Tianyou Xu1, Way Cherng Chen2, Michiel Kleinnijenhuis1, Sean Foxley1, and Karla L Miller1
1University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Singapore Bioimaging Consortium, Singapore, Singapore
Synopsis
Biophysical modeling of axons has conventionally
assumed cylindrical geometries. In reality, axons vary in shape. Models
consisting of circles benefit from simplicity, however the consequences of this
assumption have not been studied. In this work, simulations incorporating
realistic myelin shape derived from electron microscopy are employed to model
white matter demyelination. Simulations are compared to a cohort of mice with
varying levels of demyelination. Predictions from models that incorporate realistic
myelin shape are in better agreement with experimental results in a mouse model
of demyelination than those from circular models.Purpose
To
consider the role that axonal shape has on susceptibility-weighted imaging in white
matter (WM), with application to demyelination.
Introduction
Recent work has described the magnetic
susceptibility of myelin as a significant contributor to gradient echo signal.
1-6 Increasingly
sophisticated biophysical models are employed to explain these signal properties,
including effects like susceptibility anisotropy.
5 This work
investigates the effect of myelin shape on the modeling of demyelination in WM.
First, a structural template of myelin is constructed from electron microscopy
(EM) data of mouse WM. Next, simulations of the MR signal magnitude/phase are
generated from this realistic template and compared to that of conventional
models using circles. Finally, predictions of these two models are evaluated
against experimental cuprizone mouse data, an animal model of demyelination.
Signal Simulations
Magnetic field perturbations induced by densely
packed axons with arbitrary geometries were modeled using the tensor
formulation in the Fourier domain.
7 These calculated field maps were used to simulate MR
signal evolution in three compartments: extra-axonal, intra-axonal and myelin.
4,6
Relevant parameters for the compartments (proton density, T
2, magnetic susceptibilities) were based on literature
values at 7T, Table 1.
5,6,7 Simulations considered both circular axons and more
realistic geometries. For the latter, 2D EM data on mouse WM was acquired at
7.16nm resolution and hand-segmented. Packing properties between the EM and
circle models are matched: both have a fiber density of 63%, the same Gamma
distribution of axon sizes, myelin content and compartmental
properties (Figure 1). Note that this rather low fiber density represents only myelinated
axons. Demyelination is modeled for both geometries by gradually thinning the
myelin structure, producing a range of g-ratios, from 0.71 (normal) to 0.98 (no
myelin).
Experimental Methods
Simulations were compared to experimental data
acquire in a mouse model of demyelination. Nine mice were fed 0.2% cuprizone
diet
ad libitum for different durations ranging from 0-42 days
to induce varying degrees of demyelination. Images were acquired
ex vivo on a 7T animal scanner using a
multiple echo gradient echo sequence with TEs=3,7,11...55ms (TR=1.5s, $$$70^\circ$$$flip,
80x80x300$$$\mu m$$$, 3 axial slices, 10 averages). Brains were scanned such that the
corpus callosum (CC) was orthogonal to the static field, which is matched in
simulation. Background field in phase images were removed using a ‘projection-onto-dipole-fields’
approach.
8Simulation Results
The simulated effect of demyelination on signal
magnitude and phase is shown in Figure 3: circle model (top: A-B) and EM-based model (bottom: C-D). Each curve represents a different g-ratio, varying from
0.71 to 0.98. Both models predict amplified signal decay and phase evolution
with increased myelination. At a given echo time, the circular model predicts
slightly greater signal decay and much greater phase evolution than is
predicted by the EM-based model. Given that these simulations were otherwise
matched, their differences suggest that myelin geometry has a significant
impact on both signal magnitude and phase across a range of demyelination
stages.
Experimental Results
Demyelination was confirmed with Luxol fast
blue histological stains (not shown). These stains are not sufficiently
quantitative to establish whether duration on the diet was monotonically
related to myelination, however there were clear differences in stain intensity
between mice with long versus short-duration diets. Averaged signal magnitude
and phase from an ROI in the CC (Figure 2) are plotted across the nine mice in
Figure 4, color-coded by their cuprizone diet duration thereby presumed level
of demyelination. There is a clear trend for faster signal decay and greater
phase accumulation in mice undergone short diet durations (and therefore more
myelin). At TE=55ms, the signal magnitude has attenuated to ~0.15–0.35 and the
signal phase varies from ~-0.9-0 radians. These ranges are in good agreement with
the predictions from the EM model (Figure 3), while signal predictions from the
circular model are larger.
Discussion
Results in this work suggest that myelin
geometry has a significant effect on the susceptibility-weighted signal. For
the simulation parameters used here (based on literature), EM-driven geometries
were more consistent with experimental data than circular geometries. While
EM-based geometries are unlikely to represent a sufficiently generalizable
framework for signal modeling, these results do have several important
implications for interpreting these MR signals. First, literature estimates of these
properties have generally been based on fitting a biophysical model to GRE-signals; our results suggest that assumption of circular geometries would bias
susceptibility estimates. Conversely, even if the susceptibility values for
myelin are known, circular models would led to consistent overestimations of
myelin content since they produce larger magnitude and phase changes than
realistic geometries. Sensitivity of the GRE-signal to axonal geometry therefore
can be expected to bias estimates of microstructural properties from these
signals.
Acknowledgements
University of Oxford’s Clarendon Fund Graduate Scholarship, the Sloane Robinson Foundation Scholarship, and the
Wellcome Trust.
References
(1) Sukstanskii et al.
MRM 2014 (2) Wharton et al. MRM 2014
(3) Lee et al. PNAS 2010 (4) Sati et al. Neuroimage 2013 (5) Wharton et al. PNAS 2012 (6) Chen et al. Neuroimage 2013 (7) Liu C. MRM 2010 (8) Liu T. NMR Biomed 2011