Stephen Edward Jones1, Hyun-Joo Park2, Pallab Bhattacharyya1, and Andre Machado2
1Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Neurologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
We present a new intra-operative MRI technique for evaluating placement of DBS electrodes in patients with movement disorders, using simultaneous electrical stimulation and fMRI. This technique can elicit a strong BOLD effect whose pattern can reflect underlying networks. There is strong spatial sensitivity of these patterns to electrode position, which is important for clinical utility in predicting clinical response and unwanted side-effects.Purpose
Deep brain stimulation for patients with movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease is now FDA approved treatment. While motor symptoms can be markedly improved, a drawback to this method is the production of non-motor side effects whose symptoms can overwhelm any benefits. The spatial sensitivity for optimal location of electrode contacts is within millimeters, and typically requires surgical implantation to be performed with the patient awake. However, many patients are adverse to awake neurosurgery, and there is a need for methods permitting accurate implantation with patients under anesthesia. Although some centers can perform such implantation based solely on anatomy, there is no information about functional location.
We describe a new method that addresses the need to functional information about DBS location in patients under general anesthesia, by using intra-operative fMRI while the DBS electrodes are electrically stimulated. This method is similar to one recently applied to epilepsy patients1,2, and extensive dedicated safety tests were performed beforehand. Another group has recently published similar results using different parameters3.
Methods
Patient were scanned in a IMRIS intra-operative MRI at 1.5T, during
DBS implantation while under general anesthesia. After electrode
insertion using anatomic guidance, the MRI was placed over the patient
and the electrodes connected to an external stimulator located in the
control room, via a long shielded cable. After acquisition of an
anatomic T1 sequence, a BOLD sensitive EPI sequence was acquired during
stimulation of the electrodes in a block design of 30 seconds on/off.
Stimulation parameters were 6 volts across bipolar contacts, at 130 Hz.
A total of up to 4-5 DBS-fMRI sequences were obtained during the imaging session, each with variations of stimulation parameters such as voltages, contacts, and duration. Analysis was performed using AFNI.
Results
A total of 6 patients have been studied and there have been no
adverse reactions. A variety of stimulation parameters were tested to
explore parameter space, generally showing robust BOLD activation with
voltages greater than 4 volts. Figure 1 shows maps of BOLD activation
resulting from stimulation of electrodes in the thalamus (ViM) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) in two patients with movement disorders. Both positive and negative
activation are demonstrated, which can be both proximal and distal to
the electrode contacts, and the patterns are distinct. Figure 2 shows similar maps in the same patient, demonstrating the spatial sensitivity of the BOLD maps depending on a slight change of the stimulation contacts. Figure 3 shows the BOLD maps for stimulation of the STN in two patients with a different clinical response to DBS stimulation (as determined several months after implantation): the patient with significant clinical response clearly shows a wider extension of BOLD activation compared to the patient with no significant clinical response. These results shows promise for using this technique to predict the clinical response after implantation, and is also sensitive to slight changes in stimulation location.
Conclusion
We present initial results from simultaneous stimulation of DBS
electrodes and fMRI, performed in a Parkinson's patients at 1.5T while
under general anesthesia. Robust BOLD activation can be easily elicited
at voltages greater than 4V, whose patterns are both proximal and
distal, with high spatial sensitivity, and whose patterns reflect clinical efficacy. This technique offers a possible alternative for patients wishing DBS
implantation while under general anesthesia, in which the
functional location of
electrodes is desired to maximize clinical response and minimize side effects.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. SE Jones, Zhang M,
Avitsian R, Bhattacharyya P, Bulacio J, Cendes F, Enatsu R, Lowe M, Najm
I, Nair D, Phillips M, Gonzalez-Martinez J. Functional magnetic resonance
imaging networks induced by intracranial stimulation may help defining the
epileptogenic zone. Brain Connect. 2014 May;4(4):286-98
2. SE Jones, Beall EB, Najm I, Sakaie KE, Phillips MD, Zhang M, Gonzalez-Martinez JA. Low consistency of four brain connectivity measures derived from intracranial electrode measurements. Front Neurol. 2014 Dec 19;5:272.
3. Knight EJ, Testini P, Min HK, Gibson WS, Gorny KR, Favazza CP,
Felmlee JP, Kim I, Welker KM, Clayton DA, Klassen BT, Chang SY,
Lee KH. Motor and Nonmotor Circuitry Activation Induced by Subthalamic Nucleus
Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Parkinson Disease:
Intraoperative Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Deep Brain
Stimulation. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Jun;90(6):773-85.