Resting state and stimulus evoked fMRI in awake, head-posted and habituated rats.
Pei-Ching Chang 1, Daniele Procissi2, Maria Virginia Centeno1, and Vania Apkarian1

1Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States

Synopsis

fMRI in rodents is a major tool for basic neuroscience research. It allows investigation of brain networks in different animal models of disease and injury using translational methods with clinical relevance. In many instances it is essential to image animals in an awake condition (i.e. without anesthesia). While several have shown it is possible to image animals in the awake condition they nearly all require initial anesthesia and forced restraint. In this study we describe a strategy to image rats trained to be "comfortably" restrained and head posted and show how it is possible to enhance the performance of the fMRI experiments.

TARGET AUDIENCE:

Preclinical neuroscientist interested in awake fMRI in rodents

BACKGROUND:

Brain fMRI in rodent animal models is a fundamental tool for exploring brain functions. However in rodents one requires anesthetics to control stress level and reduce motion. While anesthesia does maximize experimental control, it affects brain activity and restricts the type of experiments one can perform. Several have shown how it is possible to image awake animals but in the majority of cases this involves using a combination of initial anesthesia followed by forced restraint. These studies have shown that anesthesia has implications for BOLD signals. We describe a strategy for awake rat fMRI which relies on habituating the animal to a gentle restraint ("snuggle sleeve") and a head restraining system (see Figure 1). The goal was to show that any level of anesthesia during the process perturbs the study under investigation and that the head posting method combined with extensive training and habituation can provide better results for fMRI.

METHODS:

The setup used for is shown in Figure 1. Rats were slowly acclimated using short but systematic training procedure in a mock scanner setup. Rats were trained eight days prior to fMRI scans. Each training day lasted half hour with animal in mock scanner, head posted and with gradient sounds (~140dB). Custom made “snuggle sleeves” were adjustable to enhance comfort and guarantee restraint while still allowing access to head-nut and paws. After several sessions rats entered voluntarily into the “snuggle sleeve”; no initial anesthesia was required. Following a session blood was drawn and corticosteroid levels (stress hormone) was measured.

10 male Sprague Dawley rats (325-400g) were used in this study. Two fMRI sessions consisting of a 1) resting state fMRI, and 2) stimulus-evoked fMRI were conducted sequentially on the awake rats. The same experiments were then repeated under anesthesia ( ~1% isoflurane/O2). Resting-statefMRI lasted 8 minutes (no external stimuli). Stimulus-evoked fMRI was comprised of 6 repetitive stimulus ON/OFF blocks (2sec-off/12sec-on/36sec-off). The air-puff stimuli used consisted in a 5 g force innocuous stimuli on right hind paw. MR experiments were carried out on a Bruker Clinscan 7T. We used an EPI sequence with TR= 2000ms, TE=18ms, in-plane resolution= 0.38mmx0.38mm, slice thickness=0.5 mm, number of repetitions=240 for resting-state fMRI and 150 for stimulus-evoked fMRI. Post-hoc analysis on head motion was estimated using FSL’s MCFLIRT tool. The motion timeseries was calculated to measure the root-mean-square displacement from one time point relative to the preceding time point.

RESULTS

After few training-days stress was greatly reduced, as observed behaviorally (e.g. little or no struggling, eye secretions indicative of stress in rat, or excessive vocalizations ) and through stress hormone levels (data not shown here ). Head motion for each rat was recorded from imaging session (Figure2) for both experiments. Directional displacements are color encoded with the stimulation pattern shown in black (Fig 2A). Except in one case, awake rats did not exhibit excessive head motion ( < 70um). No significant difference between awake and anesthetized. For stimulus-evoked fMRI, the head motion did not appear to be associated with the pattern of the stimulation, (i.e. it did not interfere with our ability to detect the relevant signal changes). In awake condition, unlilateral air-puff stimulation (Figure 3) resulted in significant increase in fMRI signal in bilateral S1, bilateral thalamus, and prefrontal regions including ACC and mPFC (P < 0.05, FWE corrected); the greatest signal change was on the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulation. No significant change was found in anesthetized condition (P < 0.05, FWE corrected). Given that contralateral S1 hind limb region showed the most prominent response to the air-puff stimulation, we examined how S1 hind limb region was functionally coupled to other brain areas using resting state (Figure 4). We found that when rats are awake, S1 hind limb region showed significant correlations with the same region in the other hemisphere. Anesthesia reduces this connection between hemispheres.

DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION:

In the present study we demonstrate that rats trained over the course of 8 days can be restrained in a comfortable “snuggle sleeve” and head posted while undergoing fMRI. This setup not only reduces motion but does not require any initial anesthesia. Habituation with this instrumental setup allows rats to be awake, conscious and be relatively still during fMRI experiments. In addition rats had more fMRI activation in response to air-puff stimulation and showed more widespread functional connectivity in awake condition, compared to when the rats were anesthetized. These results suggest that the described methodology can enhance performance of fMRI experiments in awake condition rodents.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

No reference found.

Figures

Experimental Apparatus. (a) head posted rat. (b) snuggle sleeve with access to head nut, hind paw, and tail. (c) Head plate for fixing head nut and circular groove for rf surface coil. (d) rat with air-puff injectortopaw. (e) Illustration of assembled apparatus .

Color coded curves show the head motion as obtained from MRI data for all different sessions: rsfMRI, Stimuli-Evoked and Random stimulus

(a) Group-averaged maps are displayed as statistical t-value maps overlaid on anatomical images. (b) The statistical t-value maps with less stringent thresholds for multiple comparisons (uncorrected p < 0.01, k = 26 voxels) are displayed. (c) Percent signal change as a function of time in contralateral S1HL, contralateral Tha, and Cg1 in awake (red) and anesthetized (blue) condition (mean ± SEM). Stimulus period is labeled in gray.

rs FC of the somatosensory cortex, in awake and anesthetized conditions. Seed was derived from the peak activation of the left somatosensory following air-puff stimulation (Fig. 3). The group-averaged maps are t-value maps. (a) Group-averaged resting-state functional connectivity maps in awake and anesthetized conditions (p < 0.05, FWE corrected , n =10). (b) statistical t-value maps with less statistical stringent thresholds for multiple comparisons (uncorrected p < 0.01, k = 26 voxels).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0765