Proton MR spectroscopy identifies neuronal damage consistent with gray/white matter interface involvement in mild traumatic brain injury
Ivan Kirov1,2, Matthew S. Davitz1,2, Assaf Tal3, James S. Babb1,2, Robert I Grossman1,2, Yvonne W Lui1,4, and Oded Gonen1,2

1Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 3Chemical Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, 4Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York, NY, United States

Synopsis

Basic science studies have posited that the mechanical force associated with a traumatic brain injury disproportionately affects the interface between the brain’s gray and white matter (GM, WM); however, this has not yet been demonstrated in vivo. In this study we used multivoxel proton MR spectroscopy to compare metabolite levels of patients and controls in voxels with different GM and WM partial volume, on a continuum from “pure” GM to “pure” WM. The results indicate that the largest amount of damage lies within voxels representative of interface tissue.

Introduction

Axonal injury is the histopathological hallmark of traumatic brain injury (TBI)1. Early ex vivo studies noticed that axonal changes frequently occur at sites where axons change their anatomical course, such as over blood vessels and within the gray/white matter (GM/WM) interface, where another factor that predisposes them to injury is the change in tissue density2-4. Additionally, recently it was established that the histopathological hallmark of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (which is thought to be caused by repetitive TBI) are tau deposits at the depths of cerebral sulci5. Our goal, therefore, was to investigate whether changes consistent with injury at the GM/WM interface can be imaged in vivo. Since conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is not sensitive to crossing fiber damage, as at the GM/WM interface, we used proton MR spectroscopic imaging (1H-MRSI), through quantification of the neuronal marker N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), as well as of creatine (Cr), choline (Cho) and myo-inositol (mI) for energy and glial status. The strategy was to compare the degree of injury amongst voxels with different GM and WM partial volume, on a continuum from “pure” GM to “pure” WM. The hypothesis was that the amount of injury within WM voxels with small GM partial volume would be larger than the injury within “pure” WM voxels.

Methods

Subjects: Fifteen symptomatic mild TBI patients (Table 1) and 12 age- and gender-matched controls. Data acquisition: T1-weighted MRI (MP-RAGE), T2-weighted MRI (FLAIR), B0 shimming, 10×8×4.5 cm (AP×LR×IS)=360 cm3 1H-MRS VOI (PRESS TE/TR=35/1800 ms), encoded to 480 voxels, each 1.0×1.0×0.75 cm3 (Fig. 1). Metabolite quantification: Absolute metabolite amounts were obtained using phantom replacement with correction for T1 and T2 relaxation time differences. Only voxels with metabolite Cramer Rao lower bounds<20% and 4<linewidths<13 Hz were retained. Segmentation: Global GM, WM and cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) masks were obtained from the MP-RAGE using SPM. Mask thresholding: The masks were co-registered with the 1H-MRSI matrix, yielding their volume in every 1H-MRSI voxel (Fig. 2). Any voxels containing more than 10% CSF were excluded. Voxels were then grouped into 10 bins, each with a different fraction of WM, corresponding to a gradient from “pure” GM to “pure” WM. The bins were: 0-9% WM (“pure” GM, i.e. 81%<GM<100%, considering possible 0%<CSF<10%), 10-19% WM, etc. up to 90-100% WM (“pure” WM). For each of the bins, concentrations of each metabolite were compared between patients and controls with unequal variance t tests with voxel count as a weighting factor (i.e., giving greater weight to data values with higher voxel counts).

Results

The metabolite concentrations of patients and controls at each of the 10 bins are shown in Fig. 3. There were statistically significant differences only for NAA: within the 20-29% bin, as well as in all bins over 40-49%, as shown in Fig. 4. The regression of the mean NAA group difference to bin number showed a significant non-linear association (p=0.017 for the quadratic term). The regression model to predict the mean difference as a quadratic function of bin number was given by the equation: predicted mean NAA difference = -0.196 + 0.271*(bin number) - 0.0178*(bin number)exp(2) (Fig. 4). This regression equation explained 79.3% of the variance in the group mean NAA differences across bins and implied that the mean group difference increases as a function of bin number from a global minimum within bin 0-9% WM (“pure” GM) to a projected maximum within the 60-69% WM bin (at 60.6%) and decreases as a function of increasing bin number (WM fraction) thereafter.

