Tim J Veersema1, Cyrille H Ferrier1, Pieter van Eijsden1, Peter H Gosselaar1, Fredy Visser2,3, Jaco JM Zwanenburg2,4, Hans Hoogduin2, Gerárd AP de Kort2, Jeroen Hendrike2, and Kees PJ Braun1
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands, 4Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
For this series we assessed
all 26 epilepsy patients who underwent 7T MRI for pre-surgical evaluation in our center, and
whose scans (both 7T and lower field) were discussed during epilepsy surgery
meetings (ESM). We compared the conclusions of the visual assessments of 1.5T
or 3T, and 7T MRI as agreed upon by the ESM team.
7T MRI holds a promise to improve identification of epileptogenic structural
abnormalities in patients with intractable epilepsy. In our series of 26 patients
with refractory focal epilepsy, multidisciplinary evaluation of 7T MRI identified
additional lesions not seen on lower-field MRI in five patients (19.2%). Purpose
In patients with medically
intractable focal epilepsy MRI is an essential tool for determining an
underlying pathology. In these patients, resection of an epileptogenic zone can
be considered. A structural MRI abnormality is a strong predictor of good outcome
of surgery compared to so called MRI-negative cases
1. One important cause of focal refractory epilepsy and the most common pathology in MRI-negative patients is focal cortical dysplasia (FCD)
2,3.
The promise of 7T MRI is that structural abnormalities can be found where
none were found at lower field strengths. The aim of this study was to determine what the diagnostic value of 7T MRI is
in epilepsy patients evaluated for the possibility of surgical treatment, who
already underwent 1.5 or 3T MRI.
Methods
Since November 2008 a
selection of patients underwent 7T imaging in the University Medical Center
Utrecht in the context of clinical evaluation of medically intractable epilepsy
and surgical candidacy. During regular multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery
meetings (ESM) all available clinical information and the results of all
ancillary investigations are reviewed in order to decide on the indication for
epilepsy surgery. For this series we assessed all 26 patients who underwent 7T
MRI for pre-surgical evaluation, and whose scans (both 7T and lower field) were
discussed during ESM. We compared the conclusions of the visual assessments of 1.5T or 3T, and 7T MRI as agreed upon by the ESM team, including an experienced
epilepsy neuroradiologist.
Scans were performed on a Phillips Achieva 7T MRI system (Philips Healthcare)
with a 16 channel receive coil or, after May 2011, a 32-channel receive head
coil combined with dual channel transmit coil.
Scan protocols.
The current protocol consists of T1, T2, FLAIR, and T2*-weighted sequences, and
a gradient echo white matter suppression (WMS) sequence, with 0.5 -
0.8 mm resolution; acquisition time ≈ 45 minutes. Since 2008
there have been some adjustments in the protocol, mainly the addition of the
WMS sequence and modification of the T2* echo times (current parameters in figure 1).
Results
23 patients
underwent 7T MRI because absence of a lesion at 1.5/3T MRI (age 7-44, median 16). In 4 of 23 patients a lesion could be
identified on 7T MRI. Two of these patients were operated, with histology confirming FCD
type 2A in both (exemplary case in figure
3). The other two patients are planned for resective surgery with tailoring
using electrocorticography, in both FCD is suspected (exemplary case in figure 4).
Three patients (age 14, 15 and 28) had 7T MRI because of clinical suspicion of
additional lesions undetected at lower field strength. In one patient with
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex additional subtle tubers and radial migration lines
were identified. This patient underwent a temporal lobe resection and
electrocorticography-guided lesionectomy of these right frontal tubers. In two
other patients, one with hippocampal sclerosis and one with white matter
abnormalities of unclear clinical relevance, no additional lesions were
identified, nonetheless this information proved valuable for the clinical management.
Of note is that 7T MRI revealed additional lesions after these patients had previous good quality 3T MRI scans with dedicated epilepsy protocols including coronal
FLAIR and 3D T1 sequences.
Figure 2 summarizes the imaging conclusions of the ESM based on lower-field MRI
and those after 7T MRIs had
been discussed and lists the number of patients who underwent surgery and their
histological findings.
Discussion
In 5
of 26 (19.2%) patients with no lesion or the suspicion of additional lesions on
previous imaging, assessment of 7T MRI was an important or even pivotal element
of the clinical evaluation. These patients have been operated on, with
confirmation of FCD (n=2), TSC (n=1) or were now planned for surgical treatment
under suspicion of FCD (n=2).
The greatest benefit of 7T is the possibility to obtain high resolution 3D
images in clinical settings with good SNR, thus eliminating partial volume
effects while maintaining sufficient tissue contrast.
In 19
out of 23 (82.6%) patients with non-lesional lower-field MRI, 7T MRI did not show
epilepsy-related lesions either. Possibly there is no structural
substrate, but it is known that a portion of these patients do prove to have
histological abnormalities eventually
2. In our series three patients had confirmed FCD or
mild malformation of cortical development in the absence of any reported MR
abnormalities at 7T, even after
retrospective review.
Conclusion
7T MRI
holds a promise to improve identification of epileptogenic structural
abnormalities in patients with intractable epilepsy. In our series of 26 patients
with refractory focal epilepsy, multidisciplinary evaluation of 7T MRI identified
additional lesions not seen on lower-field MRI in five patients (19.2%).
Acknowledgements
Tim Veersema is supported by a research grant from the Dutch Epilepsy Foundation (#12.12).References
1. Téllez-Zenteno
JF, Hernández Ronquillo L, Moien-Afshari F, Wiebe S. Surgical outcomes in
lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy
Res. 2010;89(2-3):310-8.
2. Krsek P, Maton
B, Korman B, et al. Different features of histopathological subtypes of
pediatric focal cortical dysplasia. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(6):758–69.
3. Blümcke I,
Thom M, Aronica E, et al. The clinicopathologic spectrum of focal cortical
dysplasias: a consensus classification proposed by an ad hoc Task Force of the
ILAE Diagnostic Methods Commission. Epilepsia. 2011;52(1):158–74.
4. Visser F,
Zwanenburg JJM, Hoogduin JM, Luijten PR. High-Resolution Magnetization-Prepared
3D-FLAIR Imaging at 7.0 Tesla. 2010;202:194–202.