Marc Kouwenhoven1, Silke Hey1, Christine Nabuurs1, Alan Huang1, Adri Duijndam1, Elwin de Weerdt1, Holger Eggers2, Niels Blanken3, and Tim Leiner3
1Philips, Best, Netherlands, 2Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany, 3Radiology Dept., University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
In this work, the feasibility is explored for subtractionless
first-pass time-resolved contrast enhanced MRA of the lower legs on 1.5T using Dixon, viewsharing
and parallel imaging with high acceleration factors. Results in seven consecutive
patients are analyzed and compared with the conventional subtraction method. It is demonstrated that with the subtractionless
method, bulk motion artifacts are eliminated, and SNR is significantly increased.Introduction
Recently, a subtractionless Dixon
method was proposed for first-pass stepping-table peripheral MRA, which relies
on fat suppression instead of subtraction to reduce the background signal [1].
Advantages were shown to be higher SNR and CNR, robustness to motion, and a shorter
scan time.
Time resolved MRA of the
lower legs has been shown to be beneficial as an add-on to multi-station
peripheral MRA for patients with critical limb ischemia [2]. Time resolved MRA of the lower leg vessels using
viewsharing techniques has been shown to be feasible [2,3] using
subtraction of a mask to suppress background signal in all dynamic phases.
Dixon has been applied on 3T with
time resolved viewsharing techniques for dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI of
the breast [4], and with time-resolved subtractionless CE-MRA using
an interleaved variable density sampling pattern [5].
Purpose
The purpose of this work is
to investigate the feasibility and show the potential benefits of time resolved
subtractionless contrast enhanced MRA on 1.5T with viewsharing and a large FOV
in the lower legs, using mDixon with flexible (shortest) echo times and
parallel imaging with high acceleration factors. The novel approach was
compared to conventional subtraction-based time-resolved MRA.
Methods
Seven patients with known or
suspected peripheral vascular disease were examined on an Ingenia 1.5T scanner
(Philips, Best, Netherlands) using the standard Anterior Body Coil and the
built-in posterior coil. A single dose
of Gadobutrol (Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany) was used, with an
injection speed of 1 mL/sec. 3D
volumetric images were acquired with a FOV of 430 x 430 mm
2 and a
volume thickness of 150 mm, using a T1-weighted spoiled
dual-gradient-echo sequence with a bandwidth of 610 Hz/pixel and a TE
1/TE
2/TR of
1.8/3.6/5.6 ms. Acquired spatial resolution was 1.1 x 1.1 x
2.0 mm
3; data was reconstructed to 1 x 1 x 1 mm
3. An eightfold acceleration by parallel imaging
(SENSE) was used, with a partial Fourier factor of 0.65, which together with the
use of an elliptical k-space shutter resulted in a net acceleration of 15.5x. Viewsharing was applied with a keyhole
percentage of 15% and a peripheral sampling density of 25% [3,4,6],
resulting in an additional 2.76 fold increase in temporal resolution. Compared to fully sampled conventional
scanning, this resulted in a total net acceleration factor of 43. The temporal
resolution per dynamic phase was 5.5 sec, with a temporal footprint of 19.5
sec. To enable comparison with
conventional subtraction, a mask was acquired at the beginning of the
acquisition. 12-19 dynamic phases were
acquired. Total scan time was 1:25-2:00
minutes. Water images were reconstructed using mDixon reconstruction
capable of handling flexible echo times, using a multi-peak spectral fat model [7].
Source modulus images were obtained from the first echo. The comparison between
water and subtracted modulus images could thus be made from the same
acquisition.
Results
In 1/7 patients (14%)
significant motion was observed, corrupting the subtraction images; in a
further 2/7 patients (28%) only mild motion was observed.
Compared to the subtracted modulus images, the SNR in
the unsubtracted Dixon water images was increased by a factor of 1.89 (SD 0.19) on average.
Coronal MIPs obtained in two patients
with disease in the tibial and peroneal arteries are shown in Fig. 1, 2 and 3. The effect of bulk motion is shown in Fig. 4,
where misregistration artifacts in the subtracted modulus images significantly increases
the background signal. As can be seen
from the water images in Fig. 4, the subtractionless mDixon method effectively
eliminates these motion artifacts.
Discussion
Compared to the subtracted modulus images, the increase
in SNR for the unsubtracted Dixon water images was a factor of 1.89 on average,
which is in line with theoretical predictions [8]. No significant water-fat swap artifacts were
observed, despite the echo
spacing of 1.8 ms, which is relatively short for Dixon on 1.5T. The viewsharing
and high acceleration factor allowed a sufficiently high temporal resolution with
a relatively thick 3D volume, which facilitates easy planning.
Conclusion
The feasibility of time-resolved subtractionless MRA
with viewsharing, Dixon and parallel imaging with a high acceleration factor
has been demonstrated in this work on patients at 1.5T. The main advantages of the subtractionless
method are nearly doubled SNR and the elimination of misregistration artifacts
due to bulk patient motion. Both advantages
can contribute to better clinical imaging, since the main indication for time-resolved
MRA of the lower legs is for patients with critical limb ischemia, which often
find it difficult to lay still for a longer period, and in which it can be
important to visualize small (collateral) vessels.
Acknowledgements
References
1. Leiner T, Habets J, Versluis B, Geerts L, Alberts E,
Blanken N, Hendrikse J, Vonken EJ, Eggers H. Subtractionless first-pass single
contrast medium dose peripheral MR angiography using two-point Dixon fat
suppression. Eur Radiol 2013;23(8):2228-2235.
2. Andreisek G, Pfammatter T, Goepfert K, Nanz D, Hervo
P, Koppensteiner R, Weishaupt D. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients:
standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography. Radiology
2007;242(2):610-620.
3. Voth M, Haneder S, Huck K, Gutfleisch A, Schonberg
SO, Michaely HJ. Peripheral magnetic resonance angiography with continuous
table movement in combination with high spatial and temporal resolution
time-resolved MRA With a total single dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of gadobutrol at 3.0
T. Invest Radiol 2009;44(9):627-633.
4. Le Y, Kroeker R, Kipfer HD, Lin C. Development and
evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved
acquisition efficiency and fat suppression. J Magn Reson Imaging
2012;36(2):483-491.
5. Morrison CK, Rahimi MS, Wang K, Holmes JH, Bannas P,
Motosugi U, Korosec FR. Time-resolved Dixon MR angiography of patients with
peripheral vascular disease at 3.0 T, Abstract 0241, Proceedings of the joint ISMRM-ESMRMB meeting, 2014, Milan, Italy.
6. Lim RP, Shapiro M, Wang EY, Law M, Babb JS, Rueff
LE, Jacob JS, Kim S, Carson RH, Mulholland TP, Laub G, Hecht EM. 3D
time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries with time-resolved
imaging with stochastic trajectories: comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced
Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D time-of-flight MRA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2008;29(10):1847-1854.
7. Eggers H, Brendel B, Duijndam A, Herigault G.
Dual-echo Dixon imaging with flexible choice of echo times. Magn Reson Med
2011;65(1):96-107.
8. Stinson EG, Trzasko JD, Weavers PT, Riederer
SJ. Dixon-type and subtraction-type contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance
angiography: A theoretical and experimental comparison of SNR and CNR. Magn Reson Med 2015; 74:81-92