James R Larkin1, Alex M Dickens2, Timothy D W Claridge3, Daniel C Anthony2, and Nicola R Sibson1
1CRUK and MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Secondary tumours, or metastases,
in the brain are currently detected at a late stage by
gadolinium-enhanced MRI. We used mouse models of brain metastases,
coupled with high resolution NMR of urine to identify characteristic
patterns of metabolites in tumour-bearing animals. A model with a
tumour cells implanted directly in the brain showed sensitive and
specific detection at day 5 with increasing separation at later time
points. Models injecting cells into the heart or venous circulation
give rise to differing systemic and central nervous system (CNS)
tumour burdens. Metabolite patterns allow identification of these
animals with a heavy CNS tumour burden.Purpose
Over
20% of cancer patients develop secondary brain tumours, or
metastases. Current gold-standard MRI diagnosis relies upon
gadolinium enhancement on a T1-weighted scan, indicative of a
permeable blood-brain barrier. This is a late-stage event and thus,
new methods enabling earlier diagnosis are urgently needed. We have
previously shown that it is possible to discriminate between
different inflammatory lesions in the CNS in rats
1, as well as
between different stages of multiple sclerosis in patients
2,
through NMR biofluid (blood/urine) metabolomics. We believe that this
ability is due, at least in part, to alterations in CNS metabolism,
which provoke a specific metabolic signature in the biofluids
studied. It is known that tumour metabolism differs markedly from
normal brain and that brain metabolism itself will be altered by
tumour presence. On the basis of the above, therefore, we
hypothesised that the presence of brain metastases could be detected,
in vivo,
through NMR analysis of biofluids.
Methods
Metastatic
mammary carcinoma cells (murine 4T1-GFP) were injected into BALB/c
mice, via intracerebral, intracardial or intravenous routes to induce
differing cerebral and systemic tumour burdens. Urine was collected
at days 0 and 10 from all animals, and at days 5, 21 and 35 in
animals injected intracerebrally. Samples from naïve, day 0 and
vehicle-injected mice served as combined control cohorts.
1H-NMR
NOESY pre-saturation spectra were acquired for each sample using a
Bruker Avance III spectrometer equipped with a
1H TCI cryoprobe.
Two-dimensional COSY
1H-NMR
spectra were acquired from a single sample within each group to
assist with metabolite identification. Statistical pattern
recognition and modelling was applied to identify spectral
differences and to identify commonalities indicative of brain
metastasis burden. A robust method using unknown samples was used to
validate model predictions. Additional models using alternate cell
lines were used for further validation (B16F10 murine melanoma in BL6
mice and MDA231BR-GFP human breast carcinoma in SCID mice).
Results
Significant
differences in 1H
NMR spectra were found between control cohorts and animals with
tumour burdens at all timepoints for the intracerebral 4T1-GFP
metastasis model (q2
= 0.54, 0.58, 0.81 and 0.80 for days 5, 10, 21 and 35, shown in Fig.
1A, B, C and D respectively; q2
> 0.4 considered significant).
Models
became stronger, with higher sensitivity and specificity, as the
timecourse progressed indicating a more severe tumour burden.
Sensitivity and specificity for predicting a blinded testing set were
0.89 and 0.82, respectively, at day 5, but both rose to 1.00 at day
35. Key metabolites driving the separations were identified and
quantified relative to control (Fig. 2).
Significant
separations were also found between control and day 10 animals for
all 4T1-GFP injected mice irrespective of route (q
2
= 0.70, 0.63 and 0.78 for intracerebral, intracardiac and intravenous
routes, respectively). The metabolites underpinning separations in
each case differed indicating differentiation between systemic and
CNS metastatic burden, but with common patterns that suggest a
“fingerprint” for brain metastasis.
Discussion
Our
data indicate that animals with brain metastases can be identified
using NMR spectra of urinary metabolic profiles, and differentiated
from animals with a predominantly systemic metastasis burden. These
models were highly sensitive and specific at predicting blinded
testing sets. This approach may identify a set of biomarkers for the
diagnosis of brain metastasis earlier than is currently possible, and
may provide insight into metabolic disruption in brain metastasis.
Conclusions
Urine
metabolomics based upon
1H-NMR
spectroscopy is sensitive and specific for both following tumour
progression and distinguishing animals with heavy brain burdens of
tumours relative to heavy systemic burdens.
Acknowledgements
This study was
supported
by Cancer Research UK (grant number C5255/A15935 to NRS); and the
Medical Research Council, UK (Capacity Building Studentship to AMD).References
(1)
Griffin et al.
(2004) FEBS Letters 568
49-54; (2) Dickens and Larkin et
al. (2014) Neurology
83
1492-99