Sarah Calvert1, Steven Reynolds2, Martyn Paley2, and Allan Pacey1
1Department of Oncology & Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 2Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Sperm movement
is necessary for reproduction and low sperm motility can impede fertilization.
There is a need for greater understanding of the metabolic processes that drive
sperm motility. In this study, we examined differences in sperm metabolite
profiles between high and low quality sperm in order to identify possible intracellular
biomarkers of sperm quality and motility. Sperm motility was significantly
different between the two fractions and fell either side of the WHO lower
reference limit. Low quality sperm contained higher concentrations of choline,
methyls, citrate and lactate, indicative of increased cell membrane and altered
metabolism towards glycolysis.Introduction
Sperm movement
is necessary for reproduction and high sperm motility is associated with increased
fertilization rates (1,2). Asthenozoospermia (low sperm
motility) can impede fertilization and affects ~81% of men attending for
diagnostic semen analysis (3). Current therapeutic options
for asthenozoospermia are limited, with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
being the main treatment option. However, only 21.1% of ICSI treatments across
Europe result in a live birth and it is, on average, more expensive than
conventional IVF (4). During assisted conception
sperm are often washed using silica bead density gradient centrifugation to
select those of higher quality with increased motility, and lower quality
sperm are discarded (5). A greater understanding of
the metabolic processes that underpin sperm quality and motility could lead to novel
therapeutic options for asthenozoospermia. In this study, we examined
differences in metabolite profiles between sperm of high and low quality, obtained
from different fractions of the density centrifugation sperm washing, in order
to identify possible intracellular biomarkers of sperm quality.
Methods
Normozoospermic ejaculates from 7
research donors (recruited with LREC approval) were collected and analyzed for
sperm count and progressive motility. Samples were washed using 40:80% (v/v)
Percoll-PBS gradient and sperm from both the 80% pellet (higher quality) and
the 40:80% interface (lower quality) were collected. Leukocyte depletion was
performed on both sperm populations by magnetic separation after incubation
with Dynabeads CD45 (Invitrogen). Samples were examined at 37°C on a 9.4T MR
spectrometer to acquire spectra using a {
1H} water-gate solvent
suppression sequence (SW=20ppm, NS=1024, AQ=0.5s, D1=4). Each spectrum was
phase and baseline corrected. Metabolite peaks were identified in the
1H
spectrum and integrated: they are presented per million sperm. Additionally,
the mean integral from two empty regions of the spectrum (10-11 ppm and -1-0
ppm) was subtracted from each individual metabolite integral to remove any
additional baseline bias. All integrals were normalised with the maximum
integral set as 100. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was performed and
(P<0.05) taken as significant. In a subset of four samples, time dependent
changes were monitored by acquiring sequential
1H spectra
(acquisition parameters as above) over a period of ~20 hours. These time course
spectra were integrated in bins of 0.05ppm between 0 and 10 ppm. Each bin for
the time course was fitted to a linear regression model to determine relative
rates of change within the spectrum. All data reported as mean ±SE (n=7), unless
otherwise stated.
Results
Higher
quality sperm recovered from the 80% pellet had higher progressive motility
compared to lower quality sperm from the 40:80% interface (44.5% ±5.5 vs. 31.0%
±3.7, P<0.05). Comparing the metabolite integrals for the samples showed
that low quality sperm had significantly higher concentrations of choline (56.6
± 8.8 vs. 26.0 ± 3.6), methyls (22.7 ±6.2 vs. 5.6 ±1.1), citrate (16.4 ±5.3 vs.
3.7 ±1.0), lactate (6.7 ±1.8 vs. 2.1 ±0.7) and aromatics (16.27 ±8.2 vs. 2.0 ±0.9)
compared to high quality sperm (P<0.05) (figures 1-3). Acetyl-carnitine
integrals were not significantly different (7.1 ±2.2 vs. 3.2 ±0.8). Minimal
changes were observed for most of the integral bins in the time course spectra,
with exception those containing choline, acetate and methyl integrals which
increased in concentration after ~5hrs (n=5).
Discussion
Sperm
motility was significantly different between the two fractions and fell either
side of the WHO lower reference limit (32% progressively motile sperm) (6). However, motile sperm were
still found in the low quality fraction. This may be due to other factors
pertinent to sperm density, such as sperm morphology and DNA anomalies, having
a large influence on sperm gradient separation (7,8).
Metabolites were
at higher concentrations in low quality sperm. There
were significant differences between high and low quality sperm integrals for choline
and methyls, both of
which are incorporated into the cell membrane. These differences indicate low
quality sperm have altered sperm morphology and/or increased cytoplasmic
vacuoles. Though it is unclear why citrate, the first product of the TCA cycle,
was increased in low quality sperm it may indicate decreased oxidative
phosphorylation, leading to accumulation of TCA cycle products. Also, lactate
was at higher concentrations in lower quality sperm and may indicate increased
glycolysis, perhaps to compensate for a lack of oxidative phosphorylation. The
metabolite changes observed over time suggest that sperm may undergo apoptosis
after 5 hours under these conditions.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Sarah Waite for her support with participant recruitment. This project was funded by the MRC.References
1. Guzick
DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil CK, Nakajima ST, Coutifaris C, et
al. Sperm Morphology, Motility, and Concentration in Fertile and Infertile Men.
N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1388–93.
2. Holt C,
Holt W V., Moore HDM, Reed HCB, Curnock RM. Objectively measured boar sperm
motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations:
results of two fertility trials. J Androl. 1997;18(3):312–23.
3. Curi SM,
Ariagno JI, Chenlo PH, Mendeluk GR, Pugliese MN, Sardi Segovia LM, et al.
Asthenozoospermia: analysis of a large population. Arch Androl J Reprod Syst.
Informa UK Ltd UK; 2003;49(5):343–9.
4. Kupka MS,
Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J, Erb K, D’Hooghe T, Castilla JA, et al. Assisted
reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European
registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(10):2099–113.
5. Henkel
RR, Schill W-B. Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biol Endocrinol.
2003;1(1):108.
6. World
Health Organisation. WHO laboratory manual for the Examination and processing
of human semen. Fifth Edit. WHO Press, World Health Organization: Geneva; 2010.
7. Le Lannou
D, Blanchard Y. Nuclear maturity and morphology of human spermatozoa selected
by Percoll density gradient centrifugation or swim-up procedure. Reproduction.
1988;84(2):551–6.
8. Sakkas D,
Manicardi GC, Tomlinson M, Mandrioli M, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, et al. The use
of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to
separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies. Hum Reprod.
2000;15(5):1112–6.