Study of Spatial Function in the Human Placenta with Diffusion Weighted Imaging
Edward Sutherland 1, Luís F Gonçalves1,2,3, and Yuxiang Zhou1,3

1William Beaumont Hospital School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, United States, 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, United States, 3Diagnostic Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, United States

Synopsis

Magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) has been widely used to quantitatively measure the random motion of water molecules within a voxel of tissue and represents this information in the form of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. As the ADC map has been shown to be influenced by circulatory motion and perfusion at low b-values, we hypothesize that ADC values obtained from the placenta may vary as a function of distance to the umbilical cord insertion. In this retrospective study, 78 healthy placentas were evaluated by MR-DWI. We conclude that ADC values of placental tissues obtained at high b-values do not vary in normal human placentas as a function of distance to umbilical cord insertion.

Purpose

The ADC map derived from MR DWI imaging can quantify molecular water diffusion throughout fetal development and may be able to identify placental pathology, such as infarct, when it exists.1 The purpose of this research is to establish normal ADC values for the healthy placenta and investigate the relationship between placental ADC values and distance from umbilical cord insertion.

Method

This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. 78 normal singleton pregnancies between 20 and 41 weeks gestational age (mean 27.5, range 19.9-37.3, SD of 5.1) were included in the study. MR DWI images were acquired on a 1.5 Tesla system (Siemens Sonata, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, PA). A 4-channel body array coil was used for signal reception. The optimized DWI protocol consists of a single-shot, spin-echo echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence with TR/TE of 3100/97 ms; in plane resolution of 1.9 x1.9 mm2, square field of view (FOV) of 240 mm; 128 × 128 matrix, and 5-mm contiguous slices with three excitations. Three orthogonal gradients were applied with a b value of 1,000 s/mm2. HASTE and TRUE-FISP sequences were also used to acquire anatomic images of the placenta without breath hold. ADC maps were created using assigned b-values. The average ADC (ADC2D) of the entire cross section of the placenta at the level of the umbilical cord insertion was measured in the plane that provided the maximum cross-sectional area. Additional ROIs were defined in the same plane on the ADC maps at distances of 1.5 cm (ADC1.5), 3 cm (ADC3), 6 cm (ADC6), and 9 cm (ADC9) from the point of the umbilical cord insertion (Figure 1). Each ROI was 2 cm2. Inter- and intra-examiner repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. The ADC values of individual ROIs vs. the distance from the insertion of the umbilical cord were plotted individually for each placenta to look for a correlation between the ADC values and the distance from the insertion of the umbilical cord. The average ADC of the cross section of the placenta, and these from the ROIs at 1.5 cm, 3.0 cm, and 6.0 cm for all placentas were compared using a standard ANOVA test. p<0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

ADC values decreased slightly as a function of gestational age (GA) (ADC (x10-5mm2/s) = 205.9385-0.9189 x GA, SD = 27.692, R2 = 0.03) (Figure 2). There was no statistically significant difference in mean ADC values between samples taken from the entire cross-section of the placenta or single 2 cm2 samples at 1.5, 3, or 6 cm from the umbilical cord insertion shown in Figure 3 (ANOVA, F=0.18, p= 0.91). Intra- and interobserver ICC for measurements obtained from the entire cross-section of the placenta were 0.97 and 0.963, respectively. Inter- and intraobserver limits of agreement on Bland-Altman plots were -17.6 to 24.7 x10-5 mm2/s) and -21.9 to 20.3 x10-5 mm2/s, respectively.

Discussion

Several previous DWI studies have suggested that DWI can play an important role for early detection of placental based disorders. Our results show the statistical similarity between the average ADC values of the cross-section of the placenta and smaller ROIs taken at varying distance from the insertion of the umbilindicates that the ADC throughout the placenta is homogeneous at high b-values (1,000 mm2/s). A previous study suggests that DWI may be sensitive to a variety of placental pathology, including hemorrhage, thrombi, ischemia, chorioamnionitis, and fibrin deposition.2 To our knowledge, this is the first MRI study of the placenta to evaluate the spatial function using MRI diffusion weighted imaging.

Conclusion

ADC values of a healthy placenta decrease slightly with gestational age. The lack of heterogeneity from samples obtained from different regions of the placenta as well as good intra- and interobserver repeatability and reproducibility suggests that diffusion quantitation can be confidently performed throughout the placenta.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Manganaro L, Fierro F, Tomei A, La Barbera L, Savelli S, Sollazzo P, Sergi ME, Vinci V, Ballesio L, Marini M. MRI and DWI: feasibility of DWI and ADC maps in the evaluation of placental changes during gestation. Prenat Diagn. 2010 Dec;30 (12-13):1178-84.

2. Linduska N, Dekan S, Messerschmidt A, Kasprian G, Brugger PC, Chalubinski K, Weber M, Prayer D. Placental pathologies in fetal MRI with pathohistological correlation. Placenta. 2009 Jun;30(6):555-9.

Figures

Figure 1: DWI image showing the location of ROIs. The arrow points to the insertion of the umbilical cord. The entire cross-section of the placenta (ADC2D) is outlined. Three ROIs are selected at distance of 1.5cm (ADC1.5), 3cm (ADC3), and 6 cm (ADC6) from the insertion of the umbilical cord.

Figure 2: ADC values derived from MRI DWI as a function of gestational age.

Figure 3: Average ADC values at 1.5 cm, 3 cm, 6 cm, and 9 cm with standard deviations. (ANOVA: F=1.08, p=0.91).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0833