MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia for sensitization of radiation and chemotherapy for recurrent rectal cancer: First phase I clinical trial results.
William Chu1, Robert Staruch2, Samuel Pichardo3,4, Yuexi Huang5, Charles Mougenot6, Matti Tillander7, Max O. Köhler7, Mika Ylihautala7, Merrylee McGuffin1, Gregory Czarnota1, and Kullervo Hynynen5

1Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Philips Research, Cambridge, MA, United States, 3Thunder Bay Regional Research Institute, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, 4Electrical Engineering, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, 5Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Philips Healthcare, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Philips Healthcare, Vantaa, Finland

Synopsis

We present the first results of a Phase I trial that includes delivery of mild hyperthermia using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) combined with radiation and chemotherapy in the treatment of locally recurrentrectal cancer. MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia was delivered in three sessions (day 1, 8 and 15) during a 17-day treatment protocol (total dose 30.6 Gy combined with fluropyrimidine-based chemotherapy). MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia was successfully delivered and the procedure was well tolerated by the patient. No adverse effects have been reported 3 months after the treatment.

Purpose

Recurrent rectal cancer occurs in 5-15% of patients after combined modality therapy. Local recurrences (LR) may be isolated, or occur with metastatic disease1. Patients with LR following radiotherapy have severe morbidity and a poor quality of life associated with pain, bleeding and obstructive symptoms2. Because of its potential to sensitize tumors to radiation and chemotherapy, hyperthermia may improve outcomes for patients with LR. For this purpose, target tissue must be heated in the range of 40 to 43°C over several minutes. In past studies the lack of adequate image guidance resulted in poor control of the energy deposition required to achieve thermal enhancement3. MR-HIFU uses MR temperature measurements acquired every 1-5 seconds in a feedback control loop to achieve a desired therapeutic outcome. Adapting MR-HIFU for mild heating over an extended period increases the requirements for precision and stability of temperature monitoring and control. In this study, we present the preliminary clinical experience on the use of MR-HIFU to deliver mild hyperthermia treatment in the context of recurrent rectal cancer.

Methods

Figure 1 presents the clinical trial design for this Phase I study, which was approved by the Research Ethics Board of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. In summary, the MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia is added to the standard care of LR performed at our cancer centre. Patients with LR receive fractionated radiation treatment over 17 days (1.8 Gy/day) for a total of 30.6 Gy with concurrent fluropyrimyidine-based chemotherapy. The patient receives three sessions of MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia on days 1, 8 and 15. Each hyperthermia session consists of heating the LR with MR-HIFU with a target temperature and treatment time of 42°C for 30 minutes. MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia was delivered using the Sonalleve MR-HIFU system and an Achieva 3T MRI (Philips Healthcare). Investigational Testing Authorization was granted by Health Canada to use a modified version of the treatment software adapted for hyperthermia. An electronically steered treatment cell with a diameter of 18 mm was used to focus the ultrasound beam and cover the target tissue.

Results

Patient was positioned in decubitus position on the treatment table and the three sessions of the MR-HIFU hyperthermia procedure were well tolerated. Figure 1 shows examples of treatment T1- and T2-weighted planning images for the treatment on day 15. Rectal filling with ultrasound gel was applied to reduce bowel motion. The LR was accessible for targeting with MR-HIFU through the sciatic foramen. The target zone was located 8 cm from the skin surface. As precaution, for the very first treatment session the sonication time and target temperature were set conservatively. Figures 2, 3, and 4, shows the observed mean temperature over time in the target zone for the sessions 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The achieved treatment time on session 1 (day 1) was 16 min with an average temperature of 39.8 ± 0.8°C. On session 2 (day 8), a complete 30 min delivery was completed with an average temperature of 39.8 ± 0.8°C. On session 3 (day 15), the treatment was split in 3 smaller hyperthermia deliveries, achieving a total treatment time of 41 min and an average temperature of 40.4 ± 1.3°C, 41.2 ± 0.8°C and 39.9 ± 0.8°C on each of three deliveries. No presence of a thermal lesion was observed in post-treatment T2-weighted imaging done in each session.

Discussion

As the team gained experience, subsequent sessions achieved better delivery of mild hyperthermia. A critical aspect to the success of the procedure was the constant communication with the patient to inquire about any abnormal or painful sensation as the was in close proximity to the sciatic nerve. Three months after the procedure, patient reports no sign of any complication associated to the treatment. A current limitation is the relative lack of maximal depth of LR attainable with the current setup, which is 8 cm.

Conclusions

In this study we show the first Phase I clinical trial results of a successful mild hyperthermia delivery using MR-HIFU in the context of treating a local recurrence of rectal cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first reported use of MR–guided focused ultrasound to deliver mild hyperthermia in a patient setting.

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge financial support from Canadian Cancer Society and Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario. RMS, CM, MT, MOK, and MY are employees of Philips.

References

1. Enríquez-Navascués et al. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1674–84. doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i13.1674.

2. Guren MG, et al. Radiother Oncol 2014;113:151–7. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.021.

3. Kakehi M, et al. Int J Hyperthermia 1990;6:719–40.

Figures

Figure 1. Treatment planning images on day 15. Beam path through sciatic foramen is seen on T1-weighted images. Tumour is clearly observable on T2-weighted planning images. Tumour is delineated in T2-weighted images. Similar planning images were observed on days 1 and 8.

Figure 2. Mean (orange), T90 (blue) and T10 (red) temperature on MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia treatment done on day 1. Acoustic power was set to 40W and sonication frequency to 1.2 MHz.

Figure 3. Mean (orange), T90 (blue) and T10 (red) temperature on MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia treatment done on day 8. Acoustic power was set to 60W and sonication frequency to 1.0 MHz.

Figure 4. Mean (orange), T90 (blue) and T10 (red) temperature on MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia treatment done on day 15. Three hyperthermia sonications were performed on day 15. Acoustic power and frequency was set to 80W (top), 60W (middle) and 60 W (bottom). Frequency was set to 1.0 MHz.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0824