Tomokazu Tsurugizawa1, Yoshifumi Abe1, and Denis Le Bihan1
1NeuroSpin, Bât 145, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique-Saclay Center, 91191, France, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Synopsis
BOLD
fMRI which relies on neurovascular coupling may fail when neurovascular
coupling is weakened, such as anesthesia or alcohol intoxication. In contrast, diffusion
fMRI has been shown to be more directly linked to neuronal
activation even in the absence of neurovascular coupling. We compared BOLD fMRI
and diffusion fMRI (ADC) time-courses with local field potentials (LFPs) in rat
nucleus accumbens following alcohol stimulation under two different doses of medetomidine
anesthesia. The ADC responses were correlated with LFP signals while BOLD
signals were not. These results show the interest of diffusion fMRI to avoid
confounds from varying conditions of neurovascular coupling.Purpose
Blood
oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI is widely-used to investigate brain
activity. However, BOLD fMRI, relying on the neurovascular coupling, fails in
some conditions which prevent neurovascular coupling, i.e., anesthesia and
alcohol intoxication
1. In contrast, diffusion fMRI
2 is
directly linked to neuronal activation showing neuronal responses even when
neurovascular coupling is abolished
3. Hence, we compared BOLD fMRI,
diffusion fMRI and ADC changes with local field potentials (LFPs) in the nucleus
accumbens (NAc) by alcohol stimulation (vasodilator and dopamine secretion
facilitator in NAc) under medetomidine anesthesia (vasoconstrictor and dopamine
secretion inhibitor in NAc).
Methods
Animals
Male Wistar rats (200-300 g) (n = 6 – 10 / group) were
anesthetized under a high (0.25 mg/kg/h) or a low (0.1 mg/kg/h) medetomidine
anesthesia (i.v.). As shown in Fig. 1A, following EtOH (4 mg/kg) or saline
(0.9% NaCl) injection (i.p.) 10 min after the start of the data acquisition, it
was then continued for 20 min.
FMRI
FMRI
acquisition was conducted at 7T using a volume coil (Pharmascan, Bruker,
Germany). FMRI images were acquired using a diffusion-sensitized double spin-echo
EPI sequence, TR/TE = 9,000/35 ms, 32 x 32 mm (100 x 100 pixels), 1.2 mm
thickness, 6 slices, b = 200, 1000 and 1800 s/mm². The images with b = 200
s/mm² were used as the BOLD (spin-echo) fMRI signal. The ADC was calculated as
ADC= ln[S(1000) / S(1800)] / 800 to eliminate IVIM and T2-weighting residual
effects. For t-contrast, the regressor was constructed using the time-course of
averaged LFPs gamma bands in NAc. Time-courses were extracted using region of
interest of NAc (Fig. 2B) and then calculated as percent changes to averaged baseline (within 5
min before injection)
LFP
Separated
from fMRI, LFPs in the NAc were recorded with a single tungsten microelectrode
as shown in Fig. 1B, at 1 kHz sampling rate using data acquisition software
(Power Lab, ADInstruments, New Zealand). The reference electrode was positioned
on the scalp. Then powers of frequency bands (alpha, 8–12 Hz; beta, 18–30 Hz;
gamma, 60–80 Hz) were analyzed.
Results
The
power of the gamma oscillation increased to reach a peak around 5 min after EtOH
infusion under high medetomidine, then decreased below baseline level. Under
low medetomidine, it marked a biphasic response, and then fluctuated and gradually
decreased (Fig. 2). The powers of alpha and beta bands decreased slightly. The ADC
time-course in NAc mirrored, but in opposite direction, the LFP gamma
oscillation power, showing a fast negative response at high dose of
medetomidine followed by ADC increase (Fig. 3). Under low dosage of
medetomidine, the ADC response was biphasic, and then fluctuated slightly.
Overall, there was a significant negative correlation between the ADC and the power
of LFPs gamma oscillation time-courses at both medetomidine concentrations (p
< 0.05; regression analysis) (Fig. 3B). While, the BOLD fMRI signals
decreased following EtOH infusion and the decrease with low medetomidine was
greater than that with high medetomidine. There was no significant correlation between
BOLD and the power of gamma band (p > 0.05; regression analysis) (Fig. 3B).
The ADC and BOLD fMRI time-courses remain flat by a saline infusion as negative
control (Fig. 4).
Discussion
As both medetomidine
and EtOH oppositely regulate dopamine secretion in NAc
4, 5, the neuronal
activity pattern differed according to medetomidine dose, which was well
reflected by the ADC response and not the BOLD response. Those results confirm
that water diffusion more closely reflects neural events without interference
with the neurovascular coupling upon which BOLD fMRI relies. It is important to
notice that diffusion-weighted signals are necessarily T2-weighted and, thus,
include a BOLD fraction
6. This residual BOLD effect can be removed using
ADCs.
Conclusion
Diffusion
fMRI, through the ADC, appears a suitable biomarker of neural activation,
reflecting LPFs responses and avoiding confounds from varying conditions of neurovascular
coupling, with potential for pharmacological fMRI studies.
Acknowledgements
We thank to Mr. Boudif Djemai for support of experiment.References
1. Tsurugizawa
T. Neuroimaging of gut nutrient perception. Curr Pharm Des.
2014;20(16):2738-2744.
2. Le Bihan D, Urayama S, Aso T,
et al. Direct and
fast detection of neuronal activation in the human brain with diffusion MRI. PNAS.
2006;103(21):8263-8268.
3. Tsurugizawa
T, Ciobanu L, Le Bian D. Water diffusion in brain cortex closely tracks
underlying neuronal activity. PNAS. 2013;110(28):11636-11641.
4. Ihalainen,
JA, Tanila, H. In vivo regulation of dopamine and noradrenaline release by
alpha2A-adrenoceptors in the mouse nucleus accumbens. J Neurochem. 2004;91(1):49-56.
5. Koob
GF. A role for GABA mechanisms in the motivational effects of alcohol. Biochem
Pharmacol. 2004;68(8):1515-1525.
6. Aso T, Urayama S, Poupon C, et al. An intrinsic diffusion response
function for analyzing diffusion functional MRI time series. 2009;47(4):1487-1495.