Jiachen Zhuo1, Hegang Chen2, Bizhan Aarabi3, Jay Menaker4, Rao Gullapalli1, and Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan1
1Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 4Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Convention MRI is the imaging
modality of choice to demonstrate the anatomical location and extent in spinal
cord injury (SCI) following trauma. However, quantitative and qualitative
lesion parameters within the cord are of limited use in predicting patient
neurological outcomes. In this study we demonstrated that acute DTI
measurements improve model prediction for 1 year AISA score following blunt
cervical SCI. Among all DTI measurements, axial diffusivity, while not radial
diffusivity, showed strong effect in predicting outcome, indicating that axonal
injury in the cord may be the main factor affecting patient recovery. Introduction
Convention MRI is the imaging modality of choice to
demonstrate the anatomical location and extent in spinal cord injury (SCI) following
trauma. However, quantitative and qualitative lesion parameters such as lesion
length, maximum spinal cord compression, spinal cord swelling, and presence of
hemorrhage within the cord are of limited use in predicting patient
neurological outcomes
1,2. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the
c-spine has shown great promise in detecting severity of spinal cord injury
3,
which may provide valuable biomarker for patient recovery. In this prospective longitudinal
study, we aimed to investigate if acute admission DTI parameters can predict
patient neurological outcome at 1 year, using the American Spinal Injury
Association (ASIA) motor scores.
Methods
The study included 30 blunt
cervical SCI patients (24 male, 6 female; age: 51.7±17.5) admitted to our trauma
center. All patients had a cord contusion seen on conventional MRI, at levels between
C2 to C7. MRI imaging was performed acutely within 24 hours of injury. 16
patients were followed up to 1 year and ASIA motor scores were measured. 15 volunteers (12 male, 3 female; age: 45.67 ± 12.94)
served as controls.
All MRI were performed on a 1.5T Siemens
Avanto scanner. MR imaging included sagittal T2, FLAIR, and axial T2, T2* and
3D susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) images. DTI were acquired using
single-shot EPI sequence (TE/TR=87/2800ms, resolution=128 × 128, FOV=20cm,
sl.thick=4mm) with 20 directions at b-value of 700 s/mm2 and 3
averages. A total of 20 axial slices were acquired centered at the location of the
contusion for patients. For volunteers, three acquisitions were performed with slices
placed at upper (lower brainstem to C2), mid (C3-C5) and lower (C6 to T1) sections.
DTI data were reconstructed offline
using Diffusion Toolkit (www.trackvis.org) for mean
diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD) and radial
diffusivity (RD) maps. An experienced radiologist drew region of interest (ROI)
to include the contusion based on T2 and STIR sequences and avoided areas of
hemorrhage based on T2* and SWI sequences using Trackvis tool. Hemorrhage within
SCI was identified based on T2* and SWI sequences (HC: hemorrhagic contusion,
non-HC: non-hemorrhagic contusion). In
volunteers, three ROIs were drawn on upper, mid and lower sections of the
C-spine. Due to the potential diffusion tensor differences based on c-spine
location, the DTI values within the lesion were further normalized by control
values based on lesion location. T-tests were performed to compare regional
values of patients and controls. Stepwise regression analysis was performed to find
relevant parameters (normalized DTI values, age, gender, HC or non-HC) that
correlated with patient ASIA score at 1yr.
Results
Figure 1 showed the patient DTI values as compared to different
sections of normal volunteers (Lower, Mid, Upper). In volunteers, MD and RD
reduces from lower to upper sections, while FA increases from lower to upper
sections. AD only differs between the lower and mid sections. Significantly
lower FA, AD and higher RD was observed in SCI. Stepwise
regression found age and gender had no effect for outcome, while presence of
hemorrhage within the SCI (HC) and specific DTI parameter as important factors in
patient outcome (p<0.0001). Among the four DTI parameters, including
AD in the regression model provided the best results (r
2=0.93, p =
0.0019). Other significant DTI parameters included MD (r
2=0.89, p =
0.0027) and RD (r
2=0.86, p = 0.014). FA was not a significant
factor. Figure 2 showed the correlation between DTI parameters with 1 yr ASIA motor
score for HC and non-HC patients. Both non-HC and higher MD, AD or RD are indicative of higher ASIA score at 1 yr.
Furthermore in HC patients, significant correlation was seen where higher MD,
AD and RD were correlated with higher ASIA scores in HC patients.
Discussion
The variation in the DTI values within controls for different sections,
as well as altered DTI values in the SCI, are consistent with earlier findings
in acute traumatic c-spine injury
3,4. Reduced FA was mostly driven
by reduced AD and increased RD, which are indicative of axonal injury and
vasogenic edema, respectively. Both hemorrhagic vs. non-hemorrhagic contusion
and DTI are strong factors in patient outcome in our group of patients. Among all DTI measures, AD showed strongest effect in predicting
outcome, while not RD. As AD is a specific parameter for axonal injury, this
may indicate that axonal injury in the cord is the main factor affecting
patient recovery. Our study demonstrates
acute DTI measurements are a valuable biomarker in predicting patient outcome following
blunt cervical SCI.
Acknowledgements
The work is supported by US Air Force grant FA8650-12-2-6D03.
References
[1] Flanders, A.E., Spettell, C.M., Tartaglino, L.M., et al. "Forecasting motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury: value of MR imaging". Radiology 1996, 201, 649–655.
[2] Miyanji, F., Furlan, J.C., et al. "Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome—prospective study with 100 consecutive patients". Radiology. 2007; 243, 820–827.
[3] Cheran S, Shanmuganathan K, Zhuo J, et al. “Correlation of MR diffusion tensor imaging parameters with ASIA motor scores in hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic acute spinal cord injury.”, J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(9):1881-92.
[4]Shanmuganathan K, Gullapalli RP, Zhuo J, et al. “Diffusion tensor MR imaging in cervical spine trauma.” AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(4):655-9.