Cortical Laminar Resting-State Fluctuations Scale with Hypercapnic Response
Maria Guidi1, Laurentius Huber2, Leonie Lampe1, and Harald E. Möller1

1Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 2NIMH, Bethesda, MD, United States

Synopsis

Cortical layer-dependent fMRI can investigate effective connectivity of the brain. However, in order to obtain layer-dependent activity information, the unspecific fMRI sensitivity to draining veins must be accounted for, e.g., with calibrated BOLD methods. Regional variations of resting-state fMRI signal fluctuations have been suggested to resemble features of baseline physiology, such as venous blood volume and vascular reactivity. In this study, we investigate the possibility to use resting-state signal fluctuations to normalize/calibrate layer-dependent fMRI task-responses. In calibration studies with induced hypercapnia, we validate the new approach to obtain cortical profiles of vascular reactivity by comparisons with the established M-value.

Purpose

Quantitative fMRI is in the focus of current neuroimaging. However, several reports suggest that the use of a breath-hold or gas-manipulation task (both causing discomfort) may be unnecessary.1 Such challenges are believed to elicit a purely vascular response. Alternative ways of measuring the cerebrovascular reactivity were suggested from work focusing on resting-state fluctuations.2,3 These signal fluctuations, which are believed to result from global changes in venous oxygenation have been used as a measure of vascular reactivity and even for inter-subject BOLD signal calibration.4 Previous investigations have mainly tackled the problem on a voxel, ROI, and inter-subject basis. Recently, it was shown that physiologically driven signal fluctuations in BOLD time series exhibit a specific depth-dependent signature,5 which appears to be similar to hypercapnia responses.6

The aim of this work is to compare the resting-state fluctuation amplitude (RSFA) with the hypercapnic BOLD response on a laminar basis. To assess potential employment in normalizing the BOLD response, fluctuation amplitudes were additionally compared to the laminar M parameter calculated from the Davis model.

Methods

Subjects and sequence: N=5 participants were examined on a Siemens 7T scanner with a combined BOLD and VASO sequence7 at a nominal in-plane resolution of 0.8×0.8 mm² and slice thickness of 1.2-1.5mm. Imaging focused on the hand-knob of one hemisphere with 5-7 slices perpendicular to the cortical surface. The gas-manipulation session consisted of administration of mild hypercapnia (5%CO2) for two 3min periods (total scan time 15 min). The resting-state session consisted of a 12-min scan with acquisition of either BOLD contrast (TR=1.5s, 3 participants) or BOLD interleaved to VASO (TR=3s, 2 participants).

Extraction of profiles: The resting-state time series were bandpass filtered to obtain low- (0.01-0.1 Hz) and high-frequency series (0.1-0.25 Hz). Layering was done using an equidistant approach directly in EPI space. In total, 20 laminae were constructed in each subject, of which the inner-most 10 to 12 were selected for the correlation analysis. Temporal standard deviation maps were obtained and lamina-dependent values extracted. The laminar M parameter was computed with the Davis model8 as previously described.6

Results

Fig. 1 depicts results from the M1/S1 region of one subject. Significant hypercapnia responses can be detected with BOLD and VASO at the ultra-high resolutions used here. This permits layer-dependent analysis in EPI space (colorful edges overlayed on EPI images). Fig. 2 shows that cortical profiles of the calibration parameter M obtained with hypercapnia and resting-state signal fluctuations are very similar. Both are highest at the cortical surface and decrease with cortical depth.

Scatter plots between laminar BOLD RSFA and laminar temporal standard deviation (tSD) of the hypercapnia-BOLD time courses were constructed and the Pearson correlation coefficient calculated (Fig. 2). Results in Fig. 3 show that the correlations are generally quite high, however, with some degree of variation across participants.

Discussion

The previously observed positive correlation between hypercapnic response and RSFA is confirmed at a laminar level. The specific signature of decreasing RSFA and M with cortical depth is consistent with the underlying variation of venous blood volume.5 The source of the correlation might primarily result from large BOLD fluctuations at the pial surface, which would explain a lower correlation with the parameter M.

Conclusion

The results shown here suggest that a layer-dependent fMRI signal calibration factor might be obtained from resting-state fMRI time series without the need to conduct uncomfortable hypercapnia-inducing breathing manipulations. Both, RSFA and calibration parameter M capture the cortical profile of vascular reactivity variations with cortical depth. The presented validation experiments suggest that fMRI signal calibration with RSFA may gain importance in future experiments to reveal layer-dependent brain activity information from high-resolution fMRI.

Acknowledgements

MG was supported by the Initial Training Network, HiMR, funded by the FP7 Marie Curie Actions of the European Commission (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN-316716).

References

[1] Blockley N , et al. Calibrating the BOLD response without administering gases: Comparison of hypercapnia calibration with calibration using an asymmetric spin echo. NeuroImage 2015;104:423-429.

[2] Kannurpatti SS, et al. Prediction of task-related BOLD fMRI with amplitude signatures of resting-state fMRI. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2012;6(7):1-10.

[3] Jahanian H, et al. Assessing vascular reactivity with resting-state BOLD signal fluctuations: a clinically practical alternative to the breath-hold challenge. Proc ISMRM 2015;22:4171.

[4] Kazan S, et al. Vascular autorescaling of fMRI (VasA fMRI) improves sensitivity of population studies: A pilot study. NeuroImage, 2016;124:794–805.

[5] Polimeni, et al. Cortical depth dependence of physiological fluctuations and whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity at 7T. Proc ISMRM 2015;23:592.

[6] Guidi M, et al. Layer-Dependent Calibrated BOLD Response in Human M1. Proc ISMRM 2015;23:562.

[7] Huber L, et al. Slab-selective, BOLD-corrected VASO at 7 Tesla provides measures of cerebral blood volume reactivity with high signal-to-noise ratio. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2014;72(1):137-148.

[8] Davis TL, et al. Calibrated functional MRI: mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:1834-1839.

Figures

z-stat BOLD and VASO maps of a representative participant upon gas manipulation and corresponding layering.

Extracted M profile and temporal standard deviation (tSD) profile of the resting-state BOLD timeseries for one representative participant. A scatter plot between the amplitude of the hypercapnia standard deviation and BOLD RSFA is shown; each point represents one lamina.

Pearson correlation coefficient for the correlation between BOLD RSFA the standard deviation of the hypercapnia-induced BOLD response (HC BOLD tSD) and the parameter M of the Davis model.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0769