Wieke Haakma1,2,3, Lidy Kuster2, Martijn Froeling1, Lars Uhrenholt2, Michael Pedersen3,4, Jeroen Hendrikse1, Alexander Leemans5, and Lene Warner Thorup Boel2
1Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, 3Comparative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, 4MR Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, 5Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
In this work we examined the architecture and
diffusion measures of the cervical spine and nerves in non-fixated post-mortem
subjects. We were able to display the architectural configuration of the
cervical nerves at the level of C4-C8 and we computed reference values for the
diffusion measures in these nerves. We showed with great detail the ventral and
dorsal nerve roots with fiber tractography. Microscopic examination revealed
normal anatomy. We expect that post-mortem diffusion
MRI will be valuable for understanding of pathological mechanisms underlying
degenerative neurological diseases, as it is possible to compare any findings
directly to histological examinations. Purpose
The exact pathological mechanisms behind degenerative
nerve diseases affecting spinal and peripheral nervous tissue are still largely
unknown. The examination of spine and nervous tissue in the cervical area can
be tedious. Therefore, a method is needed that is able to examine peripheral
nervous tissue in an efficient way. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), allowing for
the evaluation of microstructural properties of nervous structures, is an excellent
candidate. In this context, DTI has already been used to investigate the lumbar
nerve roots1, and the cervical nerves in vivo2,3. To what
extent DTI is able to identify the cervical myelum and nerve roots in great detail
remains to be shown. Validation with histology is needed to assess the added value
of DTI for investigating peripheral nervous tissue. The aim of this work is to
examine the architectural configuration and the microstructural substrate of
the cervical spine and its nerve roots with post-mortem (PM) DTI and histological
dissection in non-fixated subjects.
Methods
Five non-fixated PM subjects with normal anatomy of
the cervical spine were included; 5 men (4-6 days after death) with a mean age
of 51 years (range 25–90 years). Subjects were scanned at the level of the C3-C8
on a 1.5 Tesla MR system (Achieva; Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands)
using a head-neck 32-channel phased-array surface coil. Two DTI protocols
were obtained with diffusion-weighted spin echo single-shot EPI sequence, i.e., (1) an “isotropic” protocol to investigate the nerves (C4-C8) and
(2) a “high in-plane resolution” protocol to investigate the myelum and ventral
and dorsal nerve roots (C5-C7). Both were repeated two times in the same scan
session. As an anatomical reference, a multi-echo fast field echo (mFFE) sequence was acquired at the level of C5-C7. An overview of the parameters of the scan
sequences is displayed in Table 1. Tissue samples of the myelum and peripheral
nerve roots at the level of C5-C7 were obtained during the autopsy on the next
day. Processing of the diffusion MRI data was performed with
ExploreDTI4 and comprised the
following steps. First, the diffusion MRI data
were corrected for eddy current distortions, and EPI deformations
5,6.
Second, diffusion tensors were fitted using the iteratively weighted linear
regression procedure
7. Finally, DTI
based fiber tractography (FT) was performed with a fractional anisotropy (FA)
threshold of 0.15-0.9, minimum fiber length of 10 mm, and an angle of 30°. Estimates for
the FA, mean (MD), axial (AD), and radial (RD) diffusivity of the cervical
nerves (C4-C8) were computed.
Results
With FT
performed on DTI data obtained with the “isotropic” protocol it was possible to
reconstruct the 3D architecture of the myelum, cervical nerves, and nerve roots
in all 5 PM subjects (Fig. 1). We were able to show the dorsal and ventral
nerve roots with great detail with the “high in-plane resolution” protocol
(Fig. 2 and Fig. 3) and we identified a low FA in the grey matter and a high FA in the
white matter. Histology revealed normal anatomy of the myelum
and peripheral nerves in all 5 cases, which was in accordance with the architectural
configuration found with FT. Reference values for the DTI measures are shown in
Table 2. MD values were approximately 5 times lower than in vivo results,
whereas FA values were comparable with previous in vivo studies of the cervical nerves
1,2.
Discussion
The observed differences in MD, AD, and RD between the
PM and in vivo results are expected to be mainly caused by temperature
differences of the tissue
8. Diffusion values were comparable to
those obtained in an earlier PM study investigating the lumbosacral nerves
9.
With the “high in-plane resolution protocol” we were able to show with great
detail the dorsal and ventral nerve roots with FT. This information is relevant,
since it provides insight to what extent these nerve bundles can be visualized
with FT PM, and it can be used as an example for future in vivo studies. The proposed DTI method may
contribute to better understanding of nervous and muscular diseases, where only
the motor or the sensor neurons are affected, as these findings can directly be
compared to histological examinations.
Conclusion
This PM DTI and FT study shows that the cervical
spine and nerves can be identified with great detail. Histological examination identified
normal anatomy of the myelum and peripheral nerves, which was in accordance
with the architectural configuration found with FT. We were able to quantify
the diffusion properties of these nerves PM and we showed the dorsal and ventral
nerve roots with great detail.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by
the KNAW Van Leersum fund.References
[1] Karampinos DC, Melkus G, Shepherd
TM, et al. Diffusion
tensor imaging and T2 relaxometry of bilateral lumbar nerve roots: feasibility
of in-plane imaging NMR Biomed. 2013;26(6):630–7
[2] Vargas MI, Viallon M, Nguyen D, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging
(DTI) and tractography of the brachial plexus: feasibility and initial
experience in neoplastic conditions. Neuroradiology. 2010;52(3):237-45
[3] Tagliafico A, Calabrese M, Puntoni M, et al. Brachial plexus MR
imaging: accuracy and reproducibility of DTI-derived measurements and fibre
tractography at 3.0-T. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(8):1764-71
[4] Leemans A, Jeurissen B, Sijbers J, et al. ExploreDTI: a
graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data.
Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2009;17:3536.
[5] Leemans A, Jones DK. The B-matrix
must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magn Reson Med.
2009;61(6):1336–49
[6] Irfanoglu MO, Walker L, Sarlls J,
et al. Effects of image distortions originating from susceptibility variations
and concomitant fields on diffusion MRI tractography results. Neuroimage. 2012;61(1):275-88
[7] Veraart J, Sijbers J, Sunaert S, et al. Weighted linear least squares
estimation of diffusion MRI parameters: Strengths, limitations, and pitfalls. NeuroImage.
2013;1(81):335-46
[8] D'Arceuil HE, Westmoreland S, de Crespigny AJ. An approach to high
resolution diffusion tensor imaging in fixed primate brain. Neuroimage 2007;35(2):553–565.
[9] Haakma W, Pedersen M, Froeling M, et al. ISMRM 2015, 3015
[10] © 2004 Benjamin Cummings