: 914-925.
3. Johnson
KM, et al. MRM 2013; 70: 1241–1250.
4. Bannas
P, et al. Radiology 2015 Ahead of
print, 10.1148/radiol.2015150606