Synopsis
STI is sensitive to tissue
microstructure and can detect subtle changes in disease states. However, STI
remains a challenging protocol due to the physical reorientation with respect
to the magnetic field. Current studies of the heart and kidney are limited to ex-vivo imaging. In this study, we
present frequency tensor imaging (FTI) at a single image acquisition without
rotating the object. FTI takes advantage of tissue structure already pointing
in multiple directions with respect to the magnetic field in a single
orientation dataset. This technique offers the potential for susceptibility-based
tensor imaging of the abdomen in the clinic.Introduction
Recently studies have demonstrated the utility
of susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) in the brain, heart, and kidney (1-3). STI
can characterize more subtle changes compared to DTI, for example, in white
matter demyelination and nephron epithelial damage (4,5).
However, STI remains a challenging protocol due to the requirement of physical
reorientation with respect to the magnetic field. Advances in the field have
reduced the number of orientations to three by assuming cylindrical symmetry (6,7). STI
for the abdomen, even with three orientations, can be particularly challenging.
Current studies of the kidney and heart are limited to
ex-vivo imaging. In this study, we present a method to compute
frequency tensor imaging (FTI) at a single image acquisition without rotating
the object. FTI takes advantage of tissue structure already pointing in multiple
directions with respect to the magnetic field in a single orientation dataset. Here,
we use the image structure tensor as a prior to determine the directions of tissue
structure. This technique offers the potential for susceptibility based tensor
imaging of the abdomen in the clinic.
Methods
C57Bl/6
mouse (4 months) was perfusion fixed. Kidneys were excised and immersed in
2.5 mM ProHance. The specimen was placed in a sphere to facilitate multiple
orientations for STI. A single orientation dataset was used for FTI. Images
were acquired using 3D multi-echo GRE at 9.4T with these parameters: TR=50 ms,
TE1/ΔTE/TEn=3.4/2.9/17.9 ms, FA=50°, resolution=55×55×55
μm3, STI directions=12, acquisition time=12 hours (STI) and 1 hour
(FTI).
Each echo phase was unwrapped and background removed using a Laplacian and V-SHARP
algorithm (8). The resultant frequency maps were echo summed to
create an enhanced frequency map. The 12 frequency maps were used to calculate
STI following (9).
The structure tensor (S) for each pixel was computed as the outer product of the image gradient
vectors:
$$ S=\left( \begin{array}{ccc}f_x^2 & f_x\cdot f_y & f_x\cdot f_z \\f_x\cdot f_y & f_y^2 & f_y\cdot f_z \\f_x\cdot f_z & f_y\cdot f_z & f_z^2 \end{array} \right) $$
where $$$f_x=g_{x,\sigma}\star f(x,y,z)$$$, $$$f_y=g_{y,\sigma}\star f(x,y,z)$$$, and $$$f_z=g_{z,\sigma}\star f(x,y,z)$$$.
The major eigenvectors from the structure tensor
was used for vector projection. Candidate vectors were projected onto a target vector based on distance and angle (Fig. 1). The distance
threshold was 3 pixels within the radial length from seed point to target
point. The angle threshold was >25° between candidate vector and target
vector. A maximum of 200 vectors were projected. Each pixel then has a matrix
of frequency values and magnetic field unit vectors based on the vector transformation.
The frequency tensor (F) was calculated from frequency values at projected orientations (i = 1, 2, …, 200) following:
$$\bf f_i=\bf \hat{h}_i^T F \bf \hat{h}_i$$
where f
is the frequency value and $$$\bf \hat{h}$$$ is the magnetic
field unit vector. Since F is
symmetric, it can be rewritten as six independent tensor elements (F11 F12 F13
F22 F23 F33).
Tractography from structure tensor, STI, and FTI were performed using TrackVis.
Results
The enhanced frequency map is shown in Fig. 2.
The inset displays the structure tensor eigenvectors used for vector
projections. The outer medulla was focused because of the wide range of vector
orientations with respect to the magnetic field. Tractography results are shown
in Fig. 3. The structure tensor tracks accurately span from the anteroposterior
directions (red arrows) to the mediolateral direction (blue arrow). Similarly,
FTI tracks cover the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions of kidney
tubules. On the other hand, STI tracks are most coherent mediolaterally and
less coherent anteroposteriorly.
Discussion and conclusion
In
this work, we demonstrate the feasibility of FTI at a single orientation. Structure
tensor was used to estimate tubular directions. While the structure tensor
produced the most coherent tracks, it is based on image intensities and does
not provide the frequency information sensitive to local microstructure. For
instance, one study demonstrated that renal tubules were visible in the
magnitude images, however, STI tractography were virtually absent due to damages
in the tubular walls (5). FTI assumes radial symmetry from a seed point and treats
nephron segments from pole to pole as being homogenous in structure and
composition. It treats nephron segments along the tubule as being distinct
where tubular vectors are not projected or shared. Renal injuries can be more
specific to nephron segments along the tubule than to the same segments in
neighboring tubules (10). Most importantly, the resultant FTI shows sensitivity
to the frequency information of tubules at varying orientations with respect to
the magnetic field. FTI rids of the major challenge of performing multiple
orientations and significantly reduces the acquisition time needed to calculate
a susceptibility based tensor image.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Dibb R, Qi Y, Liu C. Magnetic
susceptibility anisotropy of myocardium imaged by cardiovascular magnetic
resonance reflects the anisotropy of myocardial filament alpha-helix
polypeptide bonds. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:60.
2. Liu C, Li W, Wu B, Jiang Y, Johnson GA.
3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging. NeuroImage
2012;59(2):1290-1298.
3. Xie L, Dibb R, Cofer GP, Li W, Nicholls
PJ, Johnson GA, Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging of the kidney and its
microstructural underpinnings. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official
journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 2015;73(3):1270-1281.
4. Liu C, Li W, Johnson GA, Wu B.
High-field (9.4 T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of
magnetic susceptibility. NeuroImage 2011;56(3):930-938.
5. Xie L, Dibb R, Gurley S, Liu C, Johnson
G. Susceptibility tensor imaging reveals reduced anisotropy in renal
nephropathy. 2015; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. p 0463.
6. Li X, Vikram DS, Lim IA, Jones CK,
Farrell JA, van Zijl PC. Mapping magnetic susceptibility anisotropies of white
matter in vivo in the human brain at 7 T. NeuroImage 2012;62(1):314-330.
7. Wisnieff C, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Wang
S, Zhou D, Wang Y. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy: cylindrical symmetry
from macroscopically ordered anisotropic molecules and accuracy of MRI
measurements using few orientations. NeuroImage 2013;70:363-376.
8. Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative
susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue
composition. NeuroImage 2011;55(4):1645-1656.
9. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging.
Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2010;63(6):1471-1477.
10. Glaumann B, Glaumann H, Trump BF. Studies
of cellular recovery from injury. III. Ultrastructural studies on the recovery
of the pars recta of the proximal tubule (P3 segment) of the rat kidney from
temporary ischemia. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol 1977;25(4):281-308.