Impact of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Fusion Phenotype and Valve Stenosis on Aortic 3D Hemodynamics: New Insights from a Large Cohort 4D Flow MRI Study in 312 subjects
Alex J Barker1, Pim van Ooij2, Emilie Bollache1, David Guzzardi3, S. Chris Malaisrie4, Patrick M McCarthy4, Jeremy D Collins1, James Carr1, Paul WM Fedak3, and Michael Markl1,5

1Radiology, Northwestern Univeristy, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 4Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Univeristy, Chicago, IL, United States, 5Bioengineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States

Synopsis

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) morphology will alter transvalvular blood flow patterns and vessel wall shear stress (WSS). These hemodynamic changes have been associated with the regional expression of BAV aortopathy. However, the presence of aortic stenosis can confound the regional expression of WSS. The purpose of this study was to use aortic WSS atlases to understand the role of aortic valve morphology and stenosis on the expression of WSS in the ascending aorta of a large control and BAV patient cohort (n=312).

Purpose:

The valve morphology of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients will alter transvalvular blood flow patterns and aortic wall shear stress (WSS). These hemodynamic changes are associated with the regional expression of BAV aortopathy1, which manifests in the form of ascending aorta dilation, aneurysm formation or dissection. Two dominant patterns of aortic dilation are known to occur, that is: a ‘type 1’ pattern involving the proximal portion of the ascending aorta; or a ‘type 2’ involving the distal AAo and arch. Compared to the normal aortic valve, blood flow through the BAV is altered as a function of the valve fusion phenotype, the most commonly of which are the right-left or right-noncoronary leaflet fusion patterns. These BAV phenotypes are postulated to change downstream 3D WSS expression in aortic regions known to be at risk of dilation. Previous studies investigating these effects were based on small cohorts and the confounding role of aortic stenosis (AS) was not systematically studied. This study uses 4D flow MRI to understand the role of BAV morphology and AS on the expression of 3D WSS in the ascending aorta of a large control and BAV patient cohort (n=312).

Methods:

56 healthy volunteers (43±13 years) with no known history of cardiovascular disease and 256 BAV patients (48±14 years) underwent ECG and respiratory navigator gated 4D flow MRI exams on 1.5 and 3T MAGNETOM Avanto, Espree, Aera and Skyra MRI systems (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The BAV patients also underwent CE-MRA and bSSFP cine imaging for surveillance of aortic disease or valve degeneration. Valve morphology was determined via bSSFP and the fusion phenotype was recorded as either right-left coronary or right-noncoronary leaflet fusion. 4D flow imaging paremeters were as follows: spatial resolution=1.7-3.6x1.8–2.4x2.2–3.0mm3; temporal resolution=37–42ms, (14-25 phases); TE/TR/FA=2.2-2.8ms/4.6-5.3ms/7-15°; VENC=1.5–4.5m/s. The thoracic aorta was segmented using a commercial software package (Mimics, Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). The time frame with the maximum average absolute velocity in the segmentation was defined as peak systole. Peak velocity was assessed in a velocity maximum intensity projection (MIP) to determine subjects with significant stenosis (>3m/s). The sinus of Valsalva (SOV) and mid-ascending aortic (MAA) diameters were measured using CE-MRA. Peak systolic 3D WSS was computed along the segmented wall and WSS atlases were created using a previously published methodology2-3. In short, each aorta segmentation for a given cohort was registered to a common probability mask. This allowed for 3D WSS to be averaged across subjects and the subsequent generation of WSS atlases. Each atlas was stratified by valve morphology group (RL or RN) and presence or absence of stenosis (AS is designated as ‘+’ and no AS ’-‘). Confidence intervals were plotted using the inter-subject standard deviation (SD) of WSS on a voxel by voxel basis.

Results:

Table 1 summarizes the subject demographics, aortic geometry and peak velocity. Figure 1 summarizes the results for each 3D WSS atlas group and Figure 2 displays the associated confidence intervals. The outflow patterns were fairly consistent for the controls and across the unobstructed patients, as seen by the low magnitude of the SD maps. 41 RL and 22 RN patients were found to be significantly stenotic. In the stenotic groups, the outflow patterns varied markedly as evaluated by the confidence interval maps (Figure 2c,e where SD>1.0 in a number of locations). Markedly higher WSS was observed in the stenosis cohorts. Aortic size was similar between all four groups by Wilcoxon rank sum testing (P>0.05).

Discussion:

This is the first study in a large cohort (>250 patients) that confirms that there are clear differences in 3D WSS based on BAV phenotype and which correspond to the known differences in aortopathy expression. This further strengthens previous findings and shows that 4D flow and 3D WSS can detect patient specific changes in aortic hemodynamics. However, AS has a significant impact on these patterns and thus must be treated as a separate clinical entity for risk-stratification and patient specific resection purposes.

Conclusion:

A consistent pattern of elevated WSS was found in a large cohort of BAV patients with unobstructed RL (at the root and tubular ascending aorta) and RN (in the distal ascending aorta) valve fusion patterns, which matches with regions of known dilation patterns. Aortic valve stenosis was found to introduce marked variability in the WSS atlases. Thus, regions thought to be at-risk for further aortopathy development as determined solely by valve morphology may be altered by the presence of AS, and thus confound longitudinal outcome studies or prophylactic surgical efforts.

Acknowledgements

AHA 14POST2046015; NIH K25HL119608 & R01HL115828.

References

1. Guzzardi DG., Barker AJ., van Ooij P et al. Valve-Related Hemodynamics Mediate Human Bicuspid Aortopathy: Insights From Wall Shear Stress Mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015; 66(8): p. 892-900.

2. van Ooij P, Potters WV, Nederveen AJ et al. A methodology to detect abnormal relative wall shear stress on the full surface of the thoracic aorta using four-dimensional flow MRI, Magn Res Med. 2015; 73(3):1216-27.

3. van Ooij P, Potters WV, Collins JD et al. Characterization of Abnormal Wall Shear Stress Using 4D Flow MRI in Human Bicuspid Aortopathy, Ann Biomed Eng. 2015; 43(6):1385-97.

Figures

Table 1. Subject demographics, aortic dimensions, and peak velocity.

Figure 1. 4D flow MRI wall shear stress (WSS) atlases of the ascending aorta using a) 56 controls and 256 bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients. The BAV atlases are broken into 4 groups according to degree of stenosis and valve morphology: b-c) right-left (RL) coronary leaflet fusion patients, d-e) right-noncoronary leaflet fusion patients.

Figure 2. WSS confidence intervals (shown in terms of the standard deviation) for the data shown in Figure 1. Note the wide confidence intervals for the stenotic BAV patients, which indicate a large amount of regional WSS variation on a per patient basis (as compared to the controls and unobstructed BAV patients).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0888