Acceleration of 3D UTE Imaging to Quantify Temperature-Dependent T1 Changes in Cortical Bone
Misung Han1, Wenwen Jiang2, Roland Krug1, Peder Larson1,2, and Viola Rieke1

1Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2Joint Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, San Francisco/Berkeley, San Francisco, CA, United States

Synopsis

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a promising, noninvasive technique to ablate bone tumors and palliate painful bone metastases. During HIFU treatment, temperature mapping is desirable for proper heat deposition to targeted bone regions. Even though conventional PRF-based thermometry cannot be applied for cortical bone due to its short T2 relaxation time, it was demonstrated using 3D UTE imaging can be used to measure T1 changes due to heating. In this work, we accelerated 3D UTE imaging by combining parallel imaging and compressed sensing and compared calculated T1 changes due to heating with those from fully sampled data.

Purpose

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a promising, noninvasive technique to ablate bone tumors and palliate painful bone metastases.1,2 During HIFU treatment, temperature mapping is desirable for proper heat deposition to targeted bone regions. However, conventional PRF-based thermometry cannot be applied for cortical bone due to its short T2 relaxation time. Recently, a linear increase in cortical bone T1 with temperature was demonstrated using 3D UTE imaging combined with a variable flip angle method.3 However, this previously used UTE T1 mapping method with 3D radial acquisitions requires a long scan time. In this work, we evaluated acceleration of this technique by combining parallel imaging and compressed sensing to depict T1 changes due to heating with ultrasound.

Methods

An ex vivo study was performed with a diaphysis segment of bovine femur on a Discovery MR 750w 3T scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) using an eight-channel phased-array wrist coil (Invivo, Gainesville, FL). A 7.7 MHz catheter-cooled interstitial ultrasound applicator with two-sectored cylindrical transducers4 was inserted into the fatty yellow bone marrow. Heating of cortical bone was conducted by delivering high intensity ultrasound energy with a 180° directional heating pattern towards the bone. Before heating began, 3D UTE imaging combining non-selective excitation and 3D radial acquisitions (no undersampling) was conducted using a 11 ms TR, 175 μs TE (center of the RF to the start of acquisition), 1 x 1 x 1.5 mm3 spatial resolution, 9 x 9 x 9.6 cm3 FOV, and RF spoiling. Data acquisition started with the rising slope of the readout gradient (ramp sampling), and 256 samples were acquired for each spoke with a sampling interval of 4 μs. Imaging with two flip angles of 8° and 44° (each with 4 min scan time) was conducted to calculate T1 using a variable flip angle scheme.5 Temperature was assumed to reach steady state at 12 min after heating began, and UTE imaging with the two flip angles was performed again.

The acquired data was retrospectively undersampled by a factor of 8. Reconstruction was performed using an autocalibrated parallel imaging method, ESPIRiT, which can incorporate compressed sensing as well.6 The central, fully-sampled, k-space data was used for coil calibration. The l1 norm of the wavelet coefficients was added as a sparsity regularization7 during iterative reconstruction of the images (l1-ESPIRiT). T1 maps were calculated using reconstructed images from fully-sampled data by 3D gridding and those from undersampled data by 3D gridding and l1-ESPiRIT, before and after heating, respectively. The l1-ESPiRIT and gridding reconstructions were performed with Berkeley Advanced Reconstruction Toolbox.8

Results

Figure 1a-c shows reconstructed UTE images applying the 44° flip angle before heating from full k-space data and from undersampled data. We can see significant reduction of streak artifacts and noise by l1-ESPIRiT reconstruction on undersampled data. Figure 2 demonstrate Maps of T1 changes between before and after heating, measured using the three different sets of reconstructed UTE images. T1 increase can be seen in the heated region of cortical bone. L1-ESPIRiT reconstruction of the undersampled data provided T1 values similar to those from fully-sampled data.

Discussion

Acceleration techniques such as parallel imaging and compressed sensing are well suited for 3D radial acquisitions due to their autocalibration capability from a central over-sampled k-space data and incoherent aliasing artifact patterns in the image domain. Combination with compressed sensing can allow for a higher acceleration factor than just using parallel imaging itself due to its denoising effects. In this work, we accelerated UTE imaging by a factor of 8 by using l1-ESPIRiT reconstruction, which provided T1 quantification similar to that from fully-sampled data. Further acceleration might be achievable by incorporating similarity between two flip angle images or those over the temporal domain. These acceleration methods might allow for applying 3D T1 mapping in cortical bone to monitor temperature during bone HIFU treatment.

Conclusion

We have shown that l1-ESPIRiT can accelerate 3D UTE imaging with a high acceleration factor without significant artifacts, and allows for measuring T1 changes due to heating similar to those from fully-sampled data.

Acknowledgements

Supported by NIH R00HL097030 and GE Healthcare.

References

1. Catane R, Beck A, Inbar Y, et al. MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for the palliation of pain in patients with bone metastases- preliminary clinical experience. Ann Oncol 2007;18:163–167.

2. Li C, Zhang W, Fan W, et al. Noninvasive treatment of malignant bone tumors using high-intensity focused ultrasound. Cancer 2010;116:3934–3942.

3. Han M, Rieke V, Scott SJ, et al. Quantifying temperature-dependent T1 changes in cortical bone using ultrashort echo-time MRI. Magn Reson Med 2015 (early view).

4. Diederich CJ, Nau WH, Stauffer PR. Ultrasound applicators for interstitial thermal coagulation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1999;46:1218–1228.

5. Fram EK, Herfkens RJ, Johnson GA, et al. Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1987;5:201–208.

6. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy, et al. ESPIRiT—an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 2014;71: 990–1001.

7. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182–1195.

8. BART: 10.5281/zenodo.31907.

Figures

Figure 1. (a-c) Reconstructed UTE images at a flip angle of 44° before heating, from fully sampled data (gridding) and from undersampled data by using gridding and l1-ESPIRiT reconstruction. Improved image quality can be seen by using l1-ESPIRiT reconstruction on undersampled data.

Figure 2. Maps of T1 changes (a-c: axial reformat, d-f: coronal reformat) between before and after heating, calculated from the three different sets of UTE images. The slice locations are denoted in pink dashed line. L1-ESPIRiT reconstruction allows for calculating T1 values similar to those from fully-sampled data.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0821