David C. Gross1,2, Benjamin Scandling1, and Orlando P. Simonetti3,4
1Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 2Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States, 3Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States, 4Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
Synopsis
The goal of this study was to investigate the
influence of blood flow on the temperature rise of a peripheral vascular stent
during MRI with flow phantom experiments and computer simulations. RF heating
experiments of a vascular stent are performed during MRI at 3.0T in a flow
phantom. The temperature rise of the stent is measured with varied flow
rates. The temperature rise of the stent was over 10°C without flow, and
was reduced by 50% with a flow rate of only 50 mL/min. Blood flow
significantly reduces the temperature rise of stents and the surrounding tissue
during RF heating. Introduction
Magnetic Resonance (MR)
safety evaluations provide important information to patients and physicians
regarding the potential hazards of implanted medical devices in the MR
environment. Radio Frequency (RF) induced heating is one of the important safety
concerns and is evaluated using a standard test method, ASTM F2182.
1 This test
method, however, does not account for physiological cooling mechanisms such as
blood flow, and as a result may produce overly conservative temperature
measurements. These conservative test results are reported in the
labeling of medical devices and can ultimately cause patients to be
unnecessarily excluded from MRI procedures.
Therefore, we hypothesize that a superior approach to MR safety
evaluation of medical devices is to accurately simulate in vivo conditions.
In order to test our hypothesis we developed a finite element simulation
of RF induced heating with computational fluid dynamics, and compared the
simulation results to experimental measurements a standard test phantom that was retrofit with a flow
channel.
Methods
The RF induced heating
experiments were conducted using a 3.0 T Siemens Tim Trio MR system operating
at a frequency of approximately 128 MHz.
The RF body coil transmitter and a turbo spin echo sequence were used with
a flip angle of 130°, TR/TE = 269/11 ms, TA = 450 s and a console reported
Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of approximately 5.5 W/kg achieved by overriding
the system SAR monitor. The phantom was
filled with a gelled saline prepared according to the ASTM F2182 standard with
25 L of distilled water mixed with 1.32 g/L NaCl and 10 g/L polyacrylic acid
(PAA). The electrical conductivity of
the gel at room temperature was 0.47 ± 10% S/m.
The electrical and thermal properties of the gel mimic average human
tissue but the viscosity of the gel prevents convective heat transport. The phantom was retrofit with a flow channel
using silicone tubing with an inner and outer diameter of 7.9 mm and 11 mm,
respectively. A nitinol stent, 10 mm x
80 mm (diameter x length), was positioned on the exterior of a thin-walled
silicone tube (less than 1 mm wall thickness) with an outer diameter of 10 mm
and connected in-line with the silicone tubing. Silicone tubing was routed from the MR
equipment room through an RF waveguide and connected to the inlet and outlet of
the phantom flow channel. A peristaltic
pump was used to circulate room-temperature water from a reservoir through the
silicone tubing at controlled flow rates.
Temperature measurements were recorded using a fiber optic probe system
(Luxtron FOT Lab Kit) with four STF type probes that take measurements at a
frequency of 1 Hz with an accuracy of ± 0.2°C within 20°C of the calibration
temperature (37°C). A temperature probe
was placed at the proximal and distal end of the stent, between the stent and
the thin-walled silicone tubing. The
remaining probes were located on the opposite side of the phantom and in the
water reservoir. The phantom was filled
with gel to a depth of 9 cm and positioned on the patient table of the MR
system without the spine coil and landmarked along the mid-length of the stent
and phantom. COMSOL Multiphysics was
used to solve the sequentially coupled electromagnetics, fluid dynamics and
transient heat transfer of the RF induced heating of the stent with varied
volumetric flow rates.
Results and Discussion
A summary of the
experimental measurements and simulation results are shown in Figure 1. The experiment and simulation of the average
maximum temperature rise of the stent with respect to the volumetric flow rate
of the fluid are in good agreement. The
temperature rise of the stent was over 10°C without flow, and was reduced by
50% with a flow rate of only 50 mL/min.
The vascular stent used in this study is indicated for the iliac
arteries, which have volumetric flow rates of up to 450 mL/min. The simulation of a volumetric flow rate of
450 mL/min resulted in a 4.0°C temperature rise of the stent, which is a 60%
decrease in the temperature rise compared to the zero flow case. A previous study has also demonstrated the
thermal significance of flow for RF induced heating of a coronary stent.
2Conclusion
The computer simulation
enables accurate calculations of the influence of blood flow on the RF induced
temperature rise of a vascular stent during MRI. Blood flow has a significant impact on the
thermal response of tissue and stents during RF induced heating.
Acknowledgements
DG gratefully acknowledges support from the American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship (15PRE25700008). The authors gratefully acknowledge support from MED Institute, Inc.References
[1] ASTM Standard F2182-11a, “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Radio Frequency Induced Heating On or Near Passive Implants During
Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. 2011.
[2] Nyenhuis J, Elder N, Hossainy S. Reduction due to blood flow of stent heating induced by the RF Magnetic Field during MRI. BMES/FDA Frontiers in Medical Devices Conference. College Park, MD. 2015.