Simon Gross1, Yolanda Duerst1, Laetitia Maƫlle Vionnet1, Christoph Barmet1,2, and Klaas Paul Pruessmann1
1Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2Skope Magnetic Resonance Inc., Zurich, Switzerland
Synopsis
A novel model for the prediction of B0-maps from external field measurements is presented. It is based on the joint analysis of training data from simultaneously
acquired B0-maps and magnetic field evolution measured with NMR field probes. A first application to real-time shim feedback is demonstrated. Introduction
In MRI, sequences with long echo times are prone to
image artifacts due to magnetic field inhomogeneities. Commonly, static inhomogeneities are removed by the application of countering shim fields or accounted for at the reconstruction stage. However, typically these strategies target only static inhomogeneity. Although mostly much weaker in
amplitude, dynamic changes of the B0 field caused, e.g., by respiration or
magnet drift, can introduce inconsistencies in acquired data and lead to image
artifacts1. A number of methods, including
corrections based on navigators2 or respiratory belts3 as well as feedback field control4 have been introduced to counter such problems.
In this work we
present a novel method for modeling spatiotemporal B0 evolutions in a target
volume, guided by external field probes. An underlying B0 atlas is created by training with time-resolved B0 maps
and concurrent field probe readouts. During actual imaging the atlas is then used to infer current B0 maps based on probe information only. The reliability of this approach is demonstrated by validation
experiments. As a first application we demonstrate atlas-based real-time field control.
Method
Atlas Generation: Generation and application of the atlas are summarized in figure 1. First, a
series of (fast) phase images is acquired. After subtraction of a reference
image, the series reflects the spatiotemporal evolution of B0 in every pixel. The
field evolution is also reflected in the probe data p, measured concurrently with image acquisition. A principal
component analysis of the probe data extracts the spatial characteristics of this
field evolution. A lower-dimensional representation of the spatiotemporal
B0-manifold is found by identifying spatial basis functions, evolving with the
same temporal-evolution (w) as the
principal components (PC) of the probe data. Doing so, each PC is paired with a
corresponding B0-pattern, all significant B0-patterns forming a basis set Y.
For the
application of the atlas, the measured probe values p’ are transformed into the PC-basis. This operation yields the
coefficients used to construct the B0-estimate from Y.
Atlases can be
constructed for the entire imaging volume or for a sub-volume of interest.
Data Acquisition
: For the
atlas calibration we used low-resolution, single-shot EPI’s (2x2x2.5mm
EPI, SENSE 3, TE 11.9ms, slice TR 56ms). Such images can be shot at high
repetition times, capturing the entire manifold of breathing fields within a
few respiration cycles. The magnetic field evolution was recorded concurrently with
a 19F NMR field probe setup5 .
Application to Real
Time Shim Feedback:
Real-time spatiotemporal field stabilization
with shim feedback4 allows
to correct for dynamic field changes. A PI-controller dynamically actuates the
shim-system during the image acquisition. It minimizes the difference between a
constant target value and continuously measured field probe values. This way,
the field distribution in the enclosed volume is stabilized over time. However,
especially in the lower brain regions, respiratory field-disturbances are often
of high spatial order and are counteracted only insufficiently. The
introduction of an atlas-based shim-feedback can partly resolve this limitation.
Based on a local model, it allows the feedback to be optimal for a specific
target region, resulting in a more accurate compensation of local fluctuations
as compared to whole volume stabilization.
All experiments were performed at 7T (Philips Achieva).
Results
Atlas-Validation:
Data sets consisting of a phase image time series
(same as above) paired with concurrent field measurements were acquired for
validation. The field evolution predicted by the atlas was compared to the
actually measured field evolution. Figure 2A shows the situation for a ROI
selected in the primary visual cortex. The atlas-based prediction can reproduce
the field distribution in the ROI with a precision below 1Hz (0.4Hz average
over total scan duration). The situation is more accentuated in lower regions,
as shown in figure 2B.
Shim Feedback: Atlas-based shim-feedback
was applied to T2*-weigthed imaging of the brainstem (0.3x0.3x1.3mm, TE 25 ms,
TR 700ms). Figure 3 shows the image obtained with atlas-feedback, in comparison
with standard spherical harmonics feedback and without any correction. The
advantage of the atlas-based correction can be appreciated especially in the
lower region.
Discussion
The presented B0-atlas
method has been shown to provide
reliable predictions of the spatiotemporal
field evolution in a region of interest. Further optimization
of the field probe positions could
allow
the method to even better differentiate spatial characteristics of disturbing fields, potentially
increasing the accuracy
of B0 prediction. The approach has likely much to gain also from higher-level models that may be inspired by manifold learning, a rapidly growing area in computer science. Besides
the shown application in real-time field control, the method holds promise also for image reconstruction based on dynamic B0 information.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1 Versluis MJ, Peeters JM, van Rooden S, van der Grond J, van Buchem MA,
Webb AG, van Osch MJ. Neuroimage. 2010, 51:1082-3
2 Pfeuffer J, Van de Moortele PF,
Ugurbil K, Hu X, Glover GH. Magn Reson
Med 2002, 47:344–353
3 P.
van Gelderen P, de Zwart JA, Starewicz P, Hinks R.S. and Duyn J.H. Magn Reson Med, 2007, 57:362-8
4 Duerst
Y, Wilm BJ, Dietrich BE, Vannesjo SJ, Barmet B, Schmid T, Brunner DO and
Pruesmann KP. Magn Reson Med, 2014, 73:884-893
5 Dietrich B E, Brunner D O, Wilm B J, Barmet C, Gross
S, Kasper L, Haeberlin M, Schmid T, Vannesjo, S J, Pruessmann K P. Magn Reson Med. 2015