Diane van Rappard1, Antoine Klauser2, Marjan Steenweg1, Marjo van der Knaap1, Nicole Wolf1, and Petra Pouwels3
1Child Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland, 3Physics & Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Synopsis
Currently, hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation (HSCT) is the only treatment
option for patients with metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD). This study in
MLD patients and controls investigated the possible additional prognostic value
of quantitative MRSI. In WM (consisting of lesions and NAWM), ratios of Cho/NAA
and Ins/NAA were significantly higher in patients who were considered non-eligible for HSCT than in eligible patients. Follow-up
of successfully treated patients showed partial normalization of concentrations
and ratios.
This
study suggests that quantitative MRS can support the decision whom to treat,
especially when neurological and cognitive examinations are ambiguous.Introduction
Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is an inherited lysosomal disorder caused by
recessive mutations in the ARSA gene.
1
Consequently, sulfatides accumulate in the central and peripheral nervous
system, eventually resulting in demyelination.
1
Onset is from infancy to adulthood, with the late-infantile form starting
before 30 months, the juvenile form before 16 years and the adult form from 16
years of age. In affected white matter (WM) in MLD patients, spectra
are characterized by a reduced NAA and elevated Cho and Ins – such that ratios
Cho/NAA and Ins/NAA are sensitive markers of disease status.
2,3 Hematopoietic
stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is at present the best treatment option, once
performed in an early stage of the disease and mainly for patients with the
juvenile and adult onset type.
4 Currently, the decision whether
patients are eligible for HSCT is based on neurological examination and
cognitive function. This study investigates the possible additional prognostic
value of quantitative MRSI. HSCT treated patients were examined longitudinally
to obtain quantitative information about the long term effects.
Methods
23 MLD patients (demographics in Table 1) and 20 control subjects were
examined at 1.5T (Siemens Sonata, Erlangen,
Germany) using
the 8-channel phased-array head coil. Twelve patients were considered eligible
for transplantation, 11 were not eligible.
MRI included 3D T1 and axial FLAIR images. 2D PRESS
MRSI (TR/TE 3000/30 ms) was obtained in a transverse oblique 15 mm slab
centered onto the corpus callosum.5 All spectra within
the VOI were quantified using LCModel.5,6
The following procedure was applied to obtain
tissue-specific metabolite concentrations as illustrated in Figure 1: Lesions
were outlined and quantified on FLAIR using the semi-automatic tool clusterize7
and registered to 3D T1. Lesion-filled 3D T1 images were segmented with FSL’s
SIENAX into frontal and parietal GM and WM. Combination of MRSI voxels and
tissue partial volume estimates within a linear model allowed to extrapolate the
pure tissue concentrations, resulting in concentrations in frontal and parietal
GM, in WM, and in NAWM and lesions separately.
Statistical analysis was performed with a general
linear model, including age as covariate. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Comparison between patients and controls at
baseline
WM spectra of patients who were considered not
eligible for HSCT were characterized by low NAA, high Cho and Ins, and presence
of Lac, whereas the spectra of patients who were considered eligible had much
milder abnormalities in comparison to controls (Figure 2). Quantitative
analysis showed that in WM (NAWM +lesions) NAA was lower in all patient groups
than in controls, especially in the non-eligible patients (Table 2). Ins did
not differ between patient groups, but was higher than in controls. Cho was
variable among groups, with even lower concentrations in the non-eligible than
in the eligible patients, probably due to a decrease of cell density (also
evidenced by reduced Cr).
The concentration ratios Cho/NAA and Ins/NAA
were significantly higher in non-eligible patients than in eligible patients,
not only in overall WM, but also in NAWM.
In lesions, the differences were only trend-significant due to the large
variability in this tissue type.
Baseline and longitudinal values of Cho/NAA and
Ins/NAA in WM in all patients are shown in Figure 3.
Remarkably, one adult patient who was considered
not eligible for HSCT had relatively low ratios Cho/NAA and Ins/NAA within the
range of eligible patients (see also Figure 3).
Monitoring patients after HSCT
Thirteen patients received HSCT: 11 out of 12
eligible patients (one eligible patient was not transplanted for personal
reasons), and two of the non-eligible patients (after careful consideration and
discussions with parents). The latter patients and one eligible late-infantile
patient died within one year after HSCT. Follow-up data were available for two of them,
and demonstrated an increase in Ins/NAA and especially Cho/NAA compared to
their baseline values (Figure 3, red symbols).
In
all ten surviving patients, Cho/NAA and Ins/NAA ratios remained stable after
treatment or even improved, approaching normal values.
Discussion and conclusion
At diagnosis, patients who were not eligible for HSCT according to their
neurological and cognitive status had significantly higher ratios of Cho/NAA
and Ins/NAA in WM than eligible patients. In the latter patient group,
metabolite concentrations were closer to normal.
Strikingly, follow-up of successfully treated patients showed partial
normalization of concentrations and ratios. This study suggests that
quantitative MRS can support the decision whom to treat, especially when
neurological and cognitive examinations are ambiguous.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Biffi A, Lucchini G, Rovelli A,
Sessa M. Metachromatic leukodystrophy: an overview of current and prospective
treatments. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008;42 Suppl2:S2-S6.
2. Kingsley PB, Shah
TC, Woldenberg R. Identification of diffuse and focal brain lesions by clinical
magnetic resonance spectroscopy. NMR Biomed 2006;19(4):435-462.
3. Kruse B, Hanefeld F,
Christen HJ et al. Alterations of brain metabolites in metachromatic leukodystrophy
as detected by localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vivo. J
Neurol 1993;241(2):68-74.
4. van Egmond ME, Pouwels PJ,
Boelens JJ et al. Improvement of white matter changes
on neuroimaging modalities after stem cell transplant in metachromatic
leukodystrophy. JAMA Neurol 2013;70(6):779-782.
5. Wiebenga OT, Klauser AM, Nagtegaal
GJ et al. Longitudinal absolute metabolite quantification of white and gray matter regions in
healthy controls using protonMR spectroscopic imaging. NMR Biomed 2014; 27(1):304-311.
6. Provencher SW.
Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR
spectra. Magn Reson Med 1993;30(6):672-679.
7.
Clas P, Groeschel
S, Wilke M. A semi-automatic algorithm for determining the demyelination load
in metachromatic leukodystrophy. Acad Radiol 2012;19(1):26-34.