Elena Kaye1, Sebastien Monette2, Majid Maybody3, Stephen B Solomon3, and Amitabh Gulati4
1Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 2Comparative Pathology, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, United States, 3Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 4Anesthesiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
The main goals of this preclinical study were to determine whether
direct MRgFUS ablation of the lumbar MB nerve leads to functional changes and
to study the extent of the thermal damage to the targeted and adjacent tissues,
including neurologic structures. We found that direct FUS ablation of the
lumbar MBN achieves thermal necrosis of the targeted nerve with minimal thermal
damage of the adjacent bone and muscle tissue. The extent of the cellular
changes in bone is limited to a few millimeters with no changes in the spinal
cord, confirming the protective effects of spine bone rapidly
attenuating the ultrasound. No functional changes were observed.Introduction
Up to 40% of Chronic Low Back Pain cases involve facet joints
1 which may be denervated
by subcutaneous lumbar medial branch nerve (MBN) radiofrequency ablation.
In a recent clinical study of MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) ablation
of the facet joint
2, no improvement in
pain scores was reported by 40% of the patients, potentially due to incomplete
destruction of all small nerves innervating the joint. Technical feasibility
for using MRgFUS to target the MBN before it branches into small nerves of the facet
joint was recently demonstrated in an acute
swine model
3. While feasible,
currently, direct FUS ablation of spine is not clinically practiced due to
potential risk of damaging spinal cord and lumbar nerve roots.
The main goals
of this project were to determine whether direct MRgFUS ablation of the lumbar
MB nerve leads to functional changes and to study the extent of the thermal
damage to the targeted and adjacent tissues, including neurological structures. Methods
Three Yorkshire swine underwent
unilateral ablation
of the MB nerves using ExAblate 2000 FUS system and a GE 3 T MRI scanner
after institutional animal care and use committee protocol approval. The intubated animals were positioned into a tilted-supine position to provide access to the space between the transverse (TP) and articular processes
(AP)(Fig 1a).
Two to four nerves were ablated in each animal using
3
- 9 sonications per nerve. Ultrasound frequency was 1.35 MHz and acoustic
energy was 500 - 710 J. Thermal dose was calculated by the treatment
planning software.
Contrast-enhanced (CE) imaging was performed
immediately after the treatment using MRI and 48-hours post-treatment - using
computerized tomography (CT). The animals were maintained on preventative pain
medications for 48 hours following the treatment.
Assessment of pain, behavior,
ambulation and gait was performed twice a day. After euthanasia, lumbar spine was fixed in formalin and decalcified. Decalcified sample was sectioned transversely into 5 mm thick
slices, analyzed for gross pathology and processed routinely for histology,
using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.
Results
All targeted nerves received lethal thermal dose (Fig 1b) in
a location corresponding to non-perfused region visible between the transverse
and articular processes on CE-MRI (Fig 1c,d) and CE-CT images (Fig 2), with
tissue near the nerve root, superior to the ablation, appearing normal (Fig 2).
No changes in bone contrast uptake were visible on CT. On CE-MRI bone surface near ablation appeared slightly more hypo-intense than bone of the untreated side (Fig 1c,
arrowhead).
No changes in animal
behavior and functions were observed and no signs of superficial or deep
pain were detected. There was no difference in animals’ ambulation, gait
or pain between the treated and untreated sides. On gross pathology (Fig 2),
the targeted region exhibited changes consistent with thermal damage and
hemorrhage was observed as brown rim surrounding the ablation region in muscle
and penetrating 2-5 mm into the bone. The gross appearance of the nerve root
slices was normal. Histological analysis confirmed that
changes in bone tissue
did not extend deep towards the spinal canal leaving 5 to 7 mm of intact bone
between the ablation and the spinal canal (Fig 3). Compared to a normal nerve
(Fig 4a), treated nerve exhibited stromal hyalinization and nuclear pyknosis (Fig
4b) consistent with coagulative necrosis. The vessels near the ablated nerve
appeared necrotic with signs of thrombosis. Muscle adjacent to the nerve was necrotic,
with macrophages infiltrating the periphery of the ablation zone (inflammatory
reaction). Compared to normal bone tissue (Fig 4c), the bone adjacent to the
MBN exhibited coagulative necrosis: shrinkage, cytoplasmic hypereosinophilia
and nuclear pyknosis of osteoblasts and hematopoietic cells, necrotic vessels,
and hemorrhage. Spinal cord showed no histological
changes. The nerve root sampled immediately above the ablation site (Fig 5)
appeared normal.
Discussion
Direct FUS targeting of the
lumbar MBN achieves thermal necrosis of the nerve with minimal necrosis
of the adjacent bone and muscle tissue. Visualization of spine bone necrosis is challenging on MRI due to short relaxation time of the cortical bone. The extent of bone necrosis is limited to the superficial layer of the bone, with no changes in the spinal cord,
confirming the protective effect of spine bone acoustic attenuation 4. No changes in the
nerve roots demonstrate that small size of
the individual FUS lesions makes FUS ideally-suited for neurological applications requiring minimal
ablation “foot-print” to spare adjacent critical structures.
Conclusion
The functional and histological outcomes of this study provide preliminary evidence of the safety of direct MRgFUS ablation of the MBN, potentially broadening the bone MRgFUS applications to spine malignancies.
Acknowledgements
We thank Jacob Chen for technical support with MRgFUS system and Dr. Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli for support with CT imaging session.References
1. L. Manchikanti, V. Singh, V.
Pampati et al., Evaluation of the relative
contributions of various structures in chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 4 (4), 308-316 (2001).
2. E. Weeks,
M. Platt and W. Gedroyc,
MRI-guided focused
ultrasound (MRgFUS) to treat facet joint osteoarthritis low back pain—case
series of an innovative new technique. Eur Radiol 22
(12), 2822-2835 (2012).
3. E. Kaye, A.
Gulati, S. Monette et al.,
Evaluating
MRgHIFU Ablation of the Lumbar Medial Branch Nerve in an Acute Swine Model.
15th International
Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound, Utrecht, 2015.
4. S. J. Scott, V. Salgaonkar, P. Prakash, E. C. Burdette
and C. J. Diederich, Interstitial ultrasound ablation of vertebral and paraspinal tumours: parametric and patient-specific simulations. International Journal of Hyperthermia 30 (4), 228-244 (2014).