Gregory Simchick1,2, Martha Betancur3,4, Lohitash Karumbaiah3,4, and Qun Zhao1,2
1Physics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States, 2Bio-Imaging Research Center, Athens, GA, United States, 3Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States, 4Regenerative Bioscience Center, Athens, GA, United States
Synopsis
Due
to both short-term and long-term effects, traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) have
been a growing topic of interest over the last several years; therefore,
research related to the development of new methods to treat and monitor these
types of injuries has also gained interest. Presented here is a non-invasive
method using magnetic resonance (MR) phase gradient mapping (PGM) to
characterize TBI treatment in relation to regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF)
in angiogenesis and tissue loss. In a rat moderate-to-severe TBI model,
increases between 16-29% in rCBF were seen in the treatment group twenty weeks
post TBI, while decreases between 9-27% in rCBF were seen in the non-treatment
group.Purpose
To
evaluate the long-term effectiveness of traumatic brain injury (TBI) treatment
in relation to regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in angiogenesis and tissue
loss using magnetic resonance (MR) phase gradient mapping (PGM).
Theory
The fractional change in blood flow through a vessel can be written as$$f=\frac{\mp R_{pc}}{1-R_{pc}}$$where the relative phase change$$R_{pc}=\frac{\pm (\triangle \phi_{1}-\triangle \phi_{0})}{\triangle \phi_{0}}$$with Δφ0 and Δφ1 representing the change in phase between the vessel and the surrounding tissue at two different time points1. The relative phase change can theoretically be calculated using just the phase difference within the vessels at the two time points1; however, variations in the MRI scanning procedure (coil tuning, gradient shimming, etc.) can cause additional changes in the phase. By using the change in phase between the vessel and the surrounding tissue, these variations are removed1. To avoid MRI phase wrapping effects, the change in the phase gradient can be used to calculate the fractional change in rCBF since it’s proportional to the change in phase. The equation$$\triangledown_{x}\phi=\triangledown_{x}P\approx\frac{\triangle P}{\triangle x}$$illustrates this relationship, where φ denotes the wrapped phase and P denotes the real phase2. The phase gradient can be calculated using$$\triangledown_{x}\phi=\cos\phi*FT^{-1}[k_{x}*FT(\sin\phi)]-\sin\phi*FT^{-1}[k_{x}*FT(\cos\phi)]$$where FT and FT-1 refer to the forward and inverse Fourier Transforms and $$k_{x}=\frac{i*\sin(\frac{2\pi l}{L_{x}})}{\triangle x}$$with Lx being the number of voxels in the x-direction and Δx being the voxel size3.
Experiments and Methods
TBIs were performed
on six rats using a custom designed controlled cortical impactor
4.
The left
fronto-parietal cortex was impacted using a 3mm diameter flat tip driven at a
velocity of 2.25m/s, to a depth of 2mm, and for a dwell-time of 250ms after
performing a 5mm unilateral craniotomy 0.5mm from the bregma and the lateral suture. Two
additional rats received craniotomies, but not TBIs. These rats served as
controls. Two days post-TBI, one rat received an injection of chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycan hydrogel with neural stem cells and trophic factors (GAG-NSCs-TF), and two rats received the
same injection without NSCs (GAG-TF). To evaluate long-term effects, twenty weeks post TBI all rats (2 controls, 3
non-treatments, 3 treatments) were scanned using a MGEMS
pulse sequence on a 7T Varian Magnex MRI scanner with parameters: TR=600ms,
8 echoes (TE=10-45ms in 5ms increments), FA=25°, FOV=40x40mm, and 8 slices with
thickness=1mm centered on the injury. Phase gradient maps (PGMs) were
calculated for each slice in both the readout and phase encoding directions using equations 4 and 5. From these PGMs, phase gradient
differences between a vessel and the surrounding tissue were measured across
all distinguishable vessels located within the cortex, sub-cortical and basal
forebrain areas, and thalamus. It was determined that TE=20ms produced the best contrast for
distinguishing vessels within the PGMs, so the third echo was used for all
measurements (see Figure 1). Since direct comparisons of the same vessels from the same rats
were not made, phase variations
in the MRI scanning procedure aren’t automatically removed using equation 2. To
account for these variations, measurements were normalized using the phase
gradient difference across the third ventricle for each rat. Averages and standard deviations of all
normalized phase gradient differences were calculated for both the
contralateral and ipsilateral side of the brain to the injury for each region
and group, and fractional changes in rCBF between groups were determined using
equations 1 and 2.
Results and Discussion
The treatment group consistently showed increases in rCBF compared to
the control group in all regions on both the contralateral and ipsilateral
sides of the brain, while the non-treatment group consistently showed decreases
in rCBF (see Figure 2). The
increases in rCBF in the treatment group suggest that angiogenesis is occurring
and that tissue loss has been stunted
5. The decreases in rCBF in the
non-treatment group suggest that angiogenesis is not occurring, so greater
tissue loss is expected. Brain dissection confirmed increased tissue loss in the
non-treatment group compared to the treatment group (see Figure 3). Variations between
animals of the same group and the small sample size of each group (n=2 or 3) likely
contribute to the significant variations in the changes in rCBF in Figure 2. Further correlation
with global CBF measured by arterial spin labeling will be conducted, and histology
and staining will be performed to look for angiogenesis.
To summarize, changes in rCBF in a rat TBI
model were calculated using phase gradient differences measured across vessels
within different areas of the rat brain. Rats that received GAG-NSCs-TF or GAG-TF showed increases
in rCBF compared to the control group, while rats that did not receive treatment
showed decreases in rCBF. Comparing these results with dissection suggests that
an increase in CBF relates to a greater effectiveness of treatment concerning
reduction in tissue loss and possibly increased angiogenesis.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the grant support of National Institute of Health grant (S10RR023706), and Dr. Khan Hekmatyar for assistance in MR data acquisition.References
1. Shen, Y. M. et al. In vivo measurement of tissue damage, oxygen saturation
changes and blood flow changes after experimental traumatic brain injury in
rats using susceptibility weighted imaging. Magn
Reson Imaging 25, 219-227,
doi:10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.018 (2007).
2. Bakker, C. J. G., de Leeuw, H.,
Vincken, K. L., Vonken, E. J. & Hendrikse, J. Phase gradient mapping as an
aid in the analysis of object-induced and system-related phase perturbations in
MRI. Phys Med Biol 53, N349-N358,
doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/N02 (2008).
3. Wang, L. N., Potter, W. M. &
Zhao, Q. In vivo quantification of SPIO nanoparticles for cell labeling based
on MR phase gradient images. Contrast
Media Mol I 10, 43-50,
doi:10.1002/cmmi.1601 (2015).
4. Dixon, C. E., Clifton, G. L.,
Lighthall, J. W., Yaghmai, A. A. & Hayes, R. L. A Controlled Cortical
Impact Model of Traumatic Brain Injury in the Rat. J Neurosci Meth 39,
253-262 (1991).
5. Ding, G. L. et al. Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Sildenafil
Treatment of Embolic Stroke in Aged Rats. Stroke
42, 3537-3541,
doi:10.1161/Strokeaha.111.622092 (2011).