Alex J Barker1, Pim van Ooij2, Emilie Bollache1, David Guzzardi3, S. Chris Malaisrie4, Patrick M McCarthy4, Jeremy D Collins1, James Carr1, Paul WM Fedak3, and Michael Markl1,5
1Radiology, Northwestern Univeristy, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 4Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Univeristy, Chicago, IL, United States, 5Bioengineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) morphology will alter transvalvular
blood flow patterns and vessel wall shear stress (WSS). These hemodynamic
changes have been associated with the regional expression of BAV aortopathy. However, the presence of aortic stenosis can confound the regional expression of WSS. The
purpose of this study was to use aortic WSS atlases to understand the role of aortic
valve morphology and stenosis on the expression of WSS in the ascending aorta of
a large control and BAV patient cohort (n=312).Purpose:
The valve morphology of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients
will alter transvalvular blood flow patterns and aortic wall shear stress
(WSS). These hemodynamic changes are associated with the regional expression of
BAV aortopathy
1, which manifests in the form of ascending aorta
dilation, aneurysm formation or dissection. Two dominant patterns of aortic
dilation are known to occur, that is: a ‘type 1’ pattern involving the proximal
portion of the ascending aorta; or a ‘type 2’ involving the distal AAo and arch.
Compared to the normal aortic valve, blood flow through the BAV is
altered as a function of the valve fusion phenotype, the most commonly of which
are the right-left or right-noncoronary leaflet fusion patterns. These BAV
phenotypes are postulated to change downstream 3D WSS expression in aortic
regions known to be at risk of dilation. Previous studies investigating these
effects were based on small cohorts and the confounding role of aortic stenosis
(AS) was not systematically studied. This study uses 4D flow MRI to understand
the role of BAV morphology and AS on the expression of 3D WSS in the ascending
aorta of a large control and BAV patient cohort (n=312).
Methods:
56
healthy volunteers (43±13 years) with no known history of cardiovascular
disease and 256 BAV patients (48±14 years) underwent ECG and respiratory
navigator gated 4D flow MRI exams on 1.5 and 3T MAGNETOM Avanto, Espree, Aera
and Skyra MRI systems (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The BAV patients also
underwent CE-MRA and bSSFP cine imaging for surveillance of aortic disease or
valve degeneration. Valve morphology was determined via bSSFP and the fusion
phenotype was recorded as either right-left coronary or right-noncoronary
leaflet fusion. 4D
flow imaging paremeters were as follows: spatial resolution=1.7-3.6x1.8–2.4x2.2–3.0mm
3; temporal
resolution=37–42ms, (14-25 phases); TE/TR/FA=2.2-2.8ms/4.6-5.3ms/7-15°; VENC=1.5–4.5m/s. The thoracic aorta was segmented using a
commercial software package (Mimics, Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). The time frame with the maximum average absolute
velocity in the segmentation was defined as peak systole. Peak velocity was
assessed in a velocity maximum intensity projection (MIP) to determine subjects
with significant stenosis (>3m/s). The sinus of Valsalva (SOV) and
mid-ascending aortic (MAA) diameters were measured using CE-MRA. Peak systolic 3D WSS was computed along the segmented wall and WSS atlases were created using a previously
published methodology
2-3. In short, each aorta segmentation for a
given cohort was registered to a common probability mask. This allowed for 3D
WSS to be averaged across subjects and the subsequent generation of WSS atlases.
Each atlas was stratified by valve morphology group (RL or RN) and presence or
absence of stenosis (AS is designated as ‘+’ and no AS ’-‘). Confidence
intervals were plotted using the inter-subject standard deviation (SD) of WSS
on a voxel by voxel basis.
Results:
Table 1 summarizes the subject demographics, aortic
geometry and peak velocity. Figure 1 summarizes the results for each 3D WSS
atlas group and Figure 2 displays the associated confidence intervals. The
outflow patterns were fairly consistent for the controls and across the
unobstructed patients, as seen by the low magnitude of the SD maps. 41 RL and
22 RN patients were found to be significantly stenotic. In the stenotic groups,
the outflow patterns varied markedly as evaluated by the confidence interval
maps (Figure 2c,e where SD>1.0 in a
number of locations). Markedly higher WSS was observed in the stenosis cohorts.
Aortic size was similar between all four groups by Wilcoxon rank sum testing
(P>0.05).
Discussion:
This is the first study in a large cohort (>250
patients) that confirms that there are clear differences in 3D WSS based on BAV
phenotype and which correspond to the known differences in aortopathy
expression. This further strengthens previous findings and shows that 4D flow
and 3D WSS can detect patient specific changes in aortic hemodynamics. However, AS has a significant impact on
these patterns and thus must be treated as a separate clinical entity for
risk-stratification and patient specific resection purposes.
Conclusion:
A
consistent pattern of elevated WSS was found in a large cohort of BAV patients
with unobstructed RL (at the root and tubular ascending aorta) and RN (in the
distal ascending aorta) valve fusion patterns, which matches with regions of known dilation patterns. Aortic valve
stenosis was found to introduce marked variability in the WSS atlases. Thus, regions
thought to be at-risk for further aortopathy development as determined solely
by valve morphology may be altered by the presence of AS, and thus confound longitudinal
outcome studies or prophylactic surgical efforts.
Acknowledgements
AHA 14POST2046015; NIH K25HL119608 & R01HL115828.References
1. Guzzardi DG., Barker AJ., van Ooij P et al.
Valve-Related Hemodynamics Mediate Human Bicuspid Aortopathy: Insights From
Wall Shear Stress Mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015; 66(8): p. 892-900.
2. van Ooij P, Potters WV, Nederveen AJ et al. A methodology to detect abnormal relative wall shear stress on the full
surface of the thoracic aorta using four-dimensional flow MRI, Magn Res Med. 2015; 73(3):1216-27.
3. van Ooij P, Potters WV, Collins JD et al. Characterization of Abnormal Wall Shear Stress Using 4D Flow MRI in
Human Bicuspid Aortopathy, Ann Biomed Eng. 2015; 43(6):1385-97.