David Raffelt1, Farnoosh Sadeghian1, Brigid Regan2, Sarah Garry2, Samuel Berkovic2, Ingrid Scheffer2, and Alan Connelly1,2
1Florey Institute of Neuroscience, Melbourne, Australia, 2Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Synopsis
Mutations in the gene DEPDC5 cause up to 12% of Familial Focal Epilepsy with Variable Foci. In
this work we performed a fixel-based analysis of diffusion MRI data to understand
how white matter might be altered
in patients with DEPDC5 mediated
frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE). We identified significant reductions in fibre
density in several pathways, including the superior longitudinal fasciculi,
corpus callosum, inferior longitudinal fasciculus and cingulum. We also
investigated FLE mediated by KCNT1 mutation, and found similar pathways affected.
In KCNT1+ve subjects, pathways had reduced
cross-section, suggesting the observed effects may be related to development
and not seizure effects. Purpose
To understand how white matter might be altered in epilepsy mediated by DEPDC5 mutation.
Introduction
Focal epilepsies are the most
common form of epilepsy, with seizures originating in one brain region. While
some focal epilepsies are caused by structural brain lesions, many affected
individuals have normal brain imaging using conventional MRI. Familial Focal Epilepsy
with Variable Foci (FFEVF) is of particular interest because family members
have seizures originating from different cortical regions1.
Recent evidence suggests that approximately 12% of families with Familial Focal Epilepsy contain
mutations in the gene DEPDC52,
which is now known to be critical
for cell growth3,4.
To investigate how white matter
connectivity might be altered in DEPDC5 related epilepsy, we applied a fixel-based analysis (FBA)5 to diffusion weighted MRI
data. The benefit of FBA is its ability to detect group differences in specific
fibre populations within a voxel (i.e. a fixel), even in regions containing crossing fibres5, as well as to identify
altered white matter connectivity as manifested by both fibre density6 and morphology7 differences.
Methods
We recruited 15 subjects that
were positive for DEPDC5 mutations, including 10 cases with frontal lobe
epilepsy (FLE), and 5 unaffected individuals (who did not have seizures). We
compared the 10 DEPDC5+ve FLE subjects to matched controls (Table 1a). To
further investigate if the unaffected DEPDC5+ve subjects had a different
pattern of altered white matter disruption, we also compared the 5 unaffected
subjects to controls (Table 1b).
To investigate if white matter
differences between DEPDC5+ve and control subjects were unique to DEPDC5 or a
consequence of FFEVF in general, we recruited 6 subjects with FLE that were
DEPDC5 negative. All 6 patients were known to be positive for mutations in the
gene KCNT1 . We compared the 6 KCNT1+ve
FLE patients with controls (Table 1c).
DWIs were acquired on a Siemens
3T Trio (60 directions, b-value=3000 s/mm2, voxel size 2.5 × 2.5 ×
2.5 mm3). Pre-processing was performed as described in 6. FODs were computed by Robust
Spherical Deconvolution8 using MRtrix (www.mrtrix.org).
A population-specific FOD template was generated from a subset of data (12 patients
and 12 controls) and all FOD images were registered to that template9.
To identify WM
differences between patients and controls, three factors were quantified in all
white matter fixels: Fibre Density (FD)6, Fibre Cross-section (FC)7 and also combined Fibre Density and Cross-section (FDC)6 (Fig. 1).
Statistical
analysis was performed using connectivity-based fixel enhancement (CFE)5. We assigned
family-wise error corrected p-values to each fixel using permutation testing of
the CFE enhanced t-statistics (5000 permutations). Significant fixels (p <
0.05) were displayed using MRtrix3, where each fixel was colour-coded
according to the fixel orientation (red: R-L, blue: I-S, green: A-P).
Results
When comparing the 10 FLE DEPDC5+ve
subjects to controls, we identified several pathways with a significant
reduction in FD compared to controls (Fig. 2a). Affected fibre pathways include
the genu and splenium of corpus callosum, cingulum, inferior frontal occipital
fasciculus, and superior longitudinal fasciculi (SLF). As shown by Fig. 2b,
there were very few significant decreases in FC. In the combined FDC analysis fewer
pathways were significant, suggesting that combining FC with FD dilutes the
statistical power of FC alone (Fig. 2c).
In the
analysis of unaffected DEPDC5+ve subjects (Table 1b), no significant fixels were
identified in the FD, FC or FDC (not shown). While this group contains only 5
subjects and therefore statistical power is limited, it nevertheless suggests
that WM pathways are only affected in DEPDC5+ve individuals with Epilepsy.
Figure 3
shows fixels with reduced FD, FC and FDC in KCNT1+ve
FLE subjects. Aside from the cingulum, alterations were observed in similar
pathways to those observed in the DEPDC5+ve
FLE analysis. The principal point of difference,
however, is that the most extensive reductions are observed in the FC analysis
(Fig.3 b).
Discussion
The decreases in FD, FC and FDC can be
interpreted as a reduction in the number of axons in the affected pathways,
which presumably implies a reduction in connectivity. While there are similar
pathways affected in both DEPDC5+ FLE
and KCNT1+ FLE, the different
manifestation of the WM changes (FD vs FC) suggests differences in brain
development rather than a consequence of seizures.
This study demonstrates the benefit of using FBA
to identify specific fibre pathway alterations even in regions with crossing
fibres (e.g. SLF).
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Scheffer IE,
Phillips HA, O’Brien CE, et al. Familial partial epilepsy with variable foci: a
new partial epilepsy syndrome with suggestion of linkage to chromosome 2. Ann
Neurol. 1998;44(6).
2. Dibbens LM,
de Vries B, Donatello S, et al. Mutations in DEPDC5 cause familial focal
epilepsy with variable foci. Nat Genet. 2013;45(5):546-551.
3. Simons M,
Gault WJ, Gotthardt D, et al. Electrochemical cues regulate assembly of the
Frizzled/Dishevelled complex at the plasma membrane during planar epithelial
polarization. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(3):286-294.
4. Chen S, Hamm
HE. DEP domains: More than just membrane anchors. Dev Cell.
2006;11(4):436-438.
5. Raffelt D a.,
Smith RE, Ridgway GR, et al. Connectivity-Based Fixel Enhancement: Whole-Brain
Statistical Analysis of Diffusion MRI Measures in the Presence of Crossing
Fibres. Neuroimage. 2015;117:40-55.
6. Raffelt D,
Tournier JD, Rose S, et al. Apparent Fibre Density: A novel measure for the
analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage.
2012;59(4):3976-3994.
7. Raffelt D, Smith
RE, Tournier J-D, Vaughan D, Jackson GD, Connelly A. Fixel-Based Morphometry:
Whole-Brain White Matter Morphometry in the Presence of Crossing Fibres. In: Proceedings
of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Vol Milan,
Italy: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine; 2014:731.
8. Tournier JD,
Calamante F, Connelly A. A robust spherical deconvolution method for the
analysis of low SNR or low angular resolution diffusion data. In: International
Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Vol ; 2013:772.
9. Raffelt D,
Tournier JD, Fripp J, Crozier S, Connelly A, Salvado O. Symmetric diffeomorphic
registration of fibre orientation distributions. Neuroimage.
2011;56(3):1171-1180.