Synopsis
A new
model-based approach using low-rank and sparsity constraints is presented for
reconstructing the accelerated magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF)
time-series images. By enabling high-quality reconstructions of
contrast-weighted images from highly-undersampled data, the proposed method produces more accurate estimates
of tissue parameter maps compared to the conventional gridding based reconstruction
of the time-series. Ultimately, the goal is to reduce imaging time for MRF
acquisitions and improve spatial resolution. Introduction
Magnetic resonance
fingerprinting (MRF)
[1] provides a new paradigm to simultaneously acquire
multiple tissue parameter maps (e.g., T1, T2, and spin
density maps). The conventional MRF reconstruction is a matched filter based,
non-iterative approach, which estimates tissue parameter maps from
artifact-corrupted gridded reconstructions of a highly-undersampled spiral data. This
approach often requires relatively long acquisition time to obtain accurate
parameter maps. To alleviate such difficulty, a maximum likelihood (ML) approach
[2] has recently been proposed to enable parameter estimation directly from undersampled k-space data. Nonetheless, the ML reconstruction only
makes use of the Bloch equation based data model and noise characteristics. Further
improvement can be achieved by incorporating a proper image prior model into
the reconstruction process. In this work, we present a model-based approach
using joint low-rank and sparse structure to improve the spatial reconstructions
of the MRF time series. Tissue parameter maps are then derived from improved time series by the dictionary matching, which are shown to substantially
benefit from high-quality time series reconstruction. Representative results
from an in vivo experiment are shown to demonstrate the effectiveness of the
proposed method.
Method
Let $$$\mathbf{C} \in \mathbb{C}^{N \times M}$$$ denote the Casorati matrix [3] representing a contrast-weighted image sequence associated with an MRF experiment. Due to the strong spatiotemporal correlation of these images, a low-rank model is introduced to represent $$$\mathbf{C} $$$, i.e., $$$\mathbf{C} = \mathbf{U}\mathbf{V}$$$, where $$$\mathbf{U} \in \mathbb{C}^{N \times L}$$$ and $$$\mathbf{V} \in \mathbb{C}^{L \times M}$$$ respectively denote the spatial and temporal subspaces of $$$\mathbf{C}$$$, and $$$L$$$ denotes the rank. We further pre-estimate the temporal subspace for the low-rank model, denoted as $$$\hat{\mathbf{V}}$$$, from the ensemble of magnetization dynamics using the principled component analysis [3-6]. Additionally, we incorporate a joint sparsity constraint to capture correlated edge structure of co-registered contrast-weighted images, regularizing the ill-conditioned low-rank reconstruction [7, 8]. Putting together the above constraints, the reconstruction problem can be formulated as
$$\hat{\mathbf{U}}=\text{arg min}_{\mathbf{U}}\sum_{c=1}^{N_c}||\mathbf{d}_c-\mathbf{F}_u\mathbf{S}_c\mathbf{U}\hat{\mathbf{V}}||_2^2+\lambda ||\mathbf{D}\mathbf{U}\hat{\mathbf{V}}||_{1, 2},$$
where $$$\mathbf{d}_c$$$ denotes the acquired $$$\mathbf{k}$$$-space data from the $$$c$$$th coil, $$$\mathbf{F}_u$$$ the undersampled Fourier encoding matrix, $$$\mathbf{S}_c$$$ the coil sensitivities associated with the $$$c$$$th coil, $$$\mathbf{D}$$$ the spatial finite difference matrix, and $$$\lambda$$$ the regularization parameter. The above formulation results in a convex optimization problem, for which we apply the alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm [9]. After obtaining $$$\hat{\mathbf{U}}$$$, we form $$$\hat{\mathbf{C}} = \hat{\mathbf{U}}\hat{\mathbf{V}}$$$, from which we apply the dictionary matching as the conventional approach.
Results
A 2D in vivo MRF experiment
was performed on a 3T Siemens scanner with a 32 channel head coil using
an identical IR FISP sequence, spiral trajectory, and flip angles and TRs as in [10].
