Maryam Falahpour1, Chi Wah Wong1, and Thomas T. Liu1
1Center for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
Global signal (GS) regression is a commonly used preprocessing approach in
the analysis of resting-state fMRI data. However GSR should be used with caution
as it can not only induce spurious anti-correlations, but may also remove signal
of neural origin. Here we used simultaneously acquired EEG/fMRI data to study
the relation between the GS and an EEG-based measure of vigilance at rest. We
found that there is a significant negative correlation between the GS and EEG
vigilance. Our results indicate that GS has a significant neuronal component
and further emphasizes the need to exercise caution when regressing out the GS.Purpose
Global signal (GS) regression is a commonly used preprocessing approach
in the analysis of resting state fMRI data. However GSR should be used with caution
as it can not only induce spurious anti-correlations,
1 but may also remove
signal of neural origin. A prior animal study found strong temporal correlations
between the local field potential at a single location and the fMRI signal across
a widespread region of the cortex.
2 Here we used simultaneously
acquired EEG/fMRI data in human subjects to study the relation between the fMRI
GS time course and an EEG-based measure of time-varying vigilance during both
the eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions at rest.
Methods
EEG-fMRI data were simultaneously acquired
on 9 healthy subjects (3 females) during three resting-state sessions using a 3T
GE MR750 system and a 64 channel EEG system (Brain Products). Each session
included one EC and one EO scan (5 minutes each). EEG data processing included:
1) MR gradient artifacts removal, 2) low pass filtering (fc=30Hz) and then
down-sampling to 250Hz, 3) removing cardio-ballistic and residual artifacts
using OBS-ICA.
3,4 A spectrogram was created using a short-time
Fourier transform with a 1311 point 4-term Blackman-Harris window and 65.7%
overlap, resulting in 1.8s temporal resolution. For each channel in the
spectrogram matrix, the value in each frequency bin was divided by the root
mean square (rms) of the bin values across frequencies. A relative EEG
amplitude spectrum was then calculated by taking the rms of the normalized
spectrogram entries across time and channels. At each time point, a measure of
vigilance (Vig) was then defined as the rms of relative alpha amplitude
(7-13Hz) divided by the rms of the relative delta (1-4Hz) and theta (4-7Hz)
amplitudes.
5 In order to account for the hemodynamic delay, the vigilance
time series was convolved with a hemodynamic response function. Outlier
detection was applied to the mean of all EEG amplitude time courses to remove
motion-contaminated time segments from both the spectrogram and fMRI time series.
fMRI data were acquired with the following
parameters: echo planar imaging with 166 volumes, 30 slices, 3.4×3.4×5mm
3 voxel size, 64×64 matrix size, TR=1.8s, TE=30ms. For each session, high
resolution anatomical data were acquired using a magnetization prepared 3D fast
spoiled gradient (FSPGR) sequence. Each anatomical volume was registered with
the functional data. Nuisance regressors (1
st +2
nd order
Legendre, 6 motion regressors and their first derivatives, mean BOLD signals
from the WM and CSF voxels and their first derivatives, RETROICOR
6 and RVHRCOR
7 noise terms) were removed from the raw data through
linear regression. For each voxel, a percent change BOLD time series was
obtained by subtracting the mean value and then dividing the resulting difference
by the mean value. The global signal was formed by averaging the percent change
time series across all brain voxels. For each scan the correlation between the
GS and Vig was calculated after excluding the censored time points. The
correlation coefficients were then normalized to Fisher-z scores for group
comparison.
Results and Discussion
Figure 1 displays the correlation coefficients between the GS and
Vig time series for each subject. We found significant (p<0.05, uncorrected)
negative correlation between the GS and Vig in 70% and 63% of the EC and EO
scans, respectively. Performing t-tests on the z-transformed correlations also
confirmed the overall negative relations in both EC (t=-8.47, p=5.9×10
-9) and EO conditions (t= -8.43,
p=6.4×10
-9). We did not find a significant
difference between the EC and EO conditions (EO-EC: t= 1.5, p=0.14). Figure 2 shows
the GS and Vig time series from a representative subject. For display purposes,
the vigilance is multiplied by -1. Figure 3 illustrates the mean of the percent
BOLD images averaged over the bottom 10% and the top 10% time points of the
vigilance time series for the same subject. Consistent with the negative correlation
between the Vig and GS, periods of high vigilance are characterized
by a widespread reduction in the BOLD signal. Our
results are consistent with prior studies that have found negative correlations
on a regional basis between the BOLD and EEG alpha power
8-10, and
also relatively higher theta power during alpha deactivation.
10 Our
results contribute to the understanding that the GS has a significant neuronal component
and further emphasizes the need to exercise caution when regressing out the GS.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Murphy et. al.,
Neuroimage 2009, 44:893-905.
[2] Scholvinck et. al. PNAS 2010, 107:10238-10243.
[3] Delorme et. al., J of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
[4] Debener et. al., Neuroimage 2007, 34:587-597.
[5] Wong et. al., Neuroimage 2013, 83:983-90.
[6] Glover et. al., Magn Reson Med 2000, 44:162-167.
[7] Chang et. al., Neuroimage 2009, 47:1448-1459.
[8] Laufs et. al. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1463-1476.
[9] Chang et. al., Neuroimage 2013, 72:227-236.
[10] Laufs et. al. Neuroimage 2006, 31:1408-1418.