Molecular Effects of the Chemotherapeutic Drug Doxorubicin on Choline Phospholipid Metabolism of Breast Cancer Cells
Menglin Cheng1, Asif Rizwan1, Zaver M. Bhujwalla1,2, Lu Jiang1, and Kristine Glunde1,2

1The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

Synopsis

This study shows that the widely used chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin increases the 1H or 31P MRS detectable glycerophosphocholine (GPC) concentration, while decreasing the phosphocholine (PC) concentration in human MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines. This GPC increase and PC decrease was caused by doxorubicin-induced decreases in the expression of the GPC-phosphodiesterase GDPD6, choline kinase α, and phospholipase D1. GDPD6 silencing was able to counteract the doxorubicin-induced promotion of breast cancer cell migration, which can occur at low doxorubicin concentrations. GPC, PC, and PC/GPC may serve as non-invasive surrogate makers of therapeutic response in breast cancer patients undergoing doxorubicin chemotherapy.

Purpose

The MRS-detected total choline (tCho) signal is a promising non-invasive surrogate marker of chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients 1. However, the exact molecular mechanisms by which chemotherapeutic drugs affects the tCho signal, which consists of glycerophosphocholine (GPC), phosphocholine (PC), and free choline (Cho), are often unknown. Here we have used the widely used cancer chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin to treat estrogen-receptor positive MCF-7 and triple-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells to elucidate its molecular effects on choline phospholipid metabolism. We employed high-resolution (HR) 1H MRS to detect changes in cellular choline metabolite profiles, and quantitative RT-PCR and immunoblotting to assess corresponding changes in expression levels of choline-metabolizing enzymes.

Methods

Cells of the two breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 were treated with 5 μM doxorubicin, or DMSO vehicle as controls, for 24 hours or 48 hours. Metabolites were extracted using dual-phase extraction (methonal:chloroform:water=1:1:1). HR 1H MRS of the water-soluble extract fractions was performed on a Bruker 500 MR spectrometer. Choline containing metabolites were quantified from MR spectra using MestReNova software. RNA extracted from 5 μM doxorubicin or vehicle control treated breast cancer cells was reverse transcribed, and SYBR Green based quantitative PCR was used to detect changes in mRNA levels of phospholipase D1 (PLD1), phospholipase D2 (PLD2), choline kinase α (Chkα), glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase domain containing 5 (GDPD5) and 6 (GDPD6). PLD1 and Chkα changes in protein levels were detected by immunoblotting following treatment with 0.0 (vehicle control), 0.5, 1.5, or 5.0 μM of doxorubicin. Actin served as loading control. To assess the effects of silencing choline metabolic enzymes on cell migration, MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with 75 µM siRNA against PLD1, Chkα, GDPD6, or non-target siRNA using lipofectamine 2000, followed by transwell assay with or without 100 nM doxorubicin in the media, using 2% fetal bovine serium (FBS) as attractant.

Results

After 24 hours of doxorubicin treatment of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, tCho levels did not change. However, the GPC concentration significantly increased while the PC concentration decreased, thereby dramatically decreasing the PC/GPC ratio as compared to vehicle controls (Fig. 1A-B). This trend even furthered after 48h of doxorubicin treatment, leading to an equal or higher concentration of GPC than PC, dropping the PC/GPC ratio to around 1 (Fig. 1A,C). This was consistent in both breast cancer cell lines. Testing GDPD5 2 and GDPD6 3, two enzymes implicated in GPC cleavage, we detected that only GDPD6 mRNA was downregulated after doxorubicin treatment (Fig. 2A-B). Chkα, which phosphorylates free choline to PC and regulates cellular PC concentration in breast cancer, was decreased after doxorubicin treatment (Table 1). PLD1, which cleaves choline from phosphatidylcholine, was downregulated by doxorubicin, but not PLD2 (Table 1). Doxorubicin treatment of breast cancer cells resulted in a concentration-dependent decrease of PLD1 and Chkα protein levels, which started to occur at sub-lethal concentrations of 1.5 μM doxorubicin and furthered when the doxorubicin concentration was increased to 5 μM (Fig. 2). A low concentration of 100 nM doxorubicin increased cell migration as also reported previously 4, which was abolished by concomitant transient GDPD6 silencing, keeping cell migration down to comparable migration as with transient GDPD6 silencing alone (Fig. 3). Transient silencing of PLD1 by itself reduced migration, but was not able to prevent the doxorubicin-induced increase in migration (Fig. 3).

