Philippe Garteiser1, Sabrina Doblas1, Jean-Baptiste Cavin1, André Bado1, Vinciane Rebours1,2, Maude Le Gall1, Anne Couvelard1,3, and Bernard E Van Beers1,4
1Center For Research on Inflammation, Inserm U1149, Paris, France, 2Pancreatology Unit, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France, 3Pathology department, AP-HP, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France, 4Radiology department, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
Synopsis
Multiparametric assessment of pancreas in the obese rat was used to evaluate alterations linked to obesity-mediated inflammation. Mechanical properties and T2* values are significantly affected by disease, and reflect accurately the histological features of the obese pancreas.Purpose
Obesity is
often linked to hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, and this low grade
inflammatory condition is tightly associated to type 2 diabetes(1). As the main
insulin-secreting organ in the body, the pancreas is an important target for
disease assessment in obesity(2). In obesity, pancreas is the siege of fatty
infiltration and fibrosis(3), all of which are risk factors for ductal
adenocarcinoma(4). The associated hyperinsulinemia is accompanied with structural
remodeling in the form of beta cell islets hyperplasia(5)(6). In the present
study we sought to evaluate, using high field MRI, the effect of obesity on
fibrosis, inflammation, fat content and general microstructural architecture in pancreas explants from healthy vs. diet-induced obese Wistar rats.
Methods:
All animal
experiments were performed in accordance with local institutional ethics
committee approval. Male Wistar rats where assigned to high fat diet (obese
group n=8) or normal diet (control group n=6) for six month and sacrificed. The
pancreas tissue was then dissected from the surrounding intraperitoneal adipose
tissue and maintained in physiological serum. Pancreas explants were
immobilized on a custom-made MRE actuating cradle.
MRE: MRE was performed using a spin echo sequence
with motion encoding gradients played sequentially along the three dimensions.
To accommodate the softness of pancreatic tissue(7), relatively low frequencies
of 400Hz, 600Hz and 800Hz were selected, and each was assessed at 4 mechanical
offsets per cycle. Acquisition parameters were TR/TE of 1000ms/18ms, allowing
1, 2 or 6 periods of motion encoding, and 300µm isotropic resolution.
Viscoelastic parameters (storage modulus, G' and loss modulus, G'' at all three
frequencies, and their frequency dependence, γ, expressed as the exponent of a fit to a power
law) were obtained by algebraic inversion of the wave propagation equation,
applied to the shear components of the displacements recorded on unwrapped
phase images.
T2* and fat fraction: acquisition consisted of a gradient
echo sequence (TE=1.65ms+n·0.92ms, n=0···15) with 250µm in-plane resolution,
1mm slice thickness, 300kHz bandwidth, 950ms TR, 15° flip angle and 4 signal
averages. T2* and fat fraction were extracted by fitting the magnitude image to
a model accounting for T2* decay and signal interferences from water and the 7
most abundant lipid peaks.
Diffusion: Diffusion-weighted imaging was done with a
spin echo sequence with 21 segments EPI readout, 4 b-values (0, 150, 300, 500
and 700 s/mm²), 195µm in-plane resolution, 400µm slice thickness, 2000ms/20ms
TR/TE, and 3 signal averages).
Histology: Reference histological results were obtained
with hematoxylin-eosin-saffron staining (for determination of presence or
absence of adipocytes and numeration of endo-exo fibrous complexes). Perls
staining was used to determine the percent surface area occupied by iron
depots.
Results
At the sacrifice,
Rats from obese group weighted 863±141g and rats from control group weighted
586±42g.
MRE: Storage modulus was positively correlated to
the number of fibrous complexes (r=0.63, p=0.02 and r=0.66, p=0.014, at 400Hz
and 600Hz respectively), and were significantly higher in the obese group than
in controls (400Hz: 0.87±0.07kPa vs. 0.57±0.06kPa, p<0.01; 600Hz:
1.63±0.12kPa vs. 1.16±0.07kPa, p<0.01). Storage modulus at 800Hz, and loss
modulus at any frequencies were not significantly different between groups and
were not significantly correlated to the number of fibrous complexes. The
slopes of the frequency response for storage and loss moduli (γG' and γG'',
respectively) were lower in the pancreas from obese group than from controls,
but this difference was only significant for the slope of the storage modulus
(1.69±0.14 vs. 1.25±0.05 for the control and obese groups, respectively,
p<0.01). Furthermore, the slopes were negatively correlated to the number of
fibrous complexes (r=-0.25 and r=-0.58 for γG' and γG''), and this correlation
was significant in the case of γG'' (p<0.05).
T2* and fat fraction: The pancreas from the obese group
had higher fat content (0.36±0.19 %) and shorter T2* (8.16±0.58 ms) than those from
the control group (PDFF: 0.0024±0.0016 %, p<0.05; T2*: 12.44±0.74, p<0.001).
Diffusion: The diffusion coefficients ADC (0.75±0.03 and
0.81±0.07) and D (0.73±0.03 and 0.78±0.06) for obeses and controls,
respectively, were not significantly different between groups. Both for ADC and
D, the average values in the obese group were lower than in the controls.
Conclusion
Multiparametric
assessment of pancreas explants from obese rats revealed a higher elasticity, a
lower frequency response, an enhanced fat content, an enhanced R2* and a slightly
lower diffusion coefficient in the pancreas of obese rats relative to controls.
These findings were in agreement and reasonably well explained with
quantitative and qualitative histologic markers of iron deposition, fibrotic and
inflammatory signs. Multiparametric MRI is proposed as an important tool in the
evaluation of obesity mediated disorders of the pancreas.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Esser N,
Legrand-Poels S, Piette J, Scheen AJ, Paquot N. Inflammation as a link between
obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract.
2014;105:141–150.
2. Macauley
M, Percival K, Thelwall PE, Hollingsworth KG, Taylor R. Altered volume,
morphology and composition of the pancreas in type 2 diabetes. PloS One. 2015;10:e0126825.
3. Rebours V, Gaujoux S, d’Assignies G,
et al. Obesity and Fatty Pancreatic Infiltration Are Risk
Factors for Pancreatic Precancerous Lesions (PanIN). Clin Cancer Res Off J Am
Assoc Cancer Res. 2015;21:3522–3528.
4. Tomita
Y, Azuma K, Nonaka Y, et al. Pancreatic fatty degeneration and fibrosis as
predisposing factors for the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Pancreas. 2014;43:1032–1041.
5. Singh
H, Ganneru S, Malakapalli V, et al. Islet adaptation to obesity and insulin
resistance in WNIN/GR-Ob rats. Islets.
2014;6:e998099.
6. Venkatesan V, Madhira SL, Malakapalli
VM, et al. Obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome: a
study in WNIN/Ob rats from a pancreatic perspective. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:617569.
7. Shi
Y, Glaser KJ, Venkatesh SK, Ben-Abraham EI, Ehman RL. Feasibility of using 3D
MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI.
2015;41:369–375.