Synopsis
Diffusion tensor imaging
(DTI) has been used to measure changes in restricted diffusion in skeletal
muscle after injury, which are thought to track microstructural, and therefore functional changes. However, there are few direct
comparisons between muscle microstructure
and DTI measurements because it is difficult to precisely control in vivo experiments. Here, we use a
computational (in silico) modeling
approach to explore changes in DTI measurements as muscle microstructure is
systemically changed. Muscle fiber diameter and edema have the largest effects
on the DT. Additionally, we have shown
multi-echo DTI is required to resolve changes in microstructure when edema is
present. Purpose
To understand the effects of muscle
microstructure on the diffusion tensor.
Methods
We hypothesize 1) decreased fiber size
decreases λ2 and λ3, with no effect on λ1, 2) fibrosis has little effect on the
diffusion tensor, and 3) when edema is present, multi-echo DTI is required to
resolve microstructural changes of muscle tissue.
Simplified models of muscle microstructure were
integrated into diffusion simulation software (see below) to study the
relationship between muscle fiber size, fibrosis, and edema on the diffusion tensor
using single- and multi-echo DT-MRI techniques. The MRI simulation tool DifSim1 was used to model DTI
experiments within complex structures. DifSim employs MCell, a Monte Carlo
simulator for cellular microphysiology, to simulate the diffusion of particles,
and tracks particle location, signal amplitude and phase, within a user defined
arbitrarily complex model. DifSim is capable of supporting boundary
interactions, particle interactions, and multiple molecular species with
different diffusion coefficients and T2-relaxation constants. MRI pulse
sequence parameters were as follows: diffusion-weighted multi-spin-echo, TE=21.76ms,
b=500s/mm2, voxel size=200μmx200μmx200μm, number of echoes=16, echo
spacing=10ms. Data was analyzed using a custom Matlab program, using the
equations outlined by Fan et al2.
Muscle fibers were approximated as tightly
packed hexagons, surrounded by ECM as shown in Figure 1. Fiber diameter,
fibrosis, and increased extra-cellular water content due to edema were varied
across a range of physiologically relevant dimensions and concentrations,
(Table 1). Model inputs for diffusion coefficients and T2-relaxation rates are
reported in Table 2. To relate diffusion measurements to individual features of
muscle microstructure, we used linear or non-linear regression (when
appropriate).
To test our hypothesis that multi-echo DTI is
required to measure fiber size changes in the presence of edema, we compared
diffusion measurements taken by single-echo and multi-echo DTI in normal (4%
volume fraction extracellular water) and edematous (40% volume fraction
extracellular water) muscle, across a range of fiber sizes. Non-linear
regression was used to describe the relationship between fiber size and
diffusion in non-edematous muscle using single-echo DTI. Coefficient of
variation from this regression was used to determine which DTI technique is
most closely related to single echo DTI of normal muscle.
Results
As fiber diameter decreases below 60μm, a
nonlinear decrease of λ
2 and λ
3 and a nonlinear increase
in fractional anisotropy was found, while λ
1 remained constant
(Figures 2A,C). Small linear changes were observed in all diffusion
measurements except λ
1 as diffusion increased (Figures 2B,D). There was an exponential relationship between
mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy and fiber size in non-edematous
muscle (r
2=0.996 mean diffusivity; r
2=0.995 fractional
anisotropy) using single-echo DTI (Figure 3). Similarly, an exponential
relationship was observed for intracellular diffusion measured with multi-echo
DTI in the presence of edema (r
2 = 98.8% mean diffusivity; r
2
97.9% fractional anisotropy). However, this relationship did not explain the
variance in mean diffusivity or fractional anisotropy when measured with
single-echo DTI in edematous muscle.
Discussion
In this study, we have
described, with a series of highly controlled simulations, the direct
relationship between muscle microstructure and the diffusion tensor.
We identified a plateau in
diffusion measurements as muscle fiber diameter increases to 60μm. Since
average skeletal muscle fiber diameter is around 50μm, DTI is a suitable
technique to determine if fibers have a decreased diameter. However, DTI is
likely not a good tool to measure hypertrophic changes in muscle, or study
animals with larger muscle fiber diameters.
As the sarcolemma (membrane) is thought to be
the primary barrier to diffusion, decreased fractional anisotropy is thought to
be indicative of fiber hypertrophy3. However, less restricted diffusion is also observed as a result of
edema, likely due to increased extra-cellular water volume or membrane damage,
even in injuries where fiber atrophy is known to occur. Multi-echo DTI has been
used to separate the diffusion signal coming from short (intracellular) and
long (extracellular) T2 species in muscle2, 4, 5.
However, multi-echo DTI has not been used to validate underlying
microstructural changes that cause the restricted diffusion signal. Our results demonstrate that, in the presence of edema, traditional
single-echo DTI is biased by increased extracellular water, regardless of
underlying fiber atrophy. Using multi-echo DTI, we can resolve microstructural
changes from the diffusion tensor of the short T2 species. Future work will
investigate the effect of fiber permeability, fiber shape, and interactions
between multiple microstructural changes in muscle and the resulting diffusion
profile.
Conclusion
These findings describe the relationship
between microstructural features of fiber size, and fibrosis to diffusion
measured with DTI. We demonstrate in the presence of edema, multi-echo DTI must
be used in order to measure underlying microstructural changes.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Balls, G.T. and L.R. Frank,
A simulation environment for diffusion
weighted MR experiments in complex media. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,
2009. 62(3): p. 771-778.
2.
Fan,
R.H. and M.D. Does, Compartmental
Relaxation and DTI Measurements In Vivo in λ-Carrageenan Induced Edema in Rat
Skeletal Muscle. NMR in Biomedicine, 2008. 21(6): p. 566.
3.
Van
Doom, A., et al., Determination of muscle
fibre orientation using diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur. J. Morphol, 1996. 34: p. 5-10.
4.
Ababneh,
Z., et al., Biexponential
parameterization of diffusion and T2 relaxation decay curves in a rat muscle edema
model: decay curve components and water compartments. Magnetic resonance in
medicine, 2005. 54(3): p. 524-531.
5.
Cole,
W.C., A.D. Leblanc, and S.G. Jhingran, The
origin of biexponential T2 relaxation in muscle water. Magnetic resonance
in medicine, 1993. 29(1): p. 19-24.
6.
Crémillieux,
Y., S. Ding, and J.F. Dunn, High-resolution
in vivo measurements of transverse relaxation times in rats at 7 Tesla.
Magnetic resonance in medicine, 1998. 39(2):
p. 285-290.
7. Diakova,
G., J.P. Korb, and R.G. Bryant, The
magnetic field dependence of water T1 in tissues. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine, 2012. 68(1): p. 272-277.
8.
Gefen,
A., et al., The free diffusion of
macromolecules in tissue-engineered skeletal muscle subjected to large
compression strains. Journal of biomechanics, 2008. 41(4): p. 845-853.
9.
Moll,
W., The diffusion coefficient of
myoglobin in muscle homogenate. Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte
Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 1968. 299(3): p. 247-251.
10.
Papadopoulos, S., K.D.
Jürgens, and G. Gros, Protein diffusion
in living skeletal muscle fibers: dependence on protein size, fiber type, and
contraction. Biophysical Journal, 2000. 79(4): p. 2084-2094.
11.
Gilbert,
D.L., et al., Macromolecular diffusion through
collagen membranes. International journal of pharmaceutics, 1988. 47(1): p. 79-88.
12.
Ramanujan,
S., et al., Diffusion and convection in
collagen gels: implications for transport in the tumor interstitium.
Biophysical journal, 2002. 83(3): p.
1650-1660.