Abdominal MRF at Ultra-High-Field Strengths
Martijn A Cloos1,2, Bei Zhang1,2, and Daniel K Sodickson1,2

1Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States

Synopsis

Like other magnetic resonance (MR) techniques before it, magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) was developed and applied in the traditional context of a precisely calibrated and uniform radiofrequency excitation field. Plug & Play Parallel Transmission (PnP-PTX), on the other hand, was designed to liberate MRF from these constraints. We evaluate the impact of excitation field non-uniformities on abdominal MRF experiments at different field strengths, and show that PnP-PTX has the potential to alleviate these challenges, and thereby opens opens up a new route towards robust, quantitative, whole-body MRI for ultra-high-field systems.

Introduction

Like other magnetic resonance (MR) techniques before it [1], MR Fingerprinting (MRF) [2, 3] was developed and applied in the traditional context of a precisely calibrated and uniform radiofrequency excitation field (B1+). In practice, however, the B1+ field distribution is rarely uniform. Therefore, Plug & Play Parallel Transmission (PnP-PTX) [4, 5] was designed, which liberates MRF from these constraints and abandons the longstanding campaign for a uniform B1+ field. In this work we evaluate impact of B1+ field heterogeneities on abdominal MRF experiments at different field strengths and explore the potential of PnP-PTX to enable quantitative body imaging at ultra-high field strengths.

Theory & Methods

Subject-specific electrodynamic interactions between the incident RF field and patient anatomy preclude the construction of a tractable general-purpose uniform B1+ source [6]. Instead, the circularly polarized (CP) mode of a birdcage coil is often used to approximate a uniform field [7].

We simulated the CP-mode of a 16 rung body coil (40 cm diameter) loaded with the Duke human body model (2×2×2mm3, [8]) at resonant frequencies corresponding to 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 Tesla [9]. At 7 Tesla, we also extracted the two linear modes corresponding to each of the drive points in the coil. Each of the tissues in the body model were assigned literature T1, T2 and PD values corresponding to 1.5 Tesla [10,11]. Although T1 and T2 values are field strength dependent, in this work we kept the values constant to better visualize the impact of B1+ field heterogeneities on the reconstructed quantitative maps.

The extended phase graph formulism [12] was used to perform synthetic MR experiments in an axial slice through the abdomen using the simulated B1+ fields. The MRF sequence design and reconstruction was performed as described by Ma, et al [2]. At 7 Tesla, the two linear-modes of the body coil were used to create a synthetic PnP-PTX experiment through the same slice. The PnP-PTX sequence design and reconstruction was performed as described by Cloos, et al [5].

Results & Discussion

Figure 1 shows the B1+ field distribution of the CP-mode an axial slice in the abdomen at 3 different field strengths. As the field strength increased from 1.5 to 3.0 Tesla characteristic B1+ depressions, often observed in large subjects [13], are formed in the anterior and posterior areas of the body. Nevertheless, the fidelity of the adiabatic inversion [14] used at the start of MRF sequence remains excellent (Fig. 2), and the T1-maps reconstructed using MRF remain accurate (Fig. 3, middle row). The T2-maps, on the other hand, already show significant deviations from the ground truth at 1.5 Tesla. The T2 values in the left and right kidney, for example, are radically different. Comparing the B1+ field distributions with the PD maps (Fig. 3, top row), it is clear that the B1+ distribution is directly imposed on the PD map.

At 7 Tesla, the aforementioned RF-depressions grow out to form RF-voids (Fig. 1, right), which cannot be mitigated using an adiabatic pulse (Fig. 2 right). As a result, the reconstructed T1-map shows strong artifacts in those areas. These same imperfections in the inversion pulse also propagate into the T2 and PD map which are heavily distorted. While it is possible to leverage a dedicated B1 calibration scan to correct the distortions produced by the mild B1+ non-uniformities observed at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla [15], it is impossible to extract a viable signal from areas which are devoid, of RF such those shown here at 7.0 Tesla.

Figure 4 shows the decomposition of the CP-mode into the two linear modes. Although each of these modes is more heterogeneous than the CP-mode, their field patterns have a complementary distribution. Areas that are devoid of RF in one mode, are exposed by the other. Instead of relaying on an adiabatic pulse and relatively uniform field distributions, the PnP-PTX sequence interweaves these modes to extract signal from all areas through the slice making it possible to perform accurate measurements in challenging situations such as the abdomen at 7 Tesla (Fig. 5). In this proof of principle demonstration, we used the two linear modes because these are directly accessible in a birdcage coil. However, other coil-mode configurations may offer additional advantages.

