Jeff L. Zhang1, Christopher Hanrahan1, Christopher C. Conlin1, Corey Hart2, Gwenael Layec2, Kristi Carlston1, Daniel Kim1, Michelle Mueller3, and Vivian S. Lee1
1Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 2Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 3Vascular surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Synopsis
One major challenge for measuring exercise perfusion of skeletal muscle
with ASL is the potential heterogeneity of arterial transit time (ATT) across
the muscle. In this study, we used reliable DCE MRI technique to measure ATT of
calf muscle in both healthy controls and peripheral artery disease patients and
after plantar flexion of different loads. Our study showed that ATT of calf
muscle varied with multiple factors, including muscle group, exercise load and
healthy status, and had a wide range of 0~4 sec. The result suggests the
necessity of performing calf-muscle ASL with multiple different post-labeling
delays.
Introduction: Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI
measures tissue perfusion by labeling arterial blood, and after a post-labeling
delay (PLD, or TI), imaging the tissue (1). During PLD, the labeled blood
transits from labeling site to imaging slice. To achieve high signal-to-noise
ratio, PLD should be short enough that the longitudinal (T1)
magnetization of the labeled blood has not recovered much. On the other hand,
PLD should be longer than arterial transit time (ATT) so that any labeled blood
has arrived at the imaging slice when the image is acquired.
For
peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients, calf-muscle perfusion during or after
exercise is an important indicator for muscle function. The presence of artery stenosis
could increase both ATT and its spatial heterogeneity, which would make the
selection of proper PLD and thus accurate quantification of calf-muscle
perfusion more difficult. In this study
using DCE MRI, we investigated the range and heterogeneity of ATT in calf
muscle of both healthy and PAD subjects after exercise of different
intensities. The knowledge we gain in this study will help guide proper data acquisition
design for calf-muscle ASL.
Methods and
materials: This
study was approved by local institutional research board. We included 9 healthy
volunteers and 5 PAD patients (ankle-brachial index 0.56-0.84, 0.69±0.14). Each subject was scanned at 3T (TimTrio,
Siemens). To enhance calf-muscle perfusion, an MR-compatible plantar-flexion
apparatus was set up in the scanner. Subjects performed single-leg plantar
flexion at different workloads (4, 8 and 16 lbs at 1 Hz, or 2.7, 5.4 and 10.8
watts) for 3 min. With 0.05 mmol/kg gadoteridol injected 5 sec earlier, DCE MRI
started immediately after exercise cessation, using a FLASH sequence prepared
with saturation recovery: inversion time 300 ms, TR 527 ms, TE 1.42 ms, flip
angle 15°, slice thickness 10 mm, number of averages 1, image matrix 128×128,
field of view 180×180 mm. Each acquisition (~1.5 sec) covered three slices including
an axial slice at maximal cross-sectional area of calf muscle. With measured
equilibrium magnetization, gadolinium concentration was estimated for each post-contrast
image frame. To estimate ATT, arterial input function (AIF) was sampled from
peroneal artery in the muscle slice; a Heaviside step function was convolved
with AIF, and ATT as an independent variable of the step function was optimized
to match the convolution to concentration versus time curve of each muscle
voxel. As a result, a map of ATT was obtained for each subject, and regions of
interest (ROI) were manually drawn to estimate the average ATT for each muscle
group.
Results: Example of ATT map is shown in
Fig. 1. ATT values for all the subjects are listed in Table 1. The overall range
of the ATT values was about 0.1 ~ 4 sec. Different muscle groups:
peroneal and gastrocnemius muscles, which are supposed to be activated in
plantar flexion, had shorter ATT (1~2 sec) than the other muscles; soleus’s ATT
was the longest, ~3 sec. Different exercise loads: High exercise load is
supposed to cause high cardiac output, thus high blood velocity and low ATT.
Our results show that ATT did not decrease significantly until the load
increased to 16 lbs. The ATT values for the muscles were comparable for
exercises of 4 and 8 lbs. PAD vs. healthy subjects: For the PAD
patients, ATT of peroneal and gastrocnemius muscles with 4-lbs exercise were
higher than those in the healthy subjects, by about 0.6-0.7 sec, which could be
due to the upstream stenosis. When exercise load increased to 8 lbs, ATT of gastrocnemius
muscle for the PAD decreased to the healthy level, about 1.7 sec. As ATT of
soleus muscle for the PAD also decreased when exercise load increased to 8 lbs
(different from the healthy ones), it was possible that at exercise load of 8
lbs, cardiac output for the patients was pushed to so high a level that blood
velocity towards both gastrocnemius and soleus increased significantly.
Discussion: Our study showed that ATT of calf muscle varied with
multiple factors, including muscle compartment, exercise load and healthy
status. Maximum ATT, ~5 sec, was mostly found in soleus after low-intensity
exercise, while minimum ATT, ~0.1 sec, was found in gastrocnemius with
high-intensity exercise. The wide range of ATT values indicates a wide range of
blood velocity through calf muscle upon exercise. With such large range of
transit time, no single PLD should be optimal for quantifying perfusion for the
various muscles with ASL. Instead, ASL acquisition with multiple different
delay times is necessary for accurately quantifying calf-muscle perfusion.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Alsop, Detre, Golay et al. Magn Reson Med 73:102-116 (2015).