Mariska P. Luttje1, Ingmar J. Voogt1, Marco van Vulpen1, Peter R. Luijten1, Dennis W.J. Klomp1, and Alexander J.E. Raaijmakers1
1Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
In
this study, we demonstrate that a dipole transceive antenna array with a loop coil
receive array at 7T substantially outperforms state of the art 3T MRI of the
prostate. Using this setup we demonstrated for the first time the intrinsic SNR
benefits of using the higher field strength of 7 tesla for prostate MR imaging
compared to a clinically used prostate imaging setup at 3 tesla: an overall
gain in SNR of 2.1 fold as obtained in 6 subjects.Introduction
Multiple studies have shown that multiparametric prostate
MRI is helpful in detecting, localizing and staging prostate cancer [1-3]. For diagnostic and therapeutic purposes
it is important to detect extracapsular tumor extension and get more insights
into the tumor metabolism. This could be improved by the higher
signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) at ultra-high field systems like 7 tesla, giving
access to higher temporal and/or spatial resolution or improve contrast to
noise [4]. This results not only in the
opportunity to detect smaller tumors as a result of reduced partial volume
effects, but also paves the way for new methods to gain insight into tumor
metabolism and aggressiveness, e.g. MR spectroscopy [5, 6].
Purpose
In this study, we demonstrate that a dipole transceive antenna
array with loop receive arrays at 7T substantially outperforms state of the art
3T MRI of the prostate. Apart from demonstrating the design of the new setup,
we show intrinsic SNR comparisons to the 3T setup obtained from 6 healthy volunteers.
Furthermore high-resolution T2weighted images were acquired in one patient with
prostate cancer.
Methods
6 healthy volunteers (age: 24-56, BMI: 21.6-31.8) and one
patient (62 years, PSA: 9.7 ng/ml) with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (Gleason
score: 3+4 in 9/10 biopsies) were included in this study. All 7 subjects were
scanned on both 3T and 7T after informed consent was obtained.
For this study a 8-element transceive array consisting of
fractioned dipole antennas combined with a detunable 16-element receive only
loop coil array was used at 7T (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, NL) [7],
Figure 1. At 3T (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, NL) ( a 32 element
torso/cardiac coil was used.
The healthy volunteer MRI protocol included on both 3T
and 7T the following exams: A survey for localization purposes, B1 shim series
to optimize B1 levels in the prostate, AFI B1 map [8], T2weighted imaging for anatomical images and a proton density
gradient echo acquisition combined with a noise scan for SNR determination. The
proton density gradient echo sequence was obtained using TR/TE=100/5 ms, a flip
angle of 1º, FOV =250x430x25mm3, voxel size= 2x2x2.5mm3 and reconstruction
voxel size = 1x1x1mm3. The echo time (TE) was kept short to exclude T2 effects,
while for T1 exclusion the repetition time (TR) was relatively long compared to
the very low flip angle used. Moreover, the SNR was normalized to the actual
flip angle applied. The patient protocol included a T2weighted acquisition
using the following parameters: TR/TE= 5900/100 ms, TSE factor=29, SENSE factor
RL=1.5, FOV =200x200x90mm3, voxel size= 0.78x0.78x3 mm3 and reconstruction
voxel size = 0.5x0.5x3mm3 on both 3 and 7T. At 7T also high resolution images
were acquired using voxel sizes of 0.5x0.5x2mm3 and 0.35x0.35x2mm3 to explore
the possibilities that the extra SNR provides.
Results
In Figure 2 the SNR maps of all six volunteers are shown
for both 3 and 7T. The overview images clearly show the difference in signal
homogeneity throughout the pelvis between 3 and 7T. When comparing the
zoomed-in maps a difference in SNR in the prostate can clearly be observed.
To determine the SNR in the prostate a rectangular ROI
was delineated midgland with dimensions as large as the prostate size would
allow. At 3 tesla an SNR of 19.8±3.7 was obtained, at 7 tesla an SNR of
41.6±8.6 was measured in the same volunteers. This results in an average gain
of intrinsic SNR of 2.1 fold in the prostate,
Figure 3.
In one prostate cancer patient (62 years, PSA: 9.7 ng/ml,
Gleason score: 3+4) T2weighted images were acquired at 7T after the clinical 3T
MR examination, both with external coils only. When comparing the clinical 3T
examination to the 7T scan with the same resolution, Figure 4, the T2w contrast
at 7T shows a clear difference between healthy and tumor areas, furthermore an
excellent detail within the prostate gland can be obtained at 7 tesla.
Anatomical details and contrast between healthy and tumor
areas remain visible even at the resolution of 0.35x0.35x2mm3 at 7 tesla,
Figure 5.
Conclusion
Using the 24 channel body array at 7T, we demonstrated
for the first time the intrinsic SNR benefits of using the higher field
strength of 7 tesla for prostate MR imaging compared to state-of-the-art 3T MRI.
On average an overall gain in SNR of 2.1 fold was observed between 7T and 3T.
Furthermore high resolution imaging was obtained at 7 tesla in one prostate
cancer patient, to show the potential imaging resolutions when stepping up to
ultra-high field prostate imaging.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Shukla-Dave,
Amita, and Hedvig Hricak. "Role of MRI in prostate cancer detection."
NMR in Biomedicine 27.1 (2014): 16-24.
2. Nagarajan,
Rajakumar, et al. "MR spectroscopic imaging and diffusion-weighted
imaging of prostate cancer with Gleason scores." Journal of Magnetic
Resonance Imaging 36.3 (2012): 697-703.
3. Tempany,
Clare, and Felipe Franco. "Prostate MRI: Update and current roles." Applied
Radiology 41.3 (2012): 17.
4. Cornfeld, Daniel M., and Jeffrey C. Weinreb. "MR imaging
of the prostate: 1.5 T versus 3T." Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of
North America 15.3 (2007): 433-448.
5. Kobus,
Thiele, et al. "In vivo assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using
magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 3 T with an endorectal coil." European
urology 60.5 (2011): 1074-1080.
6. Kurth,
Johannes, Elita DeFeo, and Leo L. Cheng. "Magnetic resonance spectroscopy:
A promising tool for the diagnostics of human prostate cancer?." Urologic
Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. Vol. 29. No. 5. Elsevier, 2011.
7. Voogt, Ingmar, et al. "Combined 8-channel transceiver fractionated dipole antenna array
with a 16-channel loop coil receive array for body imaging at 7 Tesla." Proceedings
of the ISMRM 2015, p631, Toronto, Canada
8. Yarnykh, Vasily L. "Actual
flip-angle
imaging in the pulsed steady state: a method for rapid three-dimensional
mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field." Magnetic resonance in
Medicine 57.1 (2007): 192-200.