Characterization of Myocardial Fiber Orientation to Assess Therapeutic Exosomes from Cardiosphere-derived Cells (CDCs) in Myocardial Infarcted Porcine with In Vivo Diffusion-Tensor CMR on a Clinical Scanner
Christopher Nguyen1, James Dawkins2, Xiaoming Bi3, Debiao Li1,4, and Eduardo Marban2

1Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3Siemens Healthcare, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 4Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States

Synopsis

Diffusion-Tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DT-CMR) is capable of mapping myocardial fiber orientation. In myocardial infarction (MI) murine models, DT-CMR can identify the effects of stem cell therapy on myocardial fiber orientations. The study illustrated the powerful potential of DT-CMR in identifying adverse treatment despite successful delivery of viable stem cells. However, it remains to be seen if this recent work is translatable to large animal and clinical studies. In a MI porcine model, in vivo DT-CMR revealed that myocardial fiber orientation was preserved with CDC-derived exosome treatment and adversely changed with placebo treatment consistent with observed viability and function changes.

Introduction

Diffusion-Tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DT-CMR) is capable of mapping myocardial fiber orientation1,2. It has been demonstrated in myocardial infarction (MI) murine models that DT-CMR can identify the effects of stem cell therapy on myocardial fiber orientations3. The study illustrated the powerful potential of DT-CMR in identifying adverse treatment despite successful delivery of viable stem cells. However, it remains to be seen if this recent work is translatable to large animal and clinical studies. The greatest challenge for translating DT-CMR for clinical application is overcoming the sensitivity to bulk motion with gradient strengths available on clinical scanners. We propose the application of a recently developed in vivo cardiac DT-CMR technique4 to characterize myocardial fiber orientation before and after the novel regenerative therapy of using intramyocardial injection of exosomes from cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) in a MI porcine model.

Methods

MI was induced in 14 Yucatan mini pigs by balloon occlusion of the mid-LAD for 2.5 hours. The MI was allowed to heal for 4 weeks for all pigs defining baseline. Group 1 (N=9) was treated with exosome proteins derived from CDCs after an additional 4 weeks of therapy. Group 2 was given a placebo injection of saline. CMR was performed at baseline and 4 weeks after treatment on a 3T Siemens Verio with the following: whole-heart 2D multi-slice (WH) morphological CMR, WH function CINE CMR, 3 short axis slice DT-CMR (M2 Diffusion Prepared bSSFP, 6 dir, b=350 s/mm^2, 8avg, free-breathing), and WH viability CMR (LGE PSIR, TI=315ms). Viability and function CMR yielded scar size (SS) and ejection fraction (EF)5, respectively. SS and EF were calculated semi-automatically using cvi42 software (Circle, Calgary, Canada). For in vivo DT-CMR, mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and helix angle (HA) maps were calculated using custom software built with DIPY library in Python6. HA transmurality slope (HATS) was also calculated by radially sampling the transmural HA along 36 chords and fitting the slope of a linear regression between HA and transmural depth. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to evaluate the difference between mean slice values (G1 N=27, G2 N=15) before and after treatment (p < 0.017 significance). Change (Δ) in MD, FA, and HATS were correlated (R^2) with ΔSS and ΔEF.

Results

For Group 1 (treated), EF, MD, FA, and HATS did not significantly change (Δ: -1±2%, -0.2±0.2 um^2/ms, 0.03±0.03, and 0.02±0.2°/%depth, respectively), while SS was significantly reduced (Δ: -4±2%, p<0.01). In contrast, Group 2 (placebo) exhibited significant (p<0.01) adverse changes with decreased EF (Δ: -6±2%), increased SS (Δ: 4±2%), increased MD (Δ: -0.4±0.3 um^2/ms), decreased FA (Δ: -0.06±0.05), and decreased HATS (-1.1±0.3 vs -0.7±0.3°/%depth). ΔMD and ΔFA weakly correlated with ΔEF (R^2: 0.2 and 0.3, respectively) and ΔSS (R^2: 0.1 and 0.2, respectively). However, ΔHATS significantly (p < 0.01) correlated highly with ΔEF (R^2: 0.8) and ΔSS (R^2: 0.7).

Discussion

The adverse changes seen in the placebo group is consistent with progression of chronic MI with decreased FA, increased MD, increased SS, decreased EF, and decreased HATS (towards 0). The typical chronic MI progression is not seen in the treated group and for SS it is actually reversed. This suggests that the exosomes derived from CDCs has a therapeutic effect in halting the progression of chronic MI. More interesting, DT-CMR adds a unique perspective in which the data suggests that global adverse remodeling of the myocardial architecture is preserved with treatment. The microstructural insight that DT-CMR yields demonstrates that exosome treatment may prevent permeant structural remodeling.

Conclusion

In a MI porcine model, in vivo DT-CMR revealed that myocardial fiber orientation was preserved with CDC-derived exosome treatment and adversely changed with placebo treatment consistent with observed viability and function changes. Furthermore, changes in helix transmurality highly correlated with changes in viability and function.

Acknowledgements

1F31EB018152-01A1

References

1. Reese, T. Imaging myocardial fiber architecture in vivo with magnetic resonance. 34, 786–791 (1995).

2. Sosnovik, D. E., Wang, R., Dai, G., Reese, T. G. & Wedeen, V. J. Diffusion MR tractography of the heart. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 11, 47 (2009).

3. Sosnovik, D. E. et al. Microstructural impact of ischemia and bone marrow-derived cell therapy revealed with diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging tractography of the heart in vivo. Circulation 129, 1731–1741 (2014).

4. Nguyen, C. T. et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI detection of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 17, 1–2 (2015).

5. Malliaras, K. et al. Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Monitor Regenerative Efficacy After Cell Therapy in a Porcine Model of Convalescent Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 128, 2764–2775 (2013).

6. Garyfallidis, E. et al. Dipy–a novel software library for diffusion MR and tractography. 17th Annual Meeting of the Orgnization for Human Brain Mapping (2011).

Figures

Figure 1 – Representative viability images of pre-treatment (A, B) and post-treatment with exosome (C) and placebo (D). Scar size is maintained (1% difference) with exosome treatment and greatly increased (10%) with placebo treatment.

Figure 2 – Representative images (A) of least diffusion weighted (b0), diffusion weighted (DW), MD, FA, and LGE of a baseline measurement 4 weeks after MI. Scar is demarcated with increases in MD, decreases in FA, and increase in LGE signal. Representative helix angle vs transmural depth plots (B) before (red line) and after (black dotted line) treatment. Note the placebo treatment causes the slope of the line to flatten out, while exosome treatment maintains the helical transmurality.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0799