Discussion

This study demonstrates that while the tCho level may not change following anticancer treatment with a chemotherapeutic agent, the individual components within the tCho signal, such as GPC, PC, or Cho may change. An increase in GPC with a concomitant decrease in PC is a change towards a choline metabolite profile that is typical of nonmalignant breast cancer cells 5. This metabolic alteration was caused by doxorubicin-induced decreases in PLD1, Chkα, and GDPD6, which were concentration-dependent as shown for PLD1 and Chkα at the protein level. Our study exemplified that it is worthwhile developing MRS methods such as 31P MRS of the breast 6 that are able to detect GPC and PC individually for detecting the response to chemotherapy. The first line chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin was found to promote breast cancer cell migration at low concentration 4, which we showed can be counteracted by GDPD6 silencing.

Conclusions

The choline metabolite concentrations of GPC and PC and the PC/GPC ratio may serve as non-invasive surrogate makers of therapeutic response in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with doxorubicin. Targeting GDPD6 may be combined with doxorubicin treatment to minimize its adverse effects on cell migration.

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the Division of Cancer Imaging Research for their help and support.

References

1. Bolan PJ, Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the breast: current status. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2013. 21(3):625-39.

2. Cao MD, Dopkens M, Krishnamachary B, et al., Glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase domain containing 5 (GDPD5) expression correlates with malignant choline phospholipid metabolite profiles in human breast cancer. NMR Biomed, 2012. 25(9):1033-42.

3. Stewart JD, Marchan R, Lesjak MS, et al., Choline-releasing glycerophosphodiesterase EDI3 drives tumor cell migration and metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012. 109(21):8155-60.

4. Bandyopadhyay A, Wang L, Agyin J, et al., Doxorubicin in combination with a small TGFbeta inhibitor: a potential novel therapy for metastatic breast cancer in mouse models. PLoS One, 2010. 5(4):e10365.

5. Aboagye EO, Bhujwalla ZM, Malignant transformation alters membrane choline phospholipid metabolism of human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res, 1999. 59(1):80-4.

6. Wijnen JP, van der Kemp WJ, Luttje MP, Korteweg MA, Luijten PR, Klomp DW, Quantitative 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human breast at 7 T. Magn Reson Med, 2012. 68(2):339-48.

Figures

Figure 1: Doxorubicin (dox) treatment increases GPC and decreases PC in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. (A) Representative expanded 1H MR spectra and (B) quantification following 48h of doxorubicin treatment of breast cancer cells. Values are mean ± standard error. *, P≤0.05; **, P≤0.01. A two-tailed unpaired t-test was used for all comparisons.

Figure 2: Doxorubicin (Dox) treatment decreased (A) Chkα and (B) PLD1 protein expression in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in a concentration dependent manner.

Table 1: Changes in mRNA levels following doxorubicin treatment of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Results are based on three independent biological experiments. *Fold change compared to vehicle controls.

Figure 3: GDPD6, but not PLD1 or Chkα, knockdown abolishes doxorubicin-induced cell migration. (A) Quantification and (B) representative images of MDA-MB-231 cells that have migrated through the transwell. Values are mean ± standard error (n=3). #, P≤0.05; **, ##, &&, P<0.01; * compared to vehicle control without doxorubicin; # compared to non-target control without doxorubicin; &&, compared to non-target control with doxorubicin. A two-tailed unpaired t-test was used for all comparisons.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0843