Multiresolution imaging using golden angle stack-of-stars and compressed sensing
Abhishek Pandey1,2, Umit Yoruk3, Puneet Sharma1, Diego R. Martin1, Maria Altbach1, Ali Bilgin1,2,4, and Manojkumar Saranathan1,4

1Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, 2Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, 3Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 4Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States

Synopsis

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI requires measurement of arterial input function with great accuracy while maintaining high spatial resolution. Golden angle stack-of-stars radial acquisition was used to get reconstructions at multiple temporal resolutions. A multiresolution reconstruction scheme is used to generate AIFs using a very small temporal window. The accuracy of the reconstruction method was checked on a realistic phantom and then applied to an in vivo data. Results show that compressed sensing reconstruction works best with high temporal resolution (HTR) AIF giving both diagnostic image quality and accurate GFR estimate.

Introduction

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI involves tradeoffs between spatial and temporal resolution. High temporal resolution (TRES) is needed to capture the arterial phase or accurately measure the arterial input function (AIF) while high spatial resolution is needed for diagnostic quality images. The golden angle radial stack-of-stars trajectory is a flexible, motion robust acquisition scheme that has been used for liver imaging [1]. We used a multiresolution compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction scheme: AIFs were generated using a very small temporal window while dynamic data were reconstructed with larger temporal window for high spatial resolution. We validated the accuracy of the reconstruction method on a realistic phantom and then applied it to in vivo data.

Method

Phantom validation: Validation was performed on a synthetic phantom proposed by Yoruk et al. [2], where the true AIF, kep (1.5) and GFR (74 ml/min) are known a priori. The phantom was synthesized from a dynamic contrast enhanced MRI dataset acquired on a pediatric patient with 4s TRES. An aortic enhancement curve with 1s temporal resolution were then fused in and a new data set created using interpolation. The k-space data was then sampled using a golden angle stack-of-stars radial trajectory.

Reconstruction schemes: Dynamic MRI data were reconstructed at different temporal resolutions ranging from 1s to 12s using a sliding window. A high temporal resolution (HTR) AIF was generated using a 1s temporal window and Non Uniform Fourier Transform (NUFFT), followed by a 5-point moving average filter to reduce noise (Figure 1). For each TRES, three different reconstruction methods were performed: 1) NUFFT reconstruction with AIF estimated from the reconstructed data 2) NUFFT with the 1s temporal resolution HTR-AIF 3) Compressed Sensing reconstruction [1] with Total Variation sparsity constraint applied across the temporal dimension $$x = \underset{x} {\mathrm{argmin}}\left|\left|F.C.x-k\right|\right|_2^2+\lambda\left|\left|TV(x)\right|\right|_1$$ and using the HTR-AIF. After creating cortical and aortic ROIs, GFR and kep estimates were computed for the cortical ROIs using a 3-compartment model [3] for each of the three schemes.

The three schemes were also used on in vivo datasets for GFR estimation. Imaging was performed on a 3T MRI scanner (Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Malvern, PA) using a radial golden angle stack-of-stars spoiled gradient echo pulse sequence on abdominal imaging patients, after informed consent. Acquisition parameters: TR = 3.52 ms; TE = 1.5 ms; FOV = 38 cm; flip angle = 10; receiver bandwidth=1565 Hz/pixel; acquisition matrix=288x288x44; 1.3x1.3 in-plane spatial resolution and 3 mm thick slices to achieve whole abdomen coverage. Free breathing data were acquired for 90s following injection of Gadolinium contrast.

Result

Figure 2 shows NUFFT reconstructed images of the synthetic phantom for TRES of 4s (a) and 12s (b). CS reconstructed images for TRES of 1s (c) and 4s (d) are also shown. The superior image quality of the CS reconstruction and lack of streaking artifacts is apparent. CS can increase the TRES by at least 3X without compromising spatial resolution or image quality.

Table 1 reports errors in GFR and kep estimates for all three reconstruction schemes for the phantom with TRES of 1s, 4s and 12s. There is a tradeoff between spatial and temporal resolution and the GFR/ kep estimates are most accurate for midrange TRES (4s). It can be seen that the GFR estimates are poor for the NUFFT case for all TRES (top row). While HTR-AIF with 1s TRES improves the GFR estimates for the NUFFT (middle row), the image quality is still poor (Fig 2a-b). The CS reconstruction with HTR-AIF (bottom row) achieves both accurate GFR and kep estimates as well as diagnostic image quality with 4s TRES (Fig 2d).

Figure 3 shows pre-contrast (a), arterial/renal cortical (b) and renal medullary (c) phases from a 3D radial stack-of-star dataset acquired on a patient and reconstructed using 4s TRES CS reconstruction.The images are high quality with negligible artifacts compared to the 12s TRES NUFFT reconstruction (d), highlighting the usefulness of temporally constrained CS. Table 2 shows GFR estimates from an in vivo dataset, which follows the same trend as the phantom. The CS estimates are in line with expected GFR values for a normal kidney while the CS reconstruction removes streaking artifacts still present in the NUFFT reconstruction (Fig 3d).

Conclusion

We have demonstrated the feasibility of multiresolution imaging using a radial stack-of-stars scheme to accurately estimate the AIF as well as produce diagnostic quality dynamic images in vivo. The high temporal resolution AIF estimate can significantly reduce errors in GFR estimation for free breathing dynamic MR urography. The same technique can also be used for pharmacokinetic modeling of breast, liver and prostate cancers.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] Feng, L., Grimm, R., Block, K. T., Chandarana, H., Kim, S., Xu, J., Axel, L., Sodickson, D. K. and Otazo, R. (2014), Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: Combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med, 72: 707–717. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24980

[2] Yoruk, U., Saranathan, M., Loening, A. M., Hargreaves, B. A. and Vasanawala, S. S. (2015), High temporal resolution dynamic MRI and arterial input function for assessment of GFR in pediatric subjects. Magn Reson Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25731

[3] Annet L, Hermoye L, Peeters F, Jamar F, Dehoux J-P, Van Beers BE. Glomerular filtration rate: assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and a cortical-compartment model in the rabbit kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20:843–849.

Figures

Figure 1. Comparison of True AIF (blue) with the proposed 1s temporal resolution HTR- AIF (red).

Figure 2. NUFFT reconstruction with 4s (a) and 12s (b) temporal resolution (TRES) compared with CS reconstruction with 4s (c) and 12s (d) TRES.

Table 1: Error in GFR and Kep estimates for 1) NUFFT 2) NUFFT + HTR-AIF 3) CS + HTR-AIF experiments performed on the synthetic phantom. 4 second TRES (green) CS + HTR-AIF GFR error compared to 12 second (red) TRES NUFFT GFR error.

Figure 3. Four-second TRES CS reconstruction of an in vivo dataset showing a) pre-contrast phase, b) arterial and renal cortical phases, and c) renal medullary phase. A 12s TRES NUFFT reconstruction renal medullary phase is also shown for comparison (d), showing the streaking artifacts, nicely eliminated using temporally constrained CS reconstruction (c).

Table 2: GFR estimates for NUFFT, NUFFT +HTR-AIF and CS + HTR-AIF reconstructions acquired on a patient referred for abdominal imaging.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0702