Discussion

Our hypothesis was supported by the findings. First, the bin with the largest numerical difference between patients and controls had 80-89% WM. Second, the bin predicted by the fitted model function to contain the maximum difference was of 60-69% WM. Both observations indicate larger amount of injury within voxels with small partial GM content, compared to “pure” WM voxels. A limitation of the study is that it was impossible to confirm that within the mixed-tissue voxels, all WM eventually terminates within the GM voxel. This source of noise, however, is unavoidable, given the inherent course spatial resolution of 1H-MRS, and was addressed by the large number of analyzed voxels. Our findings need confirmation in other cohorts, with 1H-MRS, as well as with advanced DTI, sensitive to crossing fiber geometry.

Conclusion

We present evidence consistent with neuronal damage at the site of the GM/WM interface in mild TBI. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to image and differentiate this injury in vivo. This has important implications for injury detection in TBI, potentially revealing an injury locale not well characterized previously.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grants NS050520, NS29029, EB01015 and the Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R, www.cai2r.net), a NIBIB Biomedical Technology Resource Center (NIH P41 EB017183). Assaf Tal acknowledges the support of the Monroy-Marks Career Development Fund, the Carolito Stiftung Fund, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust and the historic generosity of the Harold Perlman Family.

References

1. Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH. Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 2013. 246: 35-43.

2. Grady MS, McLaughlin MR, Christman CW, Valadka AB, Fligner CL, Povlishock JT. The use of antibodies targeted against the neurofilament subunits for the detection of diffuse axonal injury in humans. J Neuropath Exp Neurol 1993. 52 (2). 143-152.

3. Glass TF, Fabian MJ, Schweitzer JB, Weinberg JA, Proctor KG. The impact of hypercarbia on the evolution of brain injury in a porcine model of traumatic brain injury and systemic hemorrhage. J Neurotrauma. 2001 Jan;18(1):57-71.

4. Singleton RH, Zhu J, Stone JR, Povlishock JT. Traumatically induced axotomy adjacent to the soma does not result in acute neuronal death. J Neurosci. 2002 Feb 1;22(3):791-802.

5. Bieniek KF, Ross OA, Cormier KA, Walton RL, Soto-Ortolaza A, Johnston AE, DeSaro P, Boylan KB, Graff-Radford NR, Wszolek ZK, Rademakers R, Boeve BF, McKee AC, Dickson DW. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology in a neurodegenerative disorders brain bank. Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Oct 30. [Epub ahead of print]

Figures

Table 1: Patient demographic and clinical data

1Days, GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale


Figure 1: 1H-MRSI positioning and example spectra

Sagittal (a), axial (b) and coronal (c) MR images superimposed with the 8×10×4.5 cm 1H-MRSI volume-of-interest (solid line) and the 16×16 cm field-of-view (dashed line). HSI=Hadamard Spectroscopic Imaging; CSI=Chemical Shift Imaging.

d. The spectral matrix from (b), with voxel size shown.


Figure 2: Mask fractions

Each of the six 1H-MRSI slices of a single subject overlaid with the volume-of-interest (white rectangle). Anatomy, NAA concentrations, and GM, WM and CSF fractions in each voxel are shown as heat maps.


Figure 3: Metabolite concentrations (in millimolar, mM) of patients (gray) and controls (white) at each of the 10 WM bins


Figure 4: Absolute differences between patients' and controls' NAA concentration at each of the 10 bins

Statistically significant differences are shown with p values, and the best-fit regression function is shown with a dashed line.




Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0861