NMR metabolomics of biofluids for early diagnosis of brain metastasis
James R Larkin1, Alex M Dickens2, Timothy D W Claridge3, Daniel C Anthony2, and Nicola R Sibson1

1CRUK and MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Synopsis

Secondary tumours, or metastases, in the brain are currently detected at a late stage by gadolinium-enhanced MRI. We used mouse models of brain metastases, coupled with high resolution NMR of urine to identify characteristic patterns of metabolites in tumour-bearing animals. A model with a tumour cells implanted directly in the brain showed sensitive and specific detection at day 5 with increasing separation at later time points. Models injecting cells into the heart or venous circulation give rise to differing systemic and central nervous system (CNS) tumour burdens. Metabolite patterns allow identification of these animals with a heavy CNS tumour burden.

Purpose

Over 20% of cancer patients develop secondary brain tumours, or metastases. Current gold-standard MRI diagnosis relies upon gadolinium enhancement on a T1-weighted scan, indicative of a permeable blood-brain barrier. This is a late-stage event and thus, new methods enabling earlier diagnosis are urgently needed. We have previously shown that it is possible to discriminate between different inflammatory lesions in the CNS in rats1, as well as between different stages of multiple sclerosis in patients2, through NMR biofluid (blood/urine) metabolomics. We believe that this ability is due, at least in part, to alterations in CNS metabolism, which provoke a specific metabolic signature in the biofluids studied. It is known that tumour metabolism differs markedly from normal brain and that brain metabolism itself will be altered by tumour presence. On the basis of the above, therefore, we hypothesised that the presence of brain metastases could be detected, in vivo, through NMR analysis of biofluids.

Methods

Metastatic mammary carcinoma cells (murine 4T1-GFP) were injected into BALB/c mice, via intracerebral, intracardial or intravenous routes to induce differing cerebral and systemic tumour burdens. Urine was collected at days 0 and 10 from all animals, and at days 5, 21 and 35 in animals injected intracerebrally. Samples from naïve, day 0 and vehicle-injected mice served as combined control cohorts. 1H-NMR NOESY pre-saturation spectra were acquired for each sample using a Bruker Avance III spectrometer equipped with a 1H TCI cryoprobe. Two-dimensional COSY 1H-NMR spectra were acquired from a single sample within each group to assist with metabolite identification. Statistical pattern recognition and modelling was applied to identify spectral differences and to identify commonalities indicative of brain metastasis burden. A robust method using unknown samples was used to validate model predictions. Additional models using alternate cell lines were used for further validation (B16F10 murine melanoma in BL6 mice and MDA231BR-GFP human breast carcinoma in SCID mice).

Results

Significant differences in 1H NMR spectra were found between control cohorts and animals with tumour burdens at all timepoints for the intracerebral 4T1-GFP metastasis model (q2 = 0.54, 0.58, 0.81 and 0.80 for days 5, 10, 21 and 35, shown in Fig. 1A, B, C and D respectively; q2 > 0.4 considered significant).

Models became stronger, with higher sensitivity and specificity, as the timecourse progressed indicating a more severe tumour burden. Sensitivity and specificity for predicting a blinded testing set were 0.89 and 0.82, respectively, at day 5, but both rose to 1.00 at day 35. Key metabolites driving the separations were identified and quantified relative to control (Fig. 2).

Significant separations were also found between control and day 10 animals for all 4T1-GFP injected mice irrespective of route (q2 = 0.70, 0.63 and 0.78 for intracerebral, intracardiac and intravenous routes, respectively). The metabolites underpinning separations in each case differed indicating differentiation between systemic and CNS metastatic burden, but with common patterns that suggest a “fingerprint” for brain metastasis.

Discussion

Our data indicate that animals with brain metastases can be identified using NMR spectra of urinary metabolic profiles, and differentiated from animals with a predominantly systemic metastasis burden. These models were highly sensitive and specific at predicting blinded testing sets. This approach may identify a set of biomarkers for the diagnosis of brain metastasis earlier than is currently possible, and may provide insight into metabolic disruption in brain metastasis.

Conclusions

Urine metabolomics based upon 1H-NMR spectroscopy is sensitive and specific for both following tumour progression and distinguishing animals with heavy brain burdens of tumours relative to heavy systemic burdens.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Cancer Research UK (grant number C5255/A15935 to NRS); and the Medical Research Council, UK (Capacity Building Studentship to AMD).

References

(1) Griffin et al. (2004) FEBS Letters 568 49-54; (2) Dickens and Larkin et al. (2014) Neurology 83 1492-99

Figures

Scores scatter plots showing stronger separation as tumours grow

Metabolite abundance over a 4T1-GFP metastasis model timecourse



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0838