Conclusion

Research systems operating at 7 Tesla predominantly focus on brain and extremity imaging because of the extreme RF non-uniformities encountered in the body. We showed that PnP-PTX has the potential to alleviate these challenges, and thereby opening up a new route towards robust, quantitative, whole-body MRI for ultra-high-field systems.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by NIH R21 EB020096 and NIH R01 EB011551 and was performed under the rubric of the Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R, www.cai2r.net), a NIBIB Biomedical Technology Resource Center (NIH P41 EB017183).

References

[1] Bernstein, M.A., King, K.F. & Zhou, X.J. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Academic Press (2004).

[2] Ma, D., et al. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature, 495(7440):187–192 (2013).

[3] Jiang, Y., Ma, D., Seiberlich, N., Gulani, V., & Griswold, M. A. (2014). MR fingerprinting using fast imaging with steady state precession (FISP) with spiral readout. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, n/a–n/a. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25559

[4] Cloos, M.A., Wiggins, C.J., Wiggins, G.C. & Sodickson, D.K. Plug and Play Parallel Transmission based on principles of MR Fingerprinting at 7 and 9.4 Tesla. 22th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. Milan, Italy, #542 (2014).

[5] Cloos MA, et al., Magnetic Resonance Fingerprint Compression. 23th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. Toronto, Canada, #330 (2015).

[6] Hoult, D.I. Sensitivity and Power Deposition in a High-Field Imaging Experiment. J Magn Reson Imaging, 12(1):46–67 (2000).

[7] Hayes, C.E., Edelstein, W.A. & Schenck, J.F. An efficient, highly homogeneous radiofrequency coil for whole-body NMR imaging at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson, 63(3):622–628 (1985).

[8] Christ A, Kainz W, Hahn EG, et al. The virtual family - development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations. Phys Med Biol. 55:N23–N38 (2010).

[9] CST Microwave Studio, Darmstadt, Germany.

[10] Stanisz, G. J., Odrobina, E. E., Pun, J., Escaravage, M., Graham, S. J., Bronskill, M. J., & Henkelman, R. M. T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 54(3), 507–512 (2005).

[11] Bazelaire, C.M.J., Duhamel, G.D., Rofsky, N.M., & Alsop, D.C. MR Imaging Relaxation Times of Abdominal and Pelvic Tissues Measured in Vivo at 3.0 T: Preliminary Results. Radiology 230:652–659 (2004).

[12] Weigel, M. Extended phase graphs: Dephasing, RF pulses, and echoes - pure and simple. J Magn Reson Imaging, 41(2):266–295 (2014).

[13] Bernstein, M.A., Huston, J. & Ward, H.A. Imaging artifacts at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging, 24(4):735– 746 (2006).

[14] Silver, M.S., Joseph, R.I., & Hoult, D.I., Selective spin inversion in nuclear magnetic resonance and coherent optics through an exact solution of the Bloch–Riccati equation. Phys. Rev. A 31, 2753–2755 (1985).

[15] Chen, Y., et al., Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) for rapid quantitative abdominal imaging. 22th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. Milan, Italy, #561 (2014).

Figures

Figure 1: Plots of the B1+ field distribution produced by a circularly polarized birdcage coil tuned to the Larmor frequencies used at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 Tesla MRI. In sub-figure shows same slice through the abdomen plotted using the same color scale.

Figure 2: Plots of the inversion fidelity produced by a high power 10ms Hyperbolic Secant adiabatic pulse using the circularly polarized birdcage coil tuned to the Larmor frequencies used at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 Tesla MRI. In sub-figure shows same slice through the abdomen plotted using the same color scale.

Figure 3: PD (top row), T1 (center row) and T2 (bottom row) maps reconstructed using MRF at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 Tesla (right 3 columns respectively) compared to the ground truth model (left column). Each sub-figure shows same slice through the abdomen. Every row is plotted using the same color scale.

Figure 4: Decomposition of the CP-mode (shown example 7 Tesla) into its two linear components.

Figure 5A: PD (top row), T1 (center row) and T2 (bottom row) maps reconstructed using PnP-PTX 7.0 Tesla (right column) compared to the ground truth model (left column). Each sub-figure shows same slice through the abdomen. Every row is plotted using the same color scale. Figure 5B: The two B1+ maps corresponding to the linear modes as reconstructed using PnP-PTX.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0740