The acquisition parameters include: FOV = 300×300 mm2,
matrix size = 256×256, and slice thickness = 5 mm. For each acquisition
parameter, a single spiral interleave was used (the fully sampled data requires
48 interleaves). We acquired data with 1000 TRs (i.e., corresponding to the
duration of 13.1s) to obtain a set of sparsely-sampled data for image
reconstruction. To obtain a fully sampled “gold standard” for
comparison, the above experiment was repeated 48 times, rotating the spiral
trajectory. For the sparsely-sampled data, we applied
the conventional MRF reconstruction, ML reconstruction, and the proposed
method. For the proposed method, we empirically chose the model order and
regularization parameter for the optimized performance. Fig. 1 shows the MRF time series reconstructions from the gridding reconstruction and proposed method. As opposed to the conventional approach, which estimates parameter maps from the artifact-corrupted gridding reconstruction, the proposed method provides much higher quality contrast-weighted images for subsequent parameter estimation. Quantitatively, Figs. 2-4 show the reconstructed T1, T2, and spin
density maps from different methods. Clearly, the proposed method significantly outperforms the
conventional MRF reconstruction, and results in more than a factor of two
reduction in the reconstruction errors for all three parameter maps. Compared
to the ML reconstruction, it also shows noticeable
improvement, especially for the T2 map. This illustrates the power of
incorporating a prior image model to improve the reconstruction performance.
Discussion
To enhance the computational
efficiency of the conventional approach, a low-rank/subspace model
[11] was recently proposed to compress the dictionary (or k-space data) before
the gridding reconstruction. Note that this is fundamentally different from the
proposed method in which the low-rank model is used to enable high-quality
reconstruction of contrast-weighted images from sub-Nyquist data.
Conclusion
This work presented
a new model-based approach using low-rank and sparsity constraints for accelerated
MRF. It enables much more accurate reconstructions of tissue parameter maps over
the conventional approach and recently proposed ML approach with limited
data.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by research grants: NIH-R01-EB017219, NIH-R01-EB017337, NIH-P41-EB015896, NIH-U01-MH093765, NIH-R00-EB012107, and NIH-R24-MH106096. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Mark Griswold at Case Western Reserve University for sharing the MRF pulse sequences for in vivo experiments.References
[1] D. Ma, V. Gulani, N. Seiberlich, K. Liu, J. L. Sunshine, J. L. Suerk, and M. A. Griswold, "Magnetic resonance fingerprinting", Nature, vol. 495, pp.187-192, 2013.
[2] B. Zhao, F. Lam, B. Bilgic, H. Ye, and K. Setsompop, "Maximum likelihood reconstruction for magnetic resonance fingerprinting", IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging, pp. 905-909, 2015.
[3] Z.-P. Liang, "Spatiotemporal imaging with partially separable functions", IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging, pp. 988-991, 2007.
[4] A. S. Gupta and Z.-P. Liang, "Dynamic imaging by temporal modeling with principle component analysis", Proc. Int. Symp. Magn. Reson. Med., p 10, 2001.
[5] C. Huang, C.G. Graff, E. W. Clarkson, A. Bilgin, and M. I. Altbach, "T2 mapping from highly undersampled data by reconstruction of principal componentcoefficient maps using compressed sensing". Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 67, pp. 1355–1366, 2012.
[6] J. P. Haldar and Z.-P. Liang, "Spatiotemporal imaging with partially separable functions: a matrix recovery approach", IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging, pp. 716-719, 2010.
[7] B. Zhao, W. Lu, T. K. Hitchens, F. Lam, C. Ho, and Z.-P. Liang, "Accelerated MR parameter mapping with low-rank and sparsity constraints", Magn. Reson. Med., 2015, in press.
[8] S. Lingala, Y. Hu, E. DiBella, and M. Jacob, "Accelerated dynamic MRI exploiting sparsity and low-rank structure: k-t SLR", IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging., vol. 30, pp. 1042-1054, 2011.
[9] S. Ramani and J. A. Fessler, "Parallel MR image reconstruction using augmented Lagrangian methods", IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging., vol. 30, pp. 694-706, 2011.
[10] Y. Jiang, D. Ma, N. Seiberlich, V. Gulani, and M. A. Griswold, "MR fingerprinting using fast imaging with steady state precession (FISP) with spiral readout", Magn. Reson. Med., 2015, in press.
[11] D. McGivney, E. Pierre, D. Ma, Y. Jiang, H. Saybasili, V. Gulani, and M. A. Griswold, "SVD compression for magnetic resonance fingerprinting in the time domain," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 33, pp. 2311–2322, 2014.