Frequency tensor imaging (FTI) at a single orientation by vector projection
Luke Xie1, Russell Dibb2, Chunlei Liu2, and Vivian S. Lee1

1Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 2Brain Imaging Analysis Center, Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States

Synopsis

STI is sensitive to tissue microstructure and can detect subtle changes in disease states. However, STI remains a challenging protocol due to the physical reorientation with respect to the magnetic field. Current studies of the heart and kidney are limited to ex-vivo imaging. In this study, we present frequency tensor imaging (FTI) at a single image acquisition without rotating the object. FTI takes advantage of tissue structure already pointing in multiple directions with respect to the magnetic field in a single orientation dataset. This technique offers the potential for susceptibility-based tensor imaging of the abdomen in the clinic.

Introduction

Recently studies have demonstrated the utility of susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) in the brain, heart, and kidney (1-3). STI can characterize more subtle changes compared to DTI, for example, in white matter demyelination and nephron epithelial damage (4,5). However, STI remains a challenging protocol due to the requirement of physical reorientation with respect to the magnetic field. Advances in the field have reduced the number of orientations to three by assuming cylindrical symmetry (6,7). STI for the abdomen, even with three orientations, can be particularly challenging. Current studies of the kidney and heart are limited to ex-vivo imaging. In this study, we present a method to compute frequency tensor imaging (FTI) at a single image acquisition without rotating the object. FTI takes advantage of tissue structure already pointing in multiple directions with respect to the magnetic field in a single orientation dataset. Here, we use the image structure tensor as a prior to determine the directions of tissue structure. This technique offers the potential for susceptibility based tensor imaging of the abdomen in the clinic.

Methods

C57Bl/6 mouse (4 months) was perfusion fixed. Kidneys were excised and immersed in 2.5 mM ProHance. The specimen was placed in a sphere to facilitate multiple orientations for STI. A single orientation dataset was used for FTI. Images were acquired using 3D multi-echo GRE at 9.4T with these parameters: TR=50 ms, TE1/ΔTE/TEn=3.4/2.9/17.9 ms, FA=50°, resolution=55×55×55 μm3, STI directions=12, acquisition time=12 hours (STI) and 1 hour (FTI).

Each echo phase was unwrapped and background removed using a Laplacian and V-SHARP algorithm (8). The resultant frequency maps were echo summed to create an enhanced frequency map. The 12 frequency maps were used to calculate STI following (9).

The structure tensor (S) for each pixel was computed as the outer product of the image gradient vectors:

$$ S=\left( \begin{array}{ccc}f_x^2 & f_x\cdot f_y & f_x\cdot f_z \\f_x\cdot f_y & f_y^2 & f_y\cdot f_z \\f_x\cdot f_z & f_y\cdot f_z & f_z^2 \end{array} \right) $$

where $$$f_x=g_{x,\sigma}\star f(x,y,z)$$$, $$$f_y=g_{y,\sigma}\star f(x,y,z)$$$, and $$$f_z=g_{z,\sigma}\star f(x,y,z)$$$. The major eigenvectors from the structure tensor was used for vector projection. Candidate vectors were projected onto a target vector based on distance and angle (Fig. 1). The distance threshold was 3 pixels within the radial length from seed point to target point. The angle threshold was >25° between candidate vector and target vector. A maximum of 200 vectors were projected. Each pixel then has a matrix of frequency values and magnetic field unit vectors based on the vector transformation.

The frequency tensor (F) was calculated from frequency values at projected orientations (i = 1, 2, …, 200) following:

$$\bf f_i=\bf \hat{h}_i^T F \bf \hat{h}_i$$

where f is the frequency value and $$$\bf \hat{h}$$$ is the magnetic field unit vector. Since F is symmetric, it can be rewritten as six independent tensor elements (F11 F12 F13 F22 F23 F33). Tractography from structure tensor, STI, and FTI were performed using TrackVis.

Results

The enhanced frequency map is shown in Fig. 2. The inset displays the structure tensor eigenvectors used for vector projections. The outer medulla was focused because of the wide range of vector orientations with respect to the magnetic field. Tractography results are shown in Fig. 3. The structure tensor tracks accurately span from the anteroposterior directions (red arrows) to the mediolateral direction (blue arrow). Similarly, FTI tracks cover the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions of kidney tubules. On the other hand, STI tracks are most coherent mediolaterally and less coherent anteroposteriorly.

Discussion and conclusion

In this work, we demonstrate the feasibility of FTI at a single orientation. Structure tensor was used to estimate tubular directions. While the structure tensor produced the most coherent tracks, it is based on image intensities and does not provide the frequency information sensitive to local microstructure. For instance, one study demonstrated that renal tubules were visible in the magnitude images, however, STI tractography were virtually absent due to damages in the tubular walls (5). FTI assumes radial symmetry from a seed point and treats nephron segments from pole to pole as being homogenous in structure and composition. It treats nephron segments along the tubule as being distinct where tubular vectors are not projected or shared. Renal injuries can be more specific to nephron segments along the tubule than to the same segments in neighboring tubules (10). Most importantly, the resultant FTI shows sensitivity to the frequency information of tubules at varying orientations with respect to the magnetic field. FTI rids of the major challenge of performing multiple orientations and significantly reduces the acquisition time needed to calculate a susceptibility based tensor image.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Dibb R, Qi Y, Liu C. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of myocardium imaged by cardiovascular magnetic resonance reflects the anisotropy of myocardial filament alpha-helix polypeptide bonds. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:60.

2. Liu C, Li W, Wu B, Jiang Y, Johnson GA. 3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging. NeuroImage 2012;59(2):1290-1298.

3. Xie L, Dibb R, Cofer GP, Li W, Nicholls PJ, Johnson GA, Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging of the kidney and its microstructural underpinnings. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2015;73(3):1270-1281.

4. Liu C, Li W, Johnson GA, Wu B. High-field (9.4 T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility. NeuroImage 2011;56(3):930-938.

5. Xie L, Dibb R, Gurley S, Liu C, Johnson G. Susceptibility tensor imaging reveals reduced anisotropy in renal nephropathy. 2015; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. p 0463.

6. Li X, Vikram DS, Lim IA, Jones CK, Farrell JA, van Zijl PC. Mapping magnetic susceptibility anisotropies of white matter in vivo in the human brain at 7 T. NeuroImage 2012;62(1):314-330.

7. Wisnieff C, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Wang S, Zhou D, Wang Y. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy: cylindrical symmetry from macroscopically ordered anisotropic molecules and accuracy of MRI measurements using few orientations. NeuroImage 2013;70:363-376.

8. Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. NeuroImage 2011;55(4):1645-1656.

9. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2010;63(6):1471-1477.

10. Glaumann B, Glaumann H, Trump BF. Studies of cellular recovery from injury. III. Ultrastructural studies on the recovery of the pars recta of the proximal tubule (P3 segment) of the rat kidney from temporary ischemia. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol 1977;25(4):281-308.

Figures

Fig. 1. Concept diagram of vector projection for frequency tensor imaging. Red vectors are selected based on distance from seed point and angle from target vector. These vectors are projected onto the direction of the green target vector. Similarly, blue vectors are projected towards the orange target vector.

Fig. 2. Summed frequency image used for frequency tensor imaging (FTI). Inset shows major eigenvectors (cyan) from the structure tensor.

Fig. 3. Comparison of tractography in the renal outer medulla. Frequency tensor imaging (FTI) tracks at the ends of the outer medulla point correctly towards the anteroposterior direction (red arrows). Susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) and FTI tracks at the center of the medulla point correctly towards the mediolateral direction (blue arrows). ML=mediolateral, DV=dorsoventral, AP=anteroposterior